|
Ryanair probed for charging passengers extra to sit in emergency row seats
Fox: Ryanair probed for charging passengers extra to sit in emergency row seats
Is this illegal? They charge fees for everything else it seems... The Irish Aviation Authority is investigating the airline after passengers complained they were being forced to pay an extra £10 (or about $16) to sit in seats by emergency exits. Passengers like these seats because they offer more leg room. While the airline isn't the first to charge for the extra space, they're refusing to let passengers who haven't paid sit there, yet nearby passengers are still expected to man the exit door in case of emergency. "I wasn’t allowed to sit in the emergency exit row so I sat in the window seat in the row in front. Before take-off, one of the cabin crew spoke to me, and another passenger who was in the aisle seat," a Ryanair passenger told the Daily Mail. "Basically, she was saying that, since we were the closest to the emergency exit, we’d have to make sure we’d read and understood the instructions for opening the doors in the middle of the plane in an emergency." |
Originally Posted by rwoman
(Post 18242600)
Fox: Ryanair probed for charging passengers extra to sit in emergency row seats
Is this illegal? They charge fees for everything else it seems... |
Originally Posted by Brobbel
(Post 18242615)
I guess it's not illegal to charge fees for sitting in an exit row (more airlines do that), but to leave the exit row empty when nobody wants to pay.
Personally I would refuse to take responsibility under the briefing unless sat *in* the row. Neil |
A couple of my colleagues have a lot of experience with FR...and one flies from STN to Bremen, Germany several times a month. He said they try to charge 10GBP or 10EUR to people as they sit in the exit row...he sees it all the time and, as such, avoids sitting in the exit.
I would not want to be assigned the exit row responsibility unless I was sitting there...paid or not... |
so, if UK law forces FR to have people sitting there, how can they force people to pay 10 quid if they sit there. They cannot chase them away, as they have to be there by law.
It is becoming more and more obvious that FR is struggling to survive and they are saving by reducing safety. |
well they charge extras for everything else so why should the benefit of more leg room in that aisle be any different. However you are burdened with the possibility of having to act in an emergency.
|
Originally Posted by mith
(Post 18243253)
so, if UK law forces FR to have people sitting there, how can they force people to pay 10 quid if they sit there.
Of course it doesn't explain what happens if someone does book such an exit seat but is unable to fulfill their legal duties |
Originally Posted by pacer142
(Post 18242980)
Don't know about Irish rules, but I believe the UK rule is that people actually must be in the exit row.
On a lightly-loaded flight, I and others were moved out of the exit row for weight and balance reasons. I was pretty steamed that I'd lost my leg room and that there was no one to immediately operate the exit. The FA didn't care. |
ooooooooooo
|
Originally Posted by mith
(Post 18243253)
so, if UK law forces FR to have people sitting there, how can they force people to pay 10 quid if they sit there. They cannot chase them away, as they have to be there by law.
The point is that the fee is to guarantee you will be sitting there. If you don't pay, you only sit there free *if they ask you to*, and this will be at random. That's no different to declassified first class on a train. If you want to be sure to sit in first class, pay. But you might be lucky on a busy train and be allowed to sit there free. The only real issue with charging for the exit row is where your seats are so close together that I can't physically fit in at all in a normal seat. This is true of Wizzair's newer aircraft (because of their stupid thick-backed design), but I haven't found any others yet. While it's not comfortable I do *only just* fit in FR's seats. Neil |
Originally Posted by pacer142
(Post 18242980)
Don't know about Irish rules, but I believe the UK rule is that people actually must be in the exit row.
Personally I would refuse to take responsibility under the briefing unless sat *in* the row. Neil |
Originally Posted by mith
(Post 18243253)
[...]
It is becoming more and more obvious that FR is struggling to survive and they are saving by reducing safety. e.g. BBC News - Ryanair profits from higher revenues (7 Nov '11) |
Exactly - built on the SW business model. They give the vast majority what they want. Low cost flights.
|
I understand that they rather keep the seats in the exit row empty unless somebody pays for it. THis might cause trouble, because the people who would be the first to reach the exit in the case of emergency might not know how to open the door. So, it is a security issue. Irish aviation law seems not to be very safety friendly.
It seems to me that few people want to pay for it. I mean, I would if it is a long flight to the canaries or so, but for a short flight, i am fine - thanks to the "non-reclining" seat set up. Other people (shorter, fatter) prefer not to sit in the exit or bulk head row, because the seats are narrower and they dont care about the leg room. |
Originally Posted by mith
(Post 18251647)
So, it is a security issue.
(PS Sorry, didn't mean to sound arrogant. I should have remembered that "safety" and "security" often get mixed up by non-native speakers because some languages have just one word to cover the two) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.