Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Malaysia Airlines | Enrich
Reload this Page >

MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Wikipost is Locked  
Old Mar 17, 2014, 3:08 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
PLEASE READ FIRST: WELCOME and MODERATOR NOTE

Welcome to the MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk!
Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that covers the most up-to-date traveler information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel.

All travelers are welcome in the community. Just choose a forum: conversing about airlines and their programs, airports, destinations, dining and how to make the most of your miles and points, or visit our Information Desk to start.
We do have some Rules, and everyone agrees to abide by these when they are granted free membership privileges. On a topic that generates a lot of feelings and perspectives, perhaps the most useful one is:

Respect our Diversity - link to this guideline

FlyerTalk members come from all walks of life and all parts of the world. We are as diverse in our makeup as we are alike in our passion for frequent flyer programs. Because we all bring a unique perspective to the forum, our collective experience is broadened, and we gain new insights.

Our diversity demands that we respect each other. Due to the inherent constraints of the Internet, humor, sarcasm, language and slang can be easily misinterpreted - especially when crossing cultural boundaries.

When posting a message, pay extra care to how it might be interpreted. And when you come across a post that offends you, read it with an eye toward giving the poster the benefit of the doubt.

If you have an issue with a post, please contact the member privately or contact a moderator (click on the button). Do not make a situation worse by publicly responding.
MORE about the MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

In order to a) keep the original thread focused on confirmed news and known facts, and b) allow folks a place to discuss their ideas about what might have happened, the MH370 moderators and Community Director have decided to open this thread.

Here are the expectations:

1. The normal FT TOS apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions on-thread). And please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.

2. You are expected respect our diversity , and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, orientation, etc." Do not cite, copy, or report on such.

3. Please do continue to be attentive to the sensibilities of the families of those on the flight. Think about if you were them what you would and would not want to see posted. Speculation about what happened is permissible; please, though, do not indulge in inflammatory or overly-lurid descriptions that could well be hurtful.

4. Overly / extravagantly exaggerative posts such as conspiracy theories, posts beyond the realm of science and known facts, etc. as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously, information that has been posted in the News thread wiki or FAQ, may be deleted.
E.g. the aircraft was vaporized.

In terms of housekeeping, posts may get moved from the "news" thread if and as needed, and posts that do not conform to these simple expectations, above, will be deleted.

Also note: this wiki is locked; changes can only be made by moderators.

Thank you.

Your MH370 Moderation Team
aBroadAbroad; cblaisd; JDiver; l'etoile; NewbieRunner; oliver2002; Prospero
and Community Director
SanDiego1K
Print Wikipost

MH370 Discussion and Speculation Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:07 pm
  #661  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 97
BBC summarising all of the theories and speculations that circulate on the net re the missing plane:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26609687
userasc is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:10 pm
  #662  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, UA Nobody, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,372
Originally Posted by userasc
This drop down was shown several times on the Sky News UK today.. I was specifically waiting for the repeat and it did repeat the same story..

45000 - 5000 - 35 000

It would be really useful to have a pilot clarify what this manoeuvre means after the turn back..
http://news.sky.com/story/1228537/mi...xplain-mystery
I've not seen a reliable named source for those altitudes and the Malaysian authorities have publicly questioned the reports. Even if those heights were correct, haven't some pilots speculated that throttle hold on the autopilot could account for this in an "unmanned" situation.

I suspect until the wreck is found we'll never know the truth, I just hope it's found quickly and the relatives don't have the agonizing wait that occurred with the AF crash.
alex_b is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:12 pm
  #663  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,748
Originally Posted by userasc
This drop down was shown several times on the Sky News UK today.. I was specifically waiting for the repeat and it did repeat the same story..

45000 - 5000 - 35 000

It would be really useful to have a pilot clarify what this manoeuvre means after the turn back..
http://news.sky.com/story/1228537/mi...xplain-mystery
Isn't this data from the primary military radar without the transponder sending the altitude? Not sure what the reliability of such altitude estimates are. I don't see how the plane would have survived such a manuever structurally in the time frame of that manuever. Is it possible that the reality was a 5000 ft drop from 45000, possibly from a stall, a recovery back to 35,000 ft and is being misreported?
venk is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:18 pm
  #664  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, UA Nobody, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,372
Originally Posted by venk
Isn't this data from the primary military radar without the transponder sending the altitude? Not sure what the reliability of such altitude estimates are. I don't see how the plane would have survived such a manuever structurally in the time frame of that manuever. Is it possible that the reality was a 5000 ft drop from 45000, possibly from a stall, a recovery back to 35,000 ft and is being misreported?
Also 45k is above the ceiling of the 777 which was explained in detail on the other thread. There is a good deal of error in these measurements and the Malaysian authorities have said as much. Unfortunately all of the uncertainty disappears in the reporting.
alex_b is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:25 pm
  #665  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: BNE AUS.
Programs: Skywards Gold & Others
Posts: 46
Originally Posted by userasc
This drop down was shown several times on the Sky News UK today.. I was specifically waiting for the repeat and it did repeat the same story..

45000 - 5000 - 35 000

It would be really useful to have a pilot clarify what this manoeuvre means after the turn back..
http://news.sky.com/story/1228537/mi...xplain-mystery
IF, (and as far as I can see at the moment, this has not been categorically substantiated) this occurred, there are a myriad of explanations. One of which could be (again for a myriad of reasons) a total loss of controls to ailerons, rudder etc and therefore yoke, yaw, attitude, altitude etc becomes virtually impossible to control. The only real tool then at your disposal, is the throttle.

If the plane starts to ascend, back the throttles off to slow the airspeed and the plane (if it doesn't totally stall and uncontrollably drop) will start to descend. Once the plane starts to descend, it picks up speed, creates lift, descent slows and possibly will start to ascend again. Couple this with a pilot manually manipulating the throttles in an effort to assist this action in order to control the planes vertical and horizontal movements and the resulting flight path would most likely be an up down wave pattern and theoretically could replicate 45,000 - 5,000 - 35,000 repeat repeat repeat.

Then again, 45,000 - 5,000 - 35,000 may never of actually happened.

Last edited by BNE2?; Mar 19, 2014 at 8:28 pm Reason: spell check
BNE2? is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:39 pm
  #666  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 213
Two questions that I haven't seen answered directly before:

1. Can a pilot intentionally depressurize an airplane at cruise altitude? Could the pilot have access to oxygen to stay alive while the oxygen available to passengers runs out.

2. People keep talking about passengers trying to make calls on cell phones, but even without trying to make calls, cell phones that are on will try to contact towers on the ground. If the contact is successful and a connection is established, the phone identifies itself to the tower and that information is recorded by the tower. Has there been any word from authorities that they have searched the phone records of all passengers and found that no pings occurred at any cell towers in the region (Indonesia, Central Asia etc.) after the flight took off?
kilbornr is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:40 pm
  #667  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 31
ive read several extra pages now on different sites and watched news channels. why is the flight path different on a few of them?

surely everyones looking at the same data?
brett1982 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 8:46 pm
  #668  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 97
When you think the things cannot get more strange..

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...efence-company
userasc is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:36 pm
  #669  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: AA,CO, AS
Posts: 58
Some debris being checked by Aussies, briefing 1615 UTC March 20.
https://twitter.com/search?q=kjbar&src=typd
pspercy is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:37 pm
  #670  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: DFW, 3.5 MM, AA EXP, LIFETIME PLATINUM, MARRIOTT LIFETIME PLATINUM, STARWOOD AMBASSADOR 223 NIGHTS, AND LIFETIME GOLD, HILTON DIAMOND, NATIONAL EXECUTIVE ELITE
Posts: 5,847
March 19, 2014

CNN Breaking News 10:30 PM Dallas, Texas Time

CNN now reporting that Australia PM is going to announce that they may have found two pieces of debris located near Australia.

Approximately 1400 miles east of Perth, Australia.
freeupgrade is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:42 pm
  #671  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: AA,CO, AS
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by freeupgrade
March 19, 2014

CNN Breaking News 10:30 PM Dallas, Texas Time

CNN now reporting that Australia PM is going to announce that they may have found two pieces of debris located near Australia.

Approximately 1400 miles east of Perth, Australia.
West, surely ?
pspercy is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:47 pm
  #672  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 31
bbc just said theyre sending a plane to check it out but wont be there till thursday afternoon. i guess thats uk time so 9 hours + away.
brett1982 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:47 pm
  #673  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: BNE AUS.
Programs: Skywards Gold & Others
Posts: 46
Originally Posted by pspercy
West, surely ?
Yes, definately west.....cause it sure aint in my back yard!
BNE2? is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:47 pm
  #674  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane (BNE), Australia, QF/VA Forums Meeting Organiser
Programs: VA Plat, QF Gold (97.4% LTG), QP Life, AA (66% LTG). HH Diamond. Amex Plat, Visa Plat
Posts: 6,519
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politi...320-354ij.html

This might mean the shut down on this thread, if it really is the wreckage (well, it may take quite a while to end the speculation with fact)
QF WP is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2014, 9:48 pm
  #675  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: UA Premier Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriot Gold, National Executive
Posts: 73
If it is found here, it seems that the plane flew till it ran out of juice, either due to some technical issue or possibly something along the lines of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961
Hill713 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.