Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Which Business Class to Manila from LAX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2014, 6:12 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 463
Originally Posted by onebigworld
I'd read that on (some) EVA business class configurations the passengers face each other, which I'd not like. (if this is true).
It is not true. It is either face forward (Premium Laurel and Super Business) or reverse herringbone (Royal Laurel).

Lounge access at LAX is the communal *A lounges, in EVA's own in Taipei, and in the Delta lounge at MNL, though I almost preferred the PAGS lounge on the top floor over Delta's.
RandomNobody is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2014, 1:28 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DXB / KUO
Programs: AY, SQ, EK
Posts: 858
My only experience of PAL transpac J is from the SFO-MNL route on an aged 747-400 a couple of years ago. For sure, that products was somewhat behind the times...

What no one has mentioned from what I can see is that PAL operate their new 777-300ER on MNL-LAX route now. The product should be much better on this a/c...

http://www.philippineflightnetwork.c...to-london.html

http://www.philippineairlines.com/pr...ness_class.jsp



I don't think one can really go wrong with BR, NH, JL, OZ etc. - although the regional product might not be the greatest for the intra-Asia sector if that matters.
nanyang is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2014, 6:38 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 109
Just for your future reference, I flew on Qatar from Barcelona to Bangkok in June 2014 in business. It was fantastic! The flight did have a stopover in Doha, but the service was excellent, and the lie flat seats were amazing! I didn’t want to get off the plane! The flight from Doha to Bangkok had even more spacious seats, I couldn’t believe it. The TV monitor that was on the back of the seat in front of me, was so far away, I had a hard time seeing it! (I wear bi-focals) It was at least a 16” monitor. (I was on a b777-300ER). The lie flat seats are truly lie flat, so you will have a good flight!
hot2trot is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2014, 11:06 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAH
Programs: Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist, DL Plat, UA Silver
Posts: 4,043
Originally Posted by nanyang
My only experience of PAL transpac J is from the SFO-MNL route on an aged 747-400 a couple of years ago. For sure, that products was somewhat behind the times...

What no one has mentioned from what I can see is that PAL operate their new 777-300ER on MNL-LAX route now. The product should be much better on this a/c...

http://www.philippineflightnetwork.c...to-london.html

http://www.philippineairlines.com/pr...ness_class.jsp


I don't think one can really go wrong with BR, NH, JL, OZ etc. - although the regional product might not be the greatest for the intra-Asia sector if that matters.

The new business class on PAL still seems like the old days. Reminds me of LOT's new 787
TennisNoob is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2014, 2:48 am
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
Originally Posted by exwannabe
OP, one correction to your mindset. You will certainly be the one getting the miles for the flight. They go to the pax, not the ticket buyer.

Probably should not sway your purchase decision much, but do get the miles recorded with some program. Most of the airlines you are looking at will let you post the miles to a UA or AA account. Even if you pick some airline you have no useful affiliation with, sign up with them (or one of their partners) and book the miles. You never know.
However, the mention of cheap travel agents and low business class fares makes this deal sound like a consolidator fare, which would not earn (full) miles on all FF programs. If it's a mileage broker ticket, it won't earn any miles and might leave the OP stranded.

DL connecting through NRT is efficient with real flat beds with 100% direct aisle access in the 1-2-1 configuration or 1-1 on the upper deck of the 747.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2014, 3:14 am
  #21  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,991
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
However, the mention of cheap travel agents and low business class fares makes this deal sound like a consolidator fare, which would not earn (full) miles on all FF programs. If it's a mileage broker ticket, it won't earn any miles and might leave the OP stranded.

DL connecting through NRT is efficient with real flat beds with 100% direct aisle access in the 1-2-1 configuration or 1-1 on the upper deck of the 747.
If the OP said anything about cheap tickets, I missed it.
moondog is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2014, 9:23 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Southern California
Programs: AE Business Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt,, Priority Pass for AE & RC Chase, Global Entry, CLEAR
Posts: 110
Moondog, you are correct. I have no idea how the company purchases their tickets. I don't want the company to have to spend more than necessary, but I need to be comfortable so I can be my best. Having looked at some of the top suggested airlines from this thread, it looks like CX and EVA are what I am used to on long flights. They have the reverse herringbone 1-2-1 with fully-flat beds in a pod-like seat. I know I can sleep in one of these from my VS flights and I'll have enough privacy.

To get the same kind of seat on Asiana requires their business Smartium class and from reading another thread, I gather I may not be guaranteed I'd get that.
That seems to be a problem with some of the other airlines as well.

It's a shame I have to fly in Sept because the CX sale ends Aug 30.
onebigworld is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2014, 12:31 am
  #23  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Southern California
Programs: AE Business Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt,, Priority Pass for AE & RC Chase, Global Entry, CLEAR
Posts: 110
Thanks to all for helping me. The company is sending me on CX Business flight 881. I'm very pleased. I don't know how meals will be served on this flight, leaving at 1 AM, arriving at 6:45 AM Hong Kong. But my question for this group is this -- the travel agent asked for my frequent flyer number and they put down my NZ one. I think that is because it will transfer more easily to Virgin Atlantic which is what I like to fly to London - does that make sense? Also, I don't see my Global Entry number in the e-ticket receipt they sent.
onebigworld is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2014, 11:01 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Plat, DL, AS, UA, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,404
CX miles will not credit to NZ on this flight.
bzcat is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2014, 12:18 pm
  #25  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,991
Originally Posted by onebigworld
Thanks to all for helping me. The company is sending me on CX Business flight 881. I'm very pleased. I don't know how meals will be served on this flight, leaving at 1 AM, arriving at 6:45 AM Hong Kong. But my question for this group is this -- the travel agent asked for my frequent flyer number and they put down my NZ one. I think that is because it will transfer more easily to Virgin Atlantic which is what I like to fly to London - does that make sense? Also, I don't see my Global Entry number in the e-ticket receipt they sent.
I'm one of the many people who doesn't care for cx j food so sleeping through the first meal on night flights is an easy choice for me. (If you miss it, the stewardess tend to strongly advise against reheating, but they are pretty good at cobbling together appetizers and the like mid flight). The food in the lounge at lax can be pretty decent.
moondog is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2014, 12:19 pm
  #26  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
Originally Posted by onebigworld
Thanks to all for helping me. The company is sending me on CX Business flight 881. I'm very pleased. I don't know how meals will be served on this flight, leaving at 1 AM, arriving at 6:45 AM Hong Kong. But my question for this group is this -- the travel agent asked for my frequent flyer number and they put down my NZ one. I think that is because it will transfer more easily to Virgin Atlantic which is what I like to fly to London - does that make sense? Also, I don't see my Global Entry number in the e-ticket receipt they sent.
Your travel agent is confused. Figure out where you want to credit miles for this trip and tell them to enter that FF number. Your GE number won't help on PreCheck exLAX on CX, but it might make it quicker to use the GE machines when you return from Asia; I don't know whether it should be on a CX ticket or not.

Unless your company requires that miles earned from business travel be used for future business travel, you can credit miles to whatever program you please.

BTW, I don't think CX miles can transfer to Virgin Atlantic because that airline is the competitor of BA and AA, which are alliance partners of CX. Normally among major airlines you can credit to other carriers in the same alliance. There are also some bilateral partnerships out there, like AS (plus the Virgins, Gulf carriers, and MH before it joined oneworld).

However, often partner flights earn few or no miles if booked in discounted fare classes, including some cheap or promotional business class fares, so be sure to check the specific earnings for your ticket before deciding what FF number to use.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2014, 12:27 pm
  #27  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,991
Msp: I'm guessing the op thought he could earn nz points based on the cx/nz partnership but as someone else pointed lax-hkg isn't part of the deal.
moondog is offline  
Old Jul 25, 2014, 6:57 pm
  #28  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Southern California
Programs: AE Business Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt,, Priority Pass for AE & RC Chase, Global Entry, CLEAR
Posts: 110
Moondog, I think that was in the equation in fuzzy thinking, yes.

So here is the Fair Basis: IXSPCLRT Does that mean anything?

I see the Class is BUSINESS / l (I think that is an "l" if that makes sense).
onebigworld is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014, 4:58 am
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Southern California
Programs: AE Business Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt,, Priority Pass for AE & RC Chase, Global Entry, CLEAR
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by bzcat
I agree with your friend... given a choice, I would not fly PAL. The best transit point for LAX-MNL is either TPE and HKG so either EVA or Cathay are probably your best choice. Both have excellent business class seats and multiple daily services from LAX.

.
Originally Posted by TennisNoob
CX or EVA will be your best options in terms of comfort and service.

It's worth the stop over
It was well worth the stopover! And kind of nice to have a fresh plane. I went with CX and loved it. Had the flat seats on both legs and enjoyed great customer service. Thanks bzcat and TennisNoob for pointing me that way.
onebigworld is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2014, 12:32 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Magic Kingdom
Programs: AA Exp, Radisson VIP, Expedia OneKey Platinum, Hilton Gold, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Explorist, Amex Plati
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by msm
I've flown with Asiana to Manila twice in the last year. Perfect in all ways. Connection time in Incheon is good in both directions.

I was transiting on to the south of Philippines. Manila is not the best airport in the world for transiting travelers. If you are continuing on, I would recommend leaving yourself 3-4 hours. Just getting between terminals can be problematic. (Don't wait for the shuttle. There is no shuttle. Just hire a taxi)
Actually there is a shuttle. I just used it 3 days ago to get from T1 to T3. It goes about every half hour so if you're in a big hurry it might not work out. Leaving T1 it goes to T2 (PAL) first, then T4, then T3. So if you're going from T1 to T3 then the extra stops might make it not work out if you're on a short connection.
From T2 to T4 and on to T3 actually went through the inner parts of the airport near the taxiways and runway, sort of an interesting ride.
arabiamark is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.