Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old May 24, 2013, 7:54 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: coolfish1103
Google doc for China Airlines & Starlux Airlines
- 2017 China Airlines Network
- A document for Tigerair Taiwan (LCC) will soon be made.

Things to note:

Information may not be up-to-date and is only served as advice. It's best for one to call the airline or check the official website. This thread will only cover carriers not having their own forums operated from Taiwan (not China). It's recommended to read some recent discussions in this page or this section of the forum as they might not yet be updated.

Please visit EVA FT forum for information regards to EVA Air.

Miles Buzz

China Airlines (CI) - 中華航空
Subsidiary: Mandarin Airlines (AE) - 華信航空

Fare Family
- China Airlines has followed the steps of EVA Air adopting new fare system where you are charged depending on the booking class you purchase. Have a read: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/othe...y-br-v-ci.html and https://www.china-airlines.com/tw/en...ts/fare-family

Future destinations
- CI plans to operate Seattle from 15JUL24.

Mileage Upgrade no longer applicable to cheap tickets
- From July 2, 2020

You may only upgrade via miles with booking codes Y, B, M, K, Q, T, V for Economy and W, U, A for Premium Economy on all sectors.

Far Eastern Air Transport (FE) - 遠東航空

Ceased operation as of December 13, 2019.

STARLUX Airlines (JX) - 星宇航空

Future destinations
- JX plans to operate Seattle from 17AUG24.

New Lounge at Terminal 2
- First Class Lounge available for First Class passengers only (if not opting for HuanYu Terminal).

Fleet:
13x A321neo
11x A330-900neo (4 currently in service)
10x A350-900 (5 currently in service)

International Airport Gateways
TPE Taipei Taoyuan International Airport - 桃園國際機場
Print Wikipost

Information for Airlines based in Taiwan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2017, 11:32 pm
  #616  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by Kevin Liu
I'm seeing the firm orders as well; however, they don't have much time left as option must execute before the end of 2017.
Also, they've been talking about narrowbody renewal that should be announce before the end of last month.
Didn't see that in this year's PAS ........
Wondering what happened ......
Local news had CAL Chairman and Taoyuan Mayor in Everett over the weekend and there were mentions of 737Max by the chairman.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Jul 10, 2017, 7:15 am
  #617  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 246
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
Local news had CAL Chairman and Taoyuan Mayor in Everett over the weekend and there were mentions of 737Max by the chairman.
not too long ago they were talking about getting A320 NEOs for the traffic right to CDG .....
Kevin Liu is offline  
Old Jul 10, 2017, 1:47 pm
  #618  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Plat, DL, AS, UA, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,406
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
Local news had CAL Chairman and Taoyuan Mayor in Everett over the weekend and there were mentions of 737Max by the chairman.
737-10 probably will work very well for CI which doesn't need the extra range of A321Neo but could use the extra seats.
bzcat is offline  
Old Jul 10, 2017, 3:08 pm
  #619  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by Kevin Liu
not too long ago they were talking about getting A320 NEOs for the traffic right to CDG .....
It seems they may have given up on that. The CAL chairman and the Taoyuan Mayor are on some kind of tour in the US, first they stopped at Everett where they talked about the 737MAX, and then they are now in LA visiting CALs cargo facility.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2017, 6:52 am
  #620  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 246
Originally Posted by bzcat
737-10 probably will work very well for CI which doesn't need the extra range of A321Neo but could use the extra seats.
A321 NEO has more seat for sure ......
Originally, the proposal for -10 was to match the seat count with A321 NEO; however, customers don't like the idea and they ended up with making -10 lowest per seat mile cost ......
Personally, I still prefer to see CDG traffic right + A320 NEO family combo
Kevin Liu is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2017, 9:30 am
  #621  
Accor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: Dynasty Frequent Flyer (Elite Plus),Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,866
Originally Posted by Kevin Liu
A321 NEO has more seat for sure ......
Originally, the proposal for -10 was to match the seat count with A321 NEO; however, customers don't like the idea and they ended up with making -10 lowest per seat mile cost ......
Personally, I still prefer to see CDG traffic right + A320 NEO family combo
Not only that but Boeing is still stretching and bending a frame originally designed in the 1960's. Already the 737-9 max was seen as a stretch too far and yet they have even gone longer. The A321 is better designed for this size. Eventually maybe after an A322 or something Airbus would be better restarting again than keep stretching a frame. And yes an A321 does have more seats.
Plus not all 737 routes are under 2000 miles (directly yes but I think they cant fly over China on this one so it would bring them either over or around 2000 miles). Taipei-Burma is one that comes to mind. Anyway I suppose which ever one gives a lower price would do it. But Boeing can't offer any other possible incentives unlike trying to get CDG with an airbus deal.

One other thing is with both frames your unlikely to get anything in until 2021 at earliest I assume we are talking about B737-10 not the-8.
tris06 is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2017, 11:30 am
  #622  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Plat, DL, AS, UA, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,406
Since CI does not have any existing 737 Max orders, it likely won't get one sooner than 2021. But that doesn't mean it can't work out a deal with one of the leasing company that has converted its Max8 to Max10.
bzcat is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2017, 4:37 pm
  #623  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by Kevin Liu
A321 NEO has more seat for sure ......
Originally, the proposal for -10 was to match the seat count with A321 NEO; however, customers don't like the idea and they ended up with making -10 lowest per seat mile cost ......
Personally, I still prefer to see CDG traffic right + A320 NEO family combo
I want to see CDG too but if they try, I am sure BR will fight them for it.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 9:54 pm
  #624  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 246
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
I want to see CDG too but if they try, I am sure BR will fight them for it.
how ? BR just got additional slots this year to make the route frequency to daily
hardly find a reason BR can fight for more .....
Kevin Liu is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 9:59 pm
  #625  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by Kevin Liu
how ? BR just got additional slots this year to make the route frequency to daily
hardly find a reason BR can fight for more .....
The original agreement gave each carrier a monopoly for FRA and CDG, hard to see BR just let CI enter the market.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2017, 12:33 am
  #626  
Accor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: Dynasty Frequent Flyer (Elite Plus),Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,866
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
The original agreement gave each carrier a monopoly for FRA and CDG, hard to see BR just let CI enter the market.
I am not sure it works that way anymore.But it might be purely a French government issue if to allow another carrier into CDG or not. Also I think both carriers serve Amsterdam and yet they are in the EU so each country can have its own choice how to deal with it.

Most likely an option would be for CI to offer a Bangkok to CDG flight if possible. With the hope that BR might give up the route if loses even more money than before with the additional competition. Remember BR is only serving the route at a loss to prevent CI getting in. It was just a couple of years ago that BR even stopped the service for a number of months as demand was so low.
tris06 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2017, 1:09 am
  #627  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by tris06
I am not sure it works that way anymore.But it might be purely a French government issue if to allow another carrier into CDG or not. Also I think both carriers serve Amsterdam and yet they are in the EU so each country can have its own choice how to deal with it.

Most likely an option would be for CI to offer a Bangkok to CDG flight if possible. With the hope that BR might give up the route if loses even more money than before with the additional competition. Remember BR is only serving the route at a loss to prevent CI getting in. It was just a couple of years ago that BR even stopped the service for a number of months as demand was so low.
The EU does not recognize Taiwan as a country and therefore does not negotiate deals with it. It is up to individual countries to negotiate with Taiwan over air rights and other things.
The only reason BR served nonstop was because the French would not allow the BKK stopover. Why would that be any different now? Any how, CDG is a low yielding route from TPE even with high load %s, it'll be down to who drops the route first if they do start it. EVA has money that it can bleed, CI does not. Bowing out of the CDG market for BR would essentially mean giving up in Europe, they would only serve AMS, VIE, and LHR via BKK with little Taiwan traffic onboard.
CI should tread carefully, 90% drop in net income year on year is really bad.

Last edited by hayzel7773; Jul 13, 2017 at 1:31 am
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2017, 2:09 am
  #628  
Accor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: Dynasty Frequent Flyer (Elite Plus),Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,866
[/QUOTE]
CI should tread carefully, 90% drop in net income year on year is really bad.[/QUOTE]

I didn't see or hear anywhere that the airline dropped its income year on year. If that was true it would be charging its passengers peanuts for any flight.
tris06 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2017, 12:28 pm
  #629  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by tris06
CI should tread carefully, 90% drop in net income year on year is really bad.

I didn't see or hear anywhere that the airline dropped its income year on year. If that was true it would be charging its passengers peanuts for any flight.
CAL had a really really bad year.
Page 7 of the doc, CAL had a net income of 571,540 compared to the previous year of 5,763,714, which is a 90% drop. Despite the drop, revenues remained the same.
Total gain last year was 26,103 compared to 2015's 7,072,042.

https://www.china-airlines.com/tw/en...cm38-23505.pdf

Last edited by hayzel7773; Jul 13, 2017 at 12:36 pm
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2017, 8:25 pm
  #630  
Accor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: Dynasty Frequent Flyer (Elite Plus),Accor Platinum
Posts: 1,866
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
CAL had a really really bad year.
Page 7 of the doc, CAL had a net income of 571,540 compared to the previous year of 5,763,714, which is a 90% drop. Despite the drop, revenues remained the same.
Total gain last year was 26,103 compared to 2015's 7,072,042.

https://www.china-airlines.com/tw/en...cm38-23505.pdf
Actually I invest in companies and so know fiancials quite well. Yes the finiancials dont look great but remember they lost a huge amount from strikes mid way through last year. I think more importantly will be seeing how this years finiancials will go to get more an idea of trends , notice the year before they gained big time on fuel hedging and last year they lost on fuel hedging. Cathay also has been hurting because of fuel hedging. Also last year many payments still happened with aircraft procurement. Then i believe there was the US court fine which should have been paid last year. Actually comsidering financials for the last 10years 2015 FY was one of the better years. I am surprised they made any profit last year comsidering all the problems that happened.

Another issue is the airline has been doing more flights to the rest of asia especially south east at the loss of higher margin China flights. BR would also be hurting from this.

I doubt the airline is being too cautious as otherwise they would not have planned double daily A350 flights to SYD which could be considered their 2nd biggest long haul route by seat numbers after LAX.

Last edited by tris06; Jul 13, 2017 at 8:35 pm
tris06 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.