Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

JAL vs CX F Infighting comparison

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

JAL vs CX F Infighting comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2015, 11:43 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW or Somewhere Else
Programs: UA Plt /Delta DM/ Marriott Platinum Prem./Hilton Diamond / Hyatt Globalist /Hertz PS / National EE
Posts: 1,107
JAL vs CX F Infighting comparison

Wanted to make some simple pointers for those who are considering CX or JAL F. Overall I think CX destroys JAL but that's just my humble opinion. I just flew both so I can give a good recent comparison.

Seat - CX all the way. I found the seat more private and loved how wide the bed felt. JAL is newer , a little trendier but overall CX wins on privacy and comfort. Note JAL has nice mattresses but CX had better bedding

Cabin Ambiance - loved the brown leather and the Red carpet on JAL but the CX cabin just feels more spacious and brighter. No overhead bins on CX mean more airy feel and the artwork on CX is a nice added touch. JAL looks drab in comparison.

Crew - The worst CX crew I've had beats the JAL crew I had. Very poor English speaking skills. Constantly brought wrong order , would take things away before I wanted them taken away and overall hard to communicate. I think they meant well and we're there promptly when needed but just didn't feel as warm and welcome as on CX where I have always found crews speak superb English.

Food - CX. Oh I'm gonna here some pushback on this one!! CX by 10 miles !!! JAL food just didn't do it for me. It was presented well and I'm sure it's all very expensive but the variety,flavor and ability to meet my more western palette was far exceeded by CX.
- CX brings a fresh bread basket and it's always delicious with pretzel and garlic bread. JAL failed miserably with their fancy,stale and flavorless breads
- CX always has a delicious salad that you can add seafood to if you wish. JAL was lacking a normal western salad option. CX dressings are always good as well
- CX serves a huge USDA prime strip out of Hong Kong and it's always really good. I liked the Wagyu on JAL but portion was small and flavor lacking
-CX desserts are usually so so but they always at least have ice cream . Desserts on JAL were not very good except for the macaroons. This is a weak point of both but CX wins
- Drinks. OK. JAL takes the cake here. No doubt both have great drink menus. But JAL has some very exotic rare teas, sakes and Champagne. I like the taste of Krug over Salon but I think most like Salon more (probably due to its price tag) CX does have Hong kong milk tea and better Vodkas so still to each it's own. But overall JAL wins
- CX usually has a few western options and a few local options and the western options are truly western. On JAL if you don't like Japanese food you will be very limited on choice.
Lounge - The new pier at HKG is one of the best in the world for its style and service. JAL has a sushi bar serving up some great sushi although limited options. Overall CX wins on lounges
Cabin comfort - At first the JAL cabin was kept warm. Then I woke up sweating. They turn up the furnace overnight. Ouch. CX and almost every other airline on the planet win in cabin comfort.
Bathrooms - CX much nicer bathrooms with real linen towels and nicer furnishing. JAL has toto toilets but I thankfully didn't have to use them. I wish not to go Numero 2 on airplanes and wish the rest of the world would join me! Lol. Both airlines kept restrooms clean.

Overall. CX all the way. Due to the hot cabin, weird (but high quality ) food and poor English speaking skills. I may even take AA over JAL. At the end of the day fancy drinks and good service didn't make up for a blazing hot cabin that was very uncomfortable. Also ex-NRT I have had excellent catering on American

Well. That's my thoughts. Call them what you will. Not bias to either program! Not a member of Mileage bank or Marco Polo

PS....IFE is no comparison. I can call this a fact and not opinion : CX IFE is in a whole other league. I think JAL had 10 or less movie options in English and non were any good. Very few TV shows and extremely difficult to operate.

Last edited by aero0729; Aug 23, 2015 at 2:57 pm Reason: Fixed some typos
aero0729 is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 12:12 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Programs: Delta Gold, Alaska Gold 75K, LATAM Black
Posts: 3,393
JAL vs CX F Infighting comparison

Thank you for this !
Mauibaby2008 is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 3:26 pm
  #3  
formerly gemini573
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LAX, HKG, and BKK
Programs: CX Emerald, WOH Globalist, Marriott Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, Virtuoso, Prive, STEPS, STARS
Posts: 2,233
Both great airlines. I'd give the edge to JL on food, particularly their Japanese menu.

Service is good on both airlines. Different styles though. JL is a little robotic, but you know what you're getting. CX can have exceptional crew and some that are so so.

IFE, CX wins hands down and blows them away in this department. However, I sleep most of the way.

Ultimately, most important for me is frequency. If I miss a flight on CX, at least I know I have a few options to work with. JL simply doesn't have it and if you're trying to connect and you miss it, good chance you're spending a night in NRT or HND.
77W_12A is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 4:39 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,431
I've only flown JAL F; CX has been on my list but haven't done it yet. The only other international F I've flown is Asiana, which gave me a warmer feeling then JAL did, but I attributed that to a relatively empty cabin and the fact that it was my first F experience.

Anyway, what makes CX IFE blow away JAL? I flew JAL in early July and they had a good array of America movies and 23" screens.
DaveInLA is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 6:11 pm
  #5  
formerly gemini573
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LAX, HKG, and BKK
Programs: CX Emerald, WOH Globalist, Marriott Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, Virtuoso, Prive, STEPS, STARS
Posts: 2,233
Originally Posted by DaveInLA
I've only flown JAL F; CX has been on my list but haven't done it yet. The only other international F I've flown is Asiana, which gave me a warmer feeling then JAL did, but I attributed that to a relatively empty cabin and the fact that it was my first F experience.

Anyway, what makes CX IFE blow away JAL? I flew JAL in early July and they had a good array of America movies and 23" screens.
There's A LOT more selection to choose from...not just American television series and movies. A decent selection of UK, Hindi, Mandarin, Korean, Japanese, and of course Cantonese tv series. Plus, I find the interface easier to navigate.

Last edited by 77W_12A; Aug 23, 2015 at 6:45 pm
77W_12A is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 6:41 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
I agree. JL IFE is lacking.
And JL flight attendants don't really speak English. Well, let's put it this way. You wouldn't want to be stuck with them for a conversation partner.
s0ssos is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 8:13 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW or Somewhere Else
Programs: UA Plt /Delta DM/ Marriott Platinum Prem./Hilton Diamond / Hyatt Globalist /Hertz PS / National EE
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by DaveInLA
I've only flown JAL F; CX has been on my list but haven't done it yet. The only other international F I've flown is Asiana, which gave me a warmer feeling then JAL did, but I attributed that to a relatively empty cabin and the fact that it was my first F experience.

Anyway, what makes CX IFE blow away JAL? I flew JAL in early July and they had a good array of America movies and 23" screens.
What is an array to you? JAL had 10-12 movies in english and less than 10 TV shows. I would say CX had over 100 movies in english and HUNDREDS of TV shows.
aero0729 is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 9:10 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Programs: AA (PLATINUM), HHonors (DIAMOND)
Posts: 1,068
JAL vs CX F Infighting comparison

You don't need to press the "call button" for service on JAL.
flyer121 is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2015, 9:18 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,431
Originally Posted by aero0729
What is an array to you? JAL had 10-12 movies in english and less than 10 TV shows. I would say CX had over 100 movies in english and HUNDREDS of TV shows.
I see. Now that I think back, the collection wasn't huge, but I had no trouble findings a couple good movies to watch on my 10 hour flight (Run All Night, Chappie-- both movies on my to-rent list anyway).
DaveInLA is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2015, 3:39 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,753
Originally Posted by aero0729
Crew - The worst CX crew I've had beats the JAL crew I had. Very poor English speaking skills. Constantly brought wrong order , would take things away before I wanted them taken away and overall hard to communicate. I think they meant well and we're there promptly when needed but just didn't feel as warm and welcome as on CX where I have always found crews speak superb English.
Yes, but remember that CX is from HKG, a former British colony, where English is spoken. I don't see this as the fault of the JL crew. Won't be much different on any airline from any non-English speaking country in Asia, NH, for example.

Originally Posted by aero0729
Food - CX. Oh I'm gonna here some pushback on this one!! CX by 10 miles !!! JAL food just didn't do it for me. It was presented well and I'm sure it's all very expensive but the variety,flavor and ability to meet my more western palette was far exceeded by CX.
So you're not saying that the food on JL isn't as good as or better than that on CX, just that you don't like it, -- a matter of personal taste and preference.

Originally Posted by aero0729
JAL was lacking a normal western salad option.
Again, I see that as cultural, not a fail for JL.

Originally Posted by aero0729
Desserts on JAL were not very good except for the macaroons.
Again, you may not like the JL desserts, but others do.

Originally Posted by aero0729
- Drinks. OK. JAL takes the cake here. No doubt both have great drink menus. But JAL has some very exotic rare teas, sakes and Champagne. I like the taste of Krug over Salon but I think most like Salon more (probably due to its price tag) CX does have Hong kong milk tea and better Vodkas so still to each it's own. But overall JAL wins.
I would agree here. No sake on CX, of course. And the tea selection on JL is much better.

Originally Posted by aero0729
Cabin comfort - At first the JAL cabin was kept warm. Then I woke up sweating. They turn up the furnace overnight.
Yup, completely agree.

Originally Posted by aero0729
Bathrooms - CX much nicer bathrooms with real linen towels and nicer furnishing.
They're cotton, not linen on CX.

Originally Posted by aero0729
Overall. CX all the way.
I prefer CX for cabin temperature, if nothing else.

Originally Posted by aero0729
I may even take AA over JAL.
Never!!

Originally Posted by aero0729
PS....IFE is no comparison. I can call this a fact and not opinion : CX IFE is in a whole other league. I think JAL had 10 or less movie options in English and non were any good. Very few TV shows and extremely difficult to operate.
Agreed.

Originally Posted by DaveInLA
I've only flown JAL F; CX has been on my list but haven't done it yet. The only other international F I've flown is Asiana, which gave me a warmer feeling then JAL did, but I attributed that to a relatively empty cabin and the fact that it was my first F experience.
IME, Asiana does give a warmer experience, empty or full F cabin.

Originally Posted by flyer121
You don't need to press the "call button" for service on JAL.
Same on Asiana. For much of the flight on OZ, they station a member of the cabin crew to stand at the back of the F cabin and watch to see if anyone needs anything. IME she would typically stand there for 10-15 minutes, then switch off. It was a little disconcerting, at first; but makes for incredible service. When I raise my head to see if there's someone around (for drink, food, whatever), she's by my seat in a second or two. Even before I would have been able to press the call button.
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2015, 9:07 am
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW or Somewhere Else
Programs: UA Plt /Delta DM/ Marriott Platinum Prem./Hilton Diamond / Hyatt Globalist /Hertz PS / National EE
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH

Again, I see that as cultural, not a fail for JL.

doesn't mater, it still impacts the experience. I am not blaming JL, just mentioning to those who prefer to have a crew they can communicate well with.

Again, you may not like the JL desserts, but others do.

Yes.. The whole post iis clearly opinion not fact (Except the IFE, its a fact that CX has more content in English than JAL)

Never!!

I got 8 hours sleep on American, 2 hours on JAL. So it depends on what you value more. Ill take sleep over sake any day when traveling half way across the world. For me I can't imagine looking forward to a flight with a hot cabin again. I would be more comfortable on AA, even if the service sucks and the food isn't so great. The food on JAL wasn't that good to me anyway and the crew did not feel comfortable communicating with me so although they tried the level of service I received was very poor compared to those who can speak Japanese.
.
,
aero0729 is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2015, 10:05 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: LAX, LGB, SNA
Programs: AA EXP OWE, DL DM ST+, AS MVPG, UA, BA, WN CP, Hyatt E, Ritz Plat, HH GM
Posts: 3,185
AA over JL? That's hilarious.
hiima is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2015, 12:37 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW or Somewhere Else
Programs: UA Plt /Delta DM/ Marriott Platinum Prem./Hilton Diamond / Hyatt Globalist /Hertz PS / National EE
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by hiima
AA over JL? That's hilarious.
Why? AA is not fancy at all but the seat is PERFECT for sleeping.
aero0729 is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2015, 3:06 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,753
Originally Posted by aero0729
Why? AA is not fancy at all but the seat is PERFECT for sleeping.
Compared to the CX F seat/bed?
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2015, 11:16 pm
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW or Somewhere Else
Programs: UA Plt /Delta DM/ Marriott Platinum Prem./Hilton Diamond / Hyatt Globalist /Hertz PS / National EE
Posts: 1,107
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
Compared to the CX F seat/bed?
Not comparing to CX. Comparing to JL. JL cabin was too hot to be comfortable in
aero0729 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.