Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Which airlines would you recommend for DONE4?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Which airlines would you recommend for DONE4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2012, 1:00 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Which airlines would you recommend for DONE4?

Dear flyers, thank you for reading this thread!

I am planning an ex-JNB or ex-AMM DONE4 RTW this year
My major itinerary would be
JNB or AMM-LHR-(MAD)-LIM-SCL-JFK-HKG-DXB
or - SYD -JNB or AMM

My question is that which airline provide better J cabin experience, especially for long flight.
For example:
IB, BA, LA provide flights connecting europe and south America,
which provide best J cabin experience? or best lounge?

JL, CX, AA all provide cross pacific flight from NA to Asia, which provide better J cabin?

LA and QF provide SCL-SYD
LA is operating with A340
QF is operating with 744
Which provide better J ?

Besides, for IB and BA, which is better in service, flight accuracy or even lounge ?

Thank you again who read this thread!
medarchies is offline  
Old Jan 29, 2012, 2:04 am
  #2  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
SCL-SYD non stop on QF. J seats will be flat or sloping (depends on the retrofit of the 744 equipment.

SCL-AKL-SYD one stop on LA. J seats are flat. The stop may be a grind if you manage to sleep. If LA is really late leaving SCL, it will stop in AKL and you'll be put on a QF, NZ or EK flight to get you over to SYD. This allows that LA aircraft to regain its schedule for the return AKL-SCL sector.

The QF flight may fly further south than LA and you might have a chance of seeing Antarctica (but YMMV).

Although I prefer the LA service and quietness of their 343 aircraft, you might be better off on QF. But QF don't serve pisco sours.
og is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2012, 9:36 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Programs: QF PL (OW Emerald) Lifetime Gold; HGP Explorist; SPG Gold; HH Diamond
Posts: 198
SCL - SYD

If time is not an issue, the LAN flight via AKL wins hands down over the QF direct flight. Better hard product by a long way, and the service is pretty good as well.

Haven't looked, but the points/status earn might also be slightly better with the stop over.
dtm1 is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 3:11 am
  #4  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,530
Originally Posted by dtm1
SCL - SYD

If time is not an issue, the LAN flight via AKL wins hands down over the QF direct flight. Better hard product by a long way, and the service is pretty good as well.

Haven't looked, but the points/status earn might also be slightly better with the stop over.
If crediting to the QF program, SYD-SCL = 180 SCs in Biz class. SYD-AKL-SCL = 240 SCs in Biz. But this only works if the SYD-AKL and AKL-SCL are separate segments (ie two ticket coupons). Great Circle Mapper will show the miles for each option http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=syd-akl...l&MS=wls&DU=mi
og is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2012, 5:57 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stuck on this planet - mainly in STR and LAX
Posts: 5,019
To answer your question about CX vs. AA: CX wins in basically every aspect in my opinion, even if you get the older herringbone style seats.
These older seats are a bit small, but go flat and are much better for sleeping. The new seats are significantly better. AA has sloping seats. Food and service is better on CX.

If you have a choice between AA and LAN: LAN

The only advantage AA has: upgrades to F.
Unterwegs is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.