Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > OMNI > OMNI
Use your Facebook account to securely log into this site! Click the logo to log in! Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 14, 04, 8:55 pm   #1
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the home of the "brave"?
Programs: Whatever will get me out of Y and into C or F!
Posts: 3,679
Exclamation West Virginia: Couple in anti-Bush T-shirts were arrested at president’s speech

A husband and wife who wore anti-Bush T-shirts to the president’s Fourth of July appearance aren’t going down without a fight: They will be represented by lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union as they contest the trespassing charges against them Thursday morning in Charleston Municipal Court.

Police took Nicole and Jeff Rank away in handcuffs from the event, which was billed as a presidential appearance, not a campaign rally. They were wearing T-shirts that read, “Love America, Hate Bush.”

Spectators who wore pro-Bush T-shirts and Bush-Cheney campaign buttons were allowed to stay.

(snip)

After police arrested the Ranks, fingerprinted them and took their mug shots, FEMA told Nicole Rank she was no longer needed in West Virginia.

“I have not been fired per se,” she said. “But I was released from this job. And when they release you from a job, you no longer get paid.”

(snip)

Since Bush took office in early 2001, people have been banned from displaying anti-Bush messages at dozens of Bush appearances across the country. In September, the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit against the Secret Service, seeking an injunction against the Bush administration for segregating protesters at his public appearances.

The Secret Service agreed that such censorship was wrong, said Witold Walczak, one of the lawyers that filed the lawsuit.

“They had an internal memo dated September 2002, saying they couldn’t treat protesters differently or worse” than anyone else at a presidential appearance,

http://www.wvgazettemail.com/section/News/2004071346
HeHateY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 6:24 am   #2
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ATL
Programs: No status no more, no where, no how.
Posts: 9,939
How interesting.
Just Passing Thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 6:46 am   #3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeHateY
A husband and wife who wore anti-Bush T-shirts to the president’s Fourth of July appearance aren’t going down without a fight: They will be represented by lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union as they contest the trespassing charges against them Thursday morning in Charleston Municipal Court.

Police took Nicole and Jeff Rank away in handcuffs from the event, which was billed as a presidential appearance, not a campaign rally. They were wearing T-shirts that read, “Love America, Hate Bush.”

Spectators who wore pro-Bush T-shirts and Bush-Cheney campaign buttons were allowed to stay.
NO wonder Bush unbcluding his daddy and their party hates ACLU. We all know Dukakais was acard carrying ACLU member.
__________________
Those who sacrifice liberty of some to purchase a little temporary safety, will have neither liberty nor safety.
Yaatri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 6:53 am   #4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 22,246
This is nothing new. There have been quite a few people who get arrested for having anti-Bush signs or wearing anti-Bush t-shirts, whilst pro-Bush people right next to them are not hassled at all.

This is the kind of America Bush wants to see.
Doppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 7:25 am   #5
PG
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: IAD
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 11,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doppy
This is nothing new. There have been quite a few people who get arrested for having anti-Bush signs or wearing anti-Bush t-shirts, whilst pro-Bush people right next to them are not hassled at all.

This is the kind of America Bush wants to see.
This is certainly news to me. This kind of action may be prevalant in Communist/dictatorial regimes, but is totally un-American.
PG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 7:39 am   #6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, UA 1P, MR/SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 18,876
When I lived in Washington D.C., I had 2 buddies who showed up at a Clinton appearance with anti-Clinton signs. They were hassled by the Secret Service, had their signs taken, and were shooed off. Not wanting to take on the SS, they remained peaceful and left the scene on their own.

I think these situations speak more about the practices of the Secret Service than they do about the president or either political party. The SS certainly has a lot of leeway when it comes to protecting the POTUS - leeway that other cops (even the FBI) don't seem to have. I think that crosses the line when they get into hassling obviously-peaceful protesters, but then again they probably define "obviously-peaceful" differently than I do.

I still think they were wrong in this case to arrest the two T-shirt wearers.
pinniped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 8:19 am   #7
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 18,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinniped

I still think they were wrong in this case to arrest the two T-shirt wearers.
I agree, but not having been there myself to witness the actions/reactions, I will not make a call whether or not they needed to be detained.

This is kind of like the KKK showing up at an NAACP Rally and being surprised when they get rocks thrown at them.
underpressure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 8:30 am   #8
PG
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: IAD
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 11,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by underpressure
This is kind of like the KKK showing up at an NAACP Rally and being surprised when they get rocks thrown at them.
Bad analogy. Someone who wears an anti-Bush shirt can in no way be compared to the KKK. Whatever happened to the right to public dissent?
PG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 8:34 am   #9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by underpressure
This is kind of like the KKK showing up at an NAACP Rally and being surprised when they get rocks thrown at them.
Are you serious?
__________________
Those who sacrifice liberty of some to purchase a little temporary safety, will have neither liberty nor safety.
Yaatri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 8:45 am   #10
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Home
Programs: UA 101K , Hilton Diamond, *wood Gold, Marriott Gold, Hertz 5* and PC since 1985
Posts: 5,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by underpressure
I agree, but not having been there myself to witness the actions/reactions, I will not make a call whether or not they needed to be detained.

This is kind of like the KKK showing up at an NAACP Rally and being surprised when they get rocks thrown at them.
Don't forget to post something about Nazi's and Gay marriage.
never mind....
__________________
Travel & Geek
This Space for Rent
BDLORD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 8:47 am   #11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, UA 1P, MR/SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 18,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by PG
Bad analogy. Someone who wears an anti-Bush shirt can in no way be compared to the KKK. Whatever happened to the right to public dissent?
I agree...the key difference is that it is common and accepted for people to show up at appearances by their political opponents to peacefully protest. We do it for both right and left causes, and the right to do so is Constitutionally protected provided we do it peacefully and tastefully.

The KKK shows up mainly looking to start a streetbrawl. I don't doubt that peaceful protests can take place at NAACP conventions, but the KKK is a bad example.
pinniped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 8:51 am   #12
Moderator: Travel Technology & Travel Photography
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 38,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by underpressure
I agree, but not having been there myself to witness the actions/reactions, I will not make a call whether or not they needed to be detained.

This is kind of like the KKK showing up at an NAACP Rally and being surprised when they get rocks thrown at them.
Don't you think that just for once it would be possible for a Bush supporter to admit it's wrong? I'm sure it's possible that there is more to this case than meets the eye, but still... The KKK analogy is kind of silly...

This wasn't an NAACP rally, it was the US government taking them away, not some private organisation.
ScottC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 9:04 am   #13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, UA 1P, MR/SPG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 18,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottC
Don't you think that just for once it would be possible for a Bush supporter to admit it's wrong? I'm sure it's possible that there is more to this case than meets the eye, but still...
I'm not a Bush supporter, but underpressure's initial take about actions/reactions makes sense. We really don't know the whole story or whether the T-shirt-wearers were provoking confrontation. I suspect that if you wear a T-shirt advocating a hate message, you might also be one to seek out confrontation. I'm not justifying the actions of the agents, but it is possible that these two detainees are not without blame.
pinniped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 9:05 am   #14
Moderator: Travel Technology & Travel Photography
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 38,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinniped
I'm not a Bush supporter, but underpressure's initial take about actions/reactions makes sense. We really don't know the whole story or whether the T-shirt-wearers were provoking confrontation. I suspect that if you wear a T-shirt advocating a hate message, you might also be one to seek out confrontation. I'm not justifying the actions of the agents, but it is possible that these two detainees are not without blame.
Yes, if it were a KKK t-shirt yes. Or a competing sports team t-shirt in their seats.

But in a public place, arrested by the governement? That is a totally different ballgame.
ScottC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 04, 9:11 am   #15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DFW, AA, Hilton
Posts: 10,639
Can we please focus our priorities on fighting a war against Al Qaeda and terrorists? But it seems our government is equally or more afraid of Americans who are simply expressing their free speech. Recent attempt to ban gay marriages also gives the impression that the government really is afraid of gay people too.
ChaseTheMiles is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:45 pm.

Contact Us - FlyerTalk - Archive - Top



SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2