Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Newsstand

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 6, 09, 1:28 am   #1
Hvr
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: QC SG
Posts: 476
240,000 dollars awarded to man forced to cover Arab T-shirt

Quote:
An airline passenger forced to cover his T-shirt because it displayed Arabic script has been awarded 240,000 dollars in compensation, campaigners said Monday.

Raed Jarrar received the pay out on Friday from two US Transportation Security Authority officials and from JetBlue Airways following the August 2006 incident at New York's JFK Airport, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announced.
Not enough and I bet those responsible don't have to cough up but at least it is a start in the right direction.
Hvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 1:56 am   #2
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Programs: BA EC Gold
Posts: 3,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hvr View Post
Not enough and I bet those responsible don't have to cough up but at least it is a start in the right direction.
Fantastic. I hope this gets more coverage. It's about time the lunacy taking over the US is seriously curtailed.
ajax is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 8:19 am   #3
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Citizen of the world
Programs: Aeroplan,Skymiles, HiltonHonors, SPG
Posts: 1,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hvr View Post
Not enough and I bet those responsible don't have to cough up but at least it is a start in the right direction.
Amen
__________________
Ubuntu- "I am because you are"
dodo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 8:24 am   #4
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CLE
Posts: 143
Although it's a really bad thing, that guy doesn't deserve $240,000 for being forced to cover up his shirt. I'm sure attorneys collected a large portion of that too. They definitely deserve to be punished for around this amount but I don't think the recipients incurred damages in anywhere near that amount.
__________________
The poorest guy in F. Thanks, Flyertalk!
johnnybgood3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 8:37 am   #5
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL, BHM, DUB, County Wexford
Programs: DL PM, AA ExPlt, basic US and others.
Posts: 1,534
Very bad decision.
__________________
God is good all the time!
Are you a good ambassador!
EasternTraveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 10:11 am   #6
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Programs: UA 1K, CO Silver, NW Gold, IC Ambassador, SPG Gold
Posts: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnybgood3 View Post
Although it's a really bad thing, that guy doesn't deserve $240,000 for being forced to cover up his shirt. I'm sure attorneys collected a large portion of that too. They definitely deserve to be punished for around this amount but I don't think the recipients incurred damages in anywhere near that amount.
The problem is, the only thing these big companies understand is money. They don't respect personal rights, or common sense, ethics, or morals, or anything else. Unless you cost them money, they simply won't change their behavior.

It's pretty clear that the amount is punitive, not compensatory. I only hope that it's high enough for JetBlue not to even think about doing this again.
__________________
My FlightMemory ~ NW miles left to burn: 462
mikew99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 11:48 am   #7
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, CHI, ?
Programs: Lowly CO Silver, Hilton Gold somehow, AGR moocher via CO
Posts: 3,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnybgood3 View Post
Although it's a really bad thing, that guy doesn't deserve $240,000 for being forced to cover up his shirt. I'm sure attorneys collected a large portion of that too. They definitely deserve to be punished for around this amount but I don't think the recipients incurred damages in anywhere near that amount.
The lawyers are the ones who did the grunt work necessary to get this award. They were the ones fighting the inane injustice, and they should be compensated for that. To suggest otherwise is to suggest that only wealthy people with plenty of free time should ever mount a challenge against this kind of injustice.
__________________
My Flights @ OpenFights (lacks historical accuracy).
ralfp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 11:55 am   #8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO, CDG, PBI
Programs: UA-1P, HH Silver, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & now a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 10,017
and also being discussed over here (post 145) in a rather lengthy thread which covers the actual incident
__________________
just my humble opinion but i used to try and stop hockey pucks so what do i know . Nighthawks fans are everywhere
goalie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 1:24 pm   #9
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA-UK-UAE
Programs: UA(1K), AA(Gold), QR, Marriott(Plat), Hilton(Diamond)
Posts: 5,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasternTraveler View Post
Very bad decision.
Completely agree. He should gave gotten at least ten times that amount and should also have been able to sue the individuals, as opposed to the "man" - a very, very inadequate payout indeed. Justice has not been served.
__________________
...
PhlyingRPh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 1:27 pm   #10
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 541
I believe that damages paid to the "victim" should be limited to something that is commensurate with suffering inflicted. Probably 0.1% of that amount (i.e. $240) should be enough for having to cover up his T-shirt.

However, I would like to see total damages payable by the officials, TSA bosses and TSA to be multiplied by 10 from the current sum to $2,400,000, with two officials footing 10% each, bosses of TSA 40%, and TSA as an organisation footing the rest.
It should then hurt enough for them not to behave in a similar way again.

I'd then like to see the money going to a proper good cause (that does not mean anything to do with moronic security measures - perhaps 'save lots of puppy dogs funds' or something), or split up and refunded to taxpayers of the US assuming the TSA is funded by tax.

But that'll never happen.
AusEuroFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 1:45 pm   #11
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, CHI, ?
Programs: Lowly CO Silver, Hilton Gold somehow, AGR moocher via CO
Posts: 3,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by AusEuroFlyer View Post
I believe that damages paid to the "victim" should be limited to something that is commensurate with suffering inflicted. Probably 0.1% of that amount (i.e. $240) should be enough for having to cover up his T-shirt.
You realize that this would make it impossible for any non-wealthy person to take this kind of action? $240 would probably come nowhere near covering his expenses (transport, communication, time) for the lawsuit.

$240k is nothing to the airlines and the TSA. The guy in question will probably see no more than a small fraction of this money anyways.
__________________
My Flights @ OpenFights (lacks historical accuracy).
ralfp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 3:24 pm   #12
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralfp View Post
You realize that this would make it impossible for any non-wealthy person to take this kind of action? $240 would probably come nowhere near covering his expenses (transport, communication, time) for the lawsuit.

$240k is nothing to the airlines and the TSA. The guy in question will probably see no more than a small fraction of this money anyways.
The costs/expenses to be covered by the defendants - I was only talking about damages that the plaintiff receives 'in hand' so to speak. It's obvious that costs/expenses can't be covered by $240.
AusEuroFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 3:42 pm   #13
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MYOFB
Programs: Asiana Gold
Posts: 1,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikew99 View Post
The problem is, the only thing these big companies understand is money. They don't respect personal rights, or common sense, ethics, or morals, or anything else. Unless you cost them money, they simply won't change their behavior.

It's pretty clear that the amount is punitive, not compensatory. I only hope that it's high enough for JetBlue not to even think about doing this again.
As much as I like jetBlue this isn't enough. The person should have been awarded at least 10x what was awarded plus legal and court costs.
__________________
"About this time, they tell you you'll be landing shortly. Does that sound to you like we're gonna miss the runway?"
stupidhead is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 4:37 pm   #14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing
Posts: 51,216
$2.4 million would have been better. At least then airline shareholders would start paying attention more.
__________________
This game is not as much fun as it used to be: 2008/2009 Frequent Flyer Program Fleecing Award goes to Delta Airlines
GUWonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 5:07 pm   #15
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, CHI, ?
Programs: Lowly CO Silver, Hilton Gold somehow, AGR moocher via CO
Posts: 3,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by AusEuroFlyer View Post
The costs/expenses to be covered by the defendants - I was only talking about damages that the plaintiff receives 'in hand' so to speak. It's obvious that costs/expenses can't be covered by $240.
I was not aware that plaintiff's costs, such as lost work hours, gas, phone bills, mailing costs, etc., were covered by the defendants (other than coming out of the award).
__________________
My Flights @ OpenFights (lacks historical accuracy).
ralfp is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:03 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0