Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Newsstand

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 25, 08, 8:04 am   #1
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ITO/Mauna Kea, NYC, EBB
Programs: ST E+, *A, OW
Posts: 4,198
Question Comair 5191: Lawyer says pax should have known it was dangerous...

http://www.kentucky.com/211/story/297109.html

Quote:
James Polehinke's lawyer asserted that the passengers killed in the Aug. 27, 2006, crash should have known that Blue Grass Airport was dangerous because of considerable media coverage of a massive runway construction project there. They should have known the air traffic control tower was understaffed, that airports in Louisville and Northern Kentucky are safer and that taking off in the dark is dangerous, wrote William E. Johnson, a well-known attorney from Frankfort.
He now says he'll be withdrawing that defense...

I wonder whether the airlines will be updating their contracts of carriage to note that why yes, you really should know that hurtling through the sky in an aluminum tube at 500+ mph, 6-8 miles above the ground, does have certain risks associated with it, and that if you die as a result, they're not liable?

Especially if you take off in the dark! Oooh, scary!
__________________
I think of Delta as the New Worldwide Airline.

Last edited by DanTravels; Jan 25, 08 at 8:14 am.
DanTravels is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:17 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0