Asia runs, always 6 day min?
#16
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: UA Lifetime Global Services
Posts: 407
November 2003 was the last time I remember only a Saturday night stay required for the most economical fares to Asia. At that time, there appeared to be a major policy shift in restrictions for Asian leisure fares.
It always seemed inconsistent to me why the airlines only require a Saturday night stay to be eligible for the most economical fares from US to Europe, while they require a 6 day minimum for the most economical fares from US to Asia.
koppelman
It always seemed inconsistent to me why the airlines only require a Saturday night stay to be eligible for the most economical fares from US to Europe, while they require a 6 day minimum for the most economical fares from US to Asia.
koppelman
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
#19
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: Lapsed DL North PE, now nothing
Posts: 701
Yes, if I find one I will definitely post it. And thanks much for all the help and interesting discussion.
#20
Join Date: Feb 2002
Programs: UA-Gold MM, SPG Plat
Posts: 426
I realize UA doesn't fly to CAN...yet However, the published routing which allows travel HKG-YY-CAN, takes that into account and that's why I mentioned the fare. For mileage run purposes, one would get UA flights as far as HKG for $558+tax.
But after more careful checking, it seem that the Flight Application part of the Fare Rules require travel on UA1-UA1699 within Region 3, which effectively renders this fare useless. Maybe some political motivation on UA's part(what a great benefit to the public it would have been if the DOT awarded SFO-CAN to UA), or just an oversight?
If the Flight Application limitation is just a mistake, then by bringing it to the attention of the Rate Desk one might have some success....who knows.
#21
Join Date: Dec 2006
Programs: SPG Plat, Hyatt Diamond, UA, AA, DL, BA, CX
Posts: 491
One thing I found is that some Asian airlines don't have minimum stay requirement for US-Asia flights. One example is Delta's partner - China Airlines. However, you don't get MQM and certainly get nothing on NW WP. My guess is that you can fly to west coast cities that KE serves to, such as SEA, LAX, and SFO, and take their flights to Asia. I did try to find their fare rule but the rule only indicates max stay. Worth some further investigation if that's what you want.
#22
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: Lapsed DL North PE, now nothing
Posts: 701
Interesting idea, which hopefully will be fruitful for someone else. My main goal is a straight MR for WP EQMs. A SIN MR is often talked about on this board, and it's something I'd like to add to the list of things I've done.
#23
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Programs: Aeroplan; PriorityClub
Posts: 934
How about a 0 minimum - 1 year max?!
Call your travel agent [I am one.] and ask for CONSOLIDATOR fares on Air Canada to cities served by AC like HKG, NRT, KIX, BJS, PVG, etc.?
In addition, they are priced at less than published fares. I was checking these out for doing a MR myself and can tell you that they were there all of 2006. Because of scheduling, I found that for HKG that you will have to spend one night there and fly out the next day - and prices in HKG are not for believing, that is, ultra-high.
These are eligible for accumulation on Mileage Plus AFAIK.
In addition, they are priced at less than published fares. I was checking these out for doing a MR myself and can tell you that they were there all of 2006. Because of scheduling, I found that for HKG that you will have to spend one night there and fly out the next day - and prices in HKG are not for believing, that is, ultra-high.
These are eligible for accumulation on Mileage Plus AFAIK.
#24
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 6,422
That's pretty clever, albeit intense! If your city pairs differed (e.g., SIN-CHI nested inside NYC-SIN), you should be able to do this on the same alliance, right?
I'll re-ask the question -- has anyone ever done this??
#25
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chitown
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 149
Steve, are you suggesting doing a run from say, NYC-SIN on skyteam, leaving on a Friday and coming back the following Sunday (Day 1 and Day 10), with a second run scheduled from SIN-NYC on oneworld, leaving on Sunday and returning on Friday (Day 3 and Day 8), so that you would -- in theory -- be able to work during the week without taking time off?
That's pretty clever, albeit intense! If your city pairs differed (e.g., SIN-CHI nested inside NYC-SIN), you should be able to do this on the same alliance, right?
I'll re-ask the question -- has anyone ever done this??
That's pretty clever, albeit intense! If your city pairs differed (e.g., SIN-CHI nested inside NYC-SIN), you should be able to do this on the same alliance, right?
I'll re-ask the question -- has anyone ever done this??
#27
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MCI
Programs: AA EXP (1.5MM), Hilton/SPG/Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,335
#28
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chitown
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 149
I guess it depends on United. Since it is not a strict A to B and B to A scenario, you might be able to get away with it. However, if they hassle you at the airport, you could always say your only other option was to take another airline, see what they say. But technically, you are still using the tickets out of order so not sure if they even look for this with differing airport codes. Probably easy to spot though.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
But it's going to cost me $$ to get back from PVD airport to home.
From BOS, the Logan Express is handy and affordable for $10. :-:
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
I guess it depends on United. Since it is not a strict A to B and B to A scenario, you might be able to get away with it. However, if they hassle you at the airport, you could always say your only other option was to take another airline, see what they say. But technically, you are still using the tickets out of order so not sure if they even look for this with differing airport codes. Probably easy to spot though.
Seriously, if I change the ticket 2 as follows
HKG-PVD
PVD/BOS-HKG
then the end-to-end rule is no longer violated right?