Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals
Reload this Page >

Asia runs, always 6 day min?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Asia runs, always 6 day min?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2006, 12:53 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: UA Lifetime Global Services
Posts: 407
November 2003 was the last time I remember only a Saturday night stay required for the most economical fares to Asia. At that time, there appeared to be a major policy shift in restrictions for Asian leisure fares.

It always seemed inconsistent to me why the airlines only require a Saturday night stay to be eligible for the most economical fares from US to Europe, while they require a 6 day minimum for the most economical fares from US to Asia.

koppelman
koppelman is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2006, 4:27 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Programs: UA-Gold MM, SPG Plat
Posts: 426
UA: ORD-CAN $558+tax

This is a long-standing fare, with a 3 day minimum stay.
-WXPRO10/WWPRO10 fare basis.
-Curiously, AA and NW have the same price, but 6 day min. stay
merlin is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2006, 8:59 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by merlin
This is a long-standing fare, with a 3 day minimum stay.
-WXPRO10/WWPRO10 fare basis.
-Curiously, AA and NW have the same price, but 6 day min. stay
UA does not serve CAN.

ORD-CAN involves Air China code share and the fares are at least $1100 or more.
kb1992 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2006, 9:25 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: Lapsed DL North PE, now nothing
Posts: 701
Originally Posted by myfrogger
I think October 18th was the last day I remember seeing a 3 day minimum.
Originally Posted by koppelman
November 2003 was the last time I remember only a Saturday night stay required for the most economical fares to Asia. At that time, there appeared to be a major policy shift in restrictions for Asian leisure fares.
From these comments I am assuming that (1) There sometimes are 3 day mins on NWA/Skyteam flights to Asia, but not right now, and (2) Prior to 11/03 there were affordable quick turns to Asia on NW/Skyteam but no longer.

Yes, if I find one I will definitely post it. And thanks much for all the help and interesting discussion.
lotalota is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2006, 1:26 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Programs: UA-Gold MM, SPG Plat
Posts: 426
Originally Posted by kb1992
UA does not serve CAN.

ORD-CAN involves Air China code share and the fares are at least $1100 or more.
Sorry, I never tried to price an itinerary using this particular fare. Of course you are right that it is not bookable.

I realize UA doesn't fly to CAN...yet However, the published routing which allows travel HKG-YY-CAN, takes that into account and that's why I mentioned the fare. For mileage run purposes, one would get UA flights as far as HKG for $558+tax.

But after more careful checking, it seem that the Flight Application part of the Fare Rules require travel on UA1-UA1699 within Region 3, which effectively renders this fare useless. Maybe some political motivation on UA's part(what a great benefit to the public it would have been if the DOT awarded SFO-CAN to UA), or just an oversight?

If the Flight Application limitation is just a mistake, then by bringing it to the attention of the Rate Desk one might have some success....who knows.
merlin is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2006, 4:24 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Programs: SPG Plat, Hyatt Diamond, UA, AA, DL, BA, CX
Posts: 491
One thing I found is that some Asian airlines don't have minimum stay requirement for US-Asia flights. One example is Delta's partner - China Airlines. However, you don't get MQM and certainly get nothing on NW WP. My guess is that you can fly to west coast cities that KE serves to, such as SEA, LAX, and SFO, and take their flights to Asia. I did try to find their fare rule but the rule only indicates max stay. Worth some further investigation if that's what you want.
ycc777 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2006, 4:28 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: Lapsed DL North PE, now nothing
Posts: 701
Originally Posted by ycc777
One thing I found is that some Asian airlines don't have minimum stay requirement for US-Asia flights. However, you don't get MQM and certainly get nothing on NW WP.
Interesting idea, which hopefully will be fruitful for someone else. My main goal is a straight MR for WP EQMs. A SIN MR is often talked about on this board, and it's something I'd like to add to the list of things I've done.
lotalota is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 2:11 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Programs: Aeroplan; PriorityClub
Posts: 934
How about a 0 minimum - 1 year max?!

Call your travel agent [I am one.] and ask for CONSOLIDATOR fares on Air Canada to cities served by AC like HKG, NRT, KIX, BJS, PVG, etc.?

In addition, they are priced at less than published fares. I was checking these out for doing a MR myself and can tell you that they were there all of 2006. Because of scheduling, I found that for HKG that you will have to spend one night there and fly out the next day - and prices in HKG are not for believing, that is, ultra-high.

These are eligible for accumulation on Mileage Plus AFAIK.
thefareguru is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 2:27 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 6,422
Originally Posted by sbagdon
I've raised the question of nesting tickets across alliances, but heard nothing back. Considering a well planned SIN run will net almost an Elite level, if you're doing MRs across two airlines in different alliances, seems like a good plan.

Steve B.
Steve, are you suggesting doing a run from say, NYC-SIN on skyteam, leaving on a Friday and coming back the following Sunday (Day 1 and Day 10), with a second run scheduled from SIN-NYC on oneworld, leaving on Sunday and returning on Friday (Day 3 and Day 8), so that you would -- in theory -- be able to work during the week without taking time off?

That's pretty clever, albeit intense! If your city pairs differed (e.g., SIN-CHI nested inside NYC-SIN), you should be able to do this on the same alliance, right?

I'll re-ask the question -- has anyone ever done this??
3timesalady is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 2:54 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chitown
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 149
Originally Posted by 3timesalady
Steve, are you suggesting doing a run from say, NYC-SIN on skyteam, leaving on a Friday and coming back the following Sunday (Day 1 and Day 10), with a second run scheduled from SIN-NYC on oneworld, leaving on Sunday and returning on Friday (Day 3 and Day 8), so that you would -- in theory -- be able to work during the week without taking time off?

That's pretty clever, albeit intense! If your city pairs differed (e.g., SIN-CHI nested inside NYC-SIN), you should be able to do this on the same alliance, right?

I'll re-ask the question -- has anyone ever done this??
I haven't but it is perfectly legal since the "tariff rules" would not apply across different airlines. I stilll call it BS that they crack down on back to back ticketing, since I can easily take another airline back, their lose. The only problem being finding a decent price on the SIN-CHI (or SIN-NYC) ticket. Anyone know if the consolidator fares from Asia to US earn miles and where I can find them online?
tazan007 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 3:04 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Is this legal, both tickets are on UA?

Ticket 1.

1/1 BOS-PVG
3/1 PVG-BOS

Ticket 2.

1/3 HKG-BOS
2/25 BOS-HKG
kb1992 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 3:32 pm
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MCI
Programs: AA EXP (1.5MM), Hilton/SPG/Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,335
Originally Posted by kb1992
Is this legal, both tickets are on UA?

Ticket 1.

1/1 BOS-PVG
3/1 PVG-BOS

Ticket 2.

1/3 HKG-BOS
2/25 BOS-HKG

Why don't you just make ticket two, PVG to PVD? This way you aren't returning to BOS, your end-to-ending to providence.
ja_user is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 3:49 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chitown
Programs: UA 1P
Posts: 149
Originally Posted by kb1992
Is this legal, both tickets are on UA?

Ticket 1.

1/1 BOS-PVG
3/1 PVG-BOS

Ticket 2.

1/3 HKG-BOS
2/25 BOS-HKG
I guess it depends on United. Since it is not a strict A to B and B to A scenario, you might be able to get away with it. However, if they hassle you at the airport, you could always say your only other option was to take another airline, see what they say. But technically, you are still using the tickets out of order so not sure if they even look for this with differing airport codes. Probably easy to spot though.
tazan007 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 3:54 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by ja_user
Why don't you just make ticket two, PVG to PVD? This way you aren't returning to BOS, your end-to-ending to providence.
I know... changing BOS to PVD in ticket 2 won't affact fare much, if any.

But it's going to cost me $$ to get back from PVD airport to home.

From BOS, the Logan Express is handy and affordable for $10. :-:
kb1992 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2007, 3:56 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
Originally Posted by tazan007
I guess it depends on United. Since it is not a strict A to B and B to A scenario, you might be able to get away with it. However, if they hassle you at the airport, you could always say your only other option was to take another airline, see what they say. But technically, you are still using the tickets out of order so not sure if they even look for this with differing airport codes. Probably easy to spot though.
Good tactic.. see what UA can say if I claim that my only other option is to fly NW.

Seriously, if I change the ticket 2 as follows

HKG-PVD
PVD/BOS-HKG

then the end-to-end rule is no longer violated right?
kb1992 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.