FlyerTalk Forums
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Mileage Run Deals (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/mileage-run-deals-372/)
-   -   UA: ZFV-LAS (or LAS-ZFV) $66 o/w -> 2.7cpm (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/mileage-run-deals/1524194-ua-zfv-las-las-zfv-66-o-w-2-7cpm.html)

kluever Nov 22, 2013 1:42 pm
UA: ZFV-LAS (or LAS-ZFV) $66 o/w -> 2.7cpm
 
ZFV-EWR-LAS for $66 = 2.9cpm
ZFV-EWR-IAH-LAS for $70 = 2.7cpm

Routes via SFO (ZFV-EWR-SFO-LAS) will only credit for ZFV-EWR-LAS since EWR-SFO-LAS is a "direct" (note: *not* "non-stop") flight from EWR-LAS and share the same flight number (814).

rainrdx Nov 22, 2013 2:29 pm
There seems to be quite a few SFO ones on march 11th

rcs85551 Nov 22, 2013 2:37 pm
N fare, 58.60 USD + Tax
Travel permitted Tue/Wed/Sat

2 transfers permitted in each direction

Routing:

Code:
TRAVEL MUST NOT BE NONSTOP                                                     
  1 * PHL/ZFV-CLT/WAS/EWR/CHI/CLE-HOU/DEN/CHI-LAS                             
  2 * ZFV-ZWI/ZVE/ZTF-CLT/WAS/EWR/CHI/CLE-HOU/DEN/CHI-LAS                     
  3 * PHL-HOU/DEN/CHI-LAS
So, if you find N class, you can squeeze in two transfers, however SFO is not allowed according to the fare rules...

regoarrarr Nov 22, 2013 2:38 pm
I find LAS-SFO-ORD-EWR-ZFV on 2/15, but it's for $86

kluever Nov 22, 2013 2:42 pm
Originally Posted by rcs85551 (Post 21835243)
So, if you find N class, you can squeeze in two transfers, however SFO is not allowed according to the fare rules...
Ahh, looks like EWR-SFO-LAS is the same flight number (814)...so I think you'll only get mileage for the direct EWR-LAS, right?

rcs85551 Nov 22, 2013 2:48 pm
Originally Posted by kluever (Post 21835266)
Ahh, looks like EWR-SFO-LAS is the same flight number (814)...so I think you'll only get mileage for the direct EWR-LAS, right?
Correct.

MileageManager Nov 22, 2013 2:56 pm
Originally Posted by rcs85551 (Post 21835298)
Correct.
Unfair! Someone who wants US Div w/ this tix could try to split into 2 segs and when submitting to US website as a retro. Let's see what happens?

MileageManager Nov 22, 2013 3:00 pm
Originally Posted by regoarrarr (Post 21835246)
I find LAS-SFO-ORD-EWR-ZFV on 2/15, but it's for $86
Found Dec 3rd ZFV-EWR-IAH-LAS is $79.85 @ 2,695 EQM = still 2.9 CPM

PV_Premier Nov 22, 2013 3:42 pm
can fly to PHL rather than train for $88

March 1 LAS-IAH-CLE-PHL

kluever Nov 22, 2013 3:46 pm
Originally Posted by PV_Premier (Post 21835596)
can fly to PHL rather than train for $88

March 1 LAS-IAH-CLE-PHL
That routing is 3.1cpm (not bad, but not as good as the train options).

PV_Premier Nov 22, 2013 4:03 pm
Originally Posted by kluever (Post 21835614)
That routing is 3.1cpm (not bad, but not as good as the train options).
$20 well spent if you actually want to go to PHL airport for one reason or another :)

in any case too much to position from SMF/RNO. the $ of positioning flights on WN is the same as the transcons even with the WN sale.

zig2 Nov 22, 2013 4:47 pm
Can i jump off at sfo?

PV_Premier Nov 22, 2013 5:21 pm
Originally Posted by zig2 (Post 21835882)
Can i jump off at sfo?
if flying it as a one way ex-PHL, yes. this is hidden city ticketing, it's frowned upon by the airlines but if not conducted frequently, its unlikely to raise any flags against your account.

kluever Nov 22, 2013 5:22 pm
Originally Posted by zig2 (Post 21835882)
Can i jump off at sfo?
Probably, but in case of IROPS or schedule changes, you might get tossed on the EWR-LAS direct flight.

Antonio8069 Nov 22, 2013 6:52 pm
Originally Posted by zig2 (Post 21835882)
Can i jump off at sfo?
Where are you seeing routing via SFO? The only availability I am seeing is non-stop EWR-LAS (works out at 3.4 cpm, excluding the rail portion).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 pm.
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.