STL Lambert was my home airport for years, but I now live in SAN. I departed earlier today after visiting family for Thanksgiving, and I hate to say that it is very depressing, despite the terminal upgrades. The checkin area was virtually empty, the temporary AC is a very poor offering, and the terminal overall just feels bare.
On the plus side, this seems to be the only airport where I'm able to clear TSA precheck.
I don't suppose Lambert will ever be what it used to be, but I just wish the energy level were a bit higher there -- part of why I enjoy traveling is the airport hustle-and-bustle. ORD was jumping this evening -- while I'm sure those departing from Chicago didn't enjoy the somewhat longer security lines, at least it feels like a real airport.
Programs: AA EXP, IC PLT RA, Hyatt Diamond, GE, NEXUS, SES
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by metallo
On the plus side, this seems to be the only airport where I'm able to clear TSA precheck.
STL is the only airport I've had precheck and been thoroughly secondary searched because of my laptop's battery charger cord. They were the first that's ever perceived my power adapter for a WMD in thousands of tries.
Terminal upgrades . . . virtually empty check-in area . . . AC (albeit a poor one)?
Sounds like a pretty good airport experience to me. Personally I prefer small, empty terminals. For me a terminal is good based on 'car-to-lounge time' and 'lounge-to-gate time'.
Sounds better than the hustle and bustle, 'jumping' atmosphere and longer lines of ORD that you describe.
But I can see how preferences can vary.
(FWIW, I have not been through STL in years, in the few years after AA acquired TWA)
You think STL is depressing fly out of SJC, San Jose International Airport... 10th largest city in America... no AC Club.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metallo
STL Lambert was my home airport for years, but I now live in SAN. I departed earlier today after visiting family for Thanksgiving, and I hate to say that it is very depressing, despite the terminal upgrades. The checkin area was virtually empty, the temporary AC is a very poor offering, and the terminal overall just feels bare.
On the plus side, this seems to be the only airport where I'm able to clear TSA precheck.
I don't suppose Lambert will ever be what it used to be, but I just wish the energy level were a bit higher there -- part of why I enjoy traveling is the airport hustle-and-bustle. ORD was jumping this evening -- while I'm sure those departing from Chicago didn't enjoy the somewhat longer security lines, at least it feels like a real airport.
I agree with the OP. STL has a "ghost-town" feeling to it. I fly through it a couple of times a year for work and even schedule the occasional connecting flight when it makes a difference tot he price. I put STL in the same category as PIT. The difference is that last time I was in PIT they had walled off a couple of the concourses which weren't fully used so you couldn't really see how far the concourse went (and how empty it was). Perhaps STL should do something similar. The last time I was there the concourses were just a never ending stretch of nothing. if I remember correctly the last time I went through MEM it was a similar feeling as well. I wonder if CVG can be lumped into that category.
The WN concourse and terminal seems more alive at STL. I always like flying through STL and also SJC as well as CVG and PIT.
Has US Airways made major cuts at PHX, I know they cut alot at LAS.
The thing about airports is that generally speaking we go there to get on or off an airplane to go somewhere else. I don't need a shiny new terminal with a gazillion restaurants and shops selling me stuff I don't want or need. I want an airport close to my origin or destination and that's easy to navigate and relatively small. The only amenities I really want are Pre Check and an AC. My two principal airports, LGA and BOS, are great airports for these reasons.
Programs: AA EXP, Amex Plat, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Plat, Global Entry, National Exec, DL HM, UA TODer
Posts: 4,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blumie
The thing about airports is that generally speaking we go there to get on or off an airplane to go somewhere else. I don't need a shiny new terminal with a gazillion restaurants and shops selling me stuff I don't want or need. I want an airport close to my origin or destination and that's easy to navigate and relatively small. The only amenities I really want are Pre Check and an AC. My two principal airports, LGA and BOS, are great airports for these reasons.
+1. As much as I enjoyed ICN (in case you wanted to know if I've ever been to a "nice" airport), airports like BOS and STL are easy to navigate. If I want a place bumping and crazy, I'd go to a nightclub .
__________________ My Flight Memory Next destinations GIG, SIN, KUL, DFW, ANCx2, ICN
I find STL to be a good place to fly in and out. Minimal security lines, clean facility, pleasant people, good proximity of rental cars. Easy in and out. This frequent traveler does not appreciate crowded terminals, long lines and pushy people and STL has none of that.
Programs: AA EXP 2MM, Lifetime Platinum, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Travelers Aid JFK Volunteer
Posts: 8,975
Good riddance. Sorry if that sounds insensitive to the STL crowd. STL's demise began with the demise of TWA. I always found STL to be a dump of an airport. Admittedly, the old Ambassador's Club was pretty nice, but AA started pulling back quickly once the acquisition was finalized.
.
Like STL
