Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > Mid-Atlantic
Reload this Page >

Noise prompts Monroeville restaurant to ban kids under 6

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Noise prompts Monroeville restaurant to ban kids under 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2011, 1:38 pm
  #1  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Noise prompts Monroeville restaurant to ban kids under 6

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt.../s_746065.html

A restaurant in Monroeville says it's no longer allowing children under age 6.

McDain's Restaurant and Golf Center says the new policy will take effect July 16.
The restaurant is outside of PIT. I've dined there a few times, although years ago. Last I knew, their dining and bar areas share a room, and the room is very open. It was a fairly small room, probably seating 50 at most, in its normal configuration, IIRC.

Thoughts on this?

My thoughts are that I'd enjoy going there more often now, and will probably make it a point to visit the next time I'm in PIT. Honestly, I wish more restaurants at least offered no-children sections, much like they did with smoking/non-smoking sections.
kipper is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2011, 8:29 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Premier Platinum; Marriott Platinum
Posts: 441
A morning drive show in DC spent their whole show talking about this. Personally, I have three kids and am fine with this. I'll just eat somewhere else when I'm with the kids.

OTOH, when I am on a $59 WN to MCO, don't give me dirty looks because my kids are talking.
Yuengling is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2011, 11:34 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
It's the restaurant's right to do this, so I've got no complaint about it. I'd just eat elsewhere, with our without my kids.

I will say that I applaud management's decision to be forthright about its feelings on the topic. Too often I've gone into run-of-the-mill (i.e., not fancy where children wouldn't ordinarily be guests) restaurants with my kids only to get some snide comment from the host/hostess/manager/owner. In at least one case, we all turned on our heels and left based on some sarcastic comment made by the staff about dining with children. If management doesn't want to host them, just adopt this place's policy.
dchristiva is offline  
Old Aug 8, 2011, 8:45 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,098
I also support "No kids" pools at hotels.

It never fails that the kids absolutely dominate the pool, get hyperactive, and keep those unlucky enough to have a room facing the pool well and truly annoyed until well after bedtime.

I don't care how "hard" it is to travel with kids. It's not my problem, it's yours. Don't make it anyone elses.
pinworm is offline  
Old Aug 9, 2011, 6:12 am
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Originally Posted by pinworm
I also support "No kids" pools at hotels.

It never fails that the kids absolutely dominate the pool, get hyperactive, and keep those unlucky enough to have a room facing the pool well and truly annoyed until well after bedtime.

I don't care how "hard" it is to travel with kids. It's not my problem, it's yours. Don't make it anyone elses.
I'd support a child fee at hotels, much like the pet fee that one has to pay at many hotels if you want to travel with your pets.
kipper is offline  
Old Aug 10, 2011, 4:00 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ORD
Programs: AAdvantage Gold, UA 2P
Posts: 953
next time in PIT, I might make a specific trip to shake the owner hand for doing this
millsdale is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2011, 2:40 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: United Airlines, Delta, Spirit, Southwest, Hertz, Marriott, Starwood
Posts: 3
I don't see the problem with this. i think that the parents with children that are not acting appropriate in a restaurant should take them outside till they settle down. Now i do want to try this place to see how well they are keeping to their own rule, and to see how the food is.
PITak is offline  
Old Aug 23, 2011, 6:56 pm
  #8  
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Eco-Conscious Travel, United and Flyertalk Cares
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,831
Sprout in Chicago has a no-kids policy (ages 12 and above welcome) at brunch, at least.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_834051.html
l etoile is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2011, 9:21 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PHX/SFO/LAX
Programs: AA-EXP (1.7MM), BA-Slvr, HH-Diamond
Posts: 7,784
^

I support this restaurant and other establishments that place limits on child admittance. Parents don't know how to parent these days, so I would rather have these rules in place beforehand.
ByrdluvsAWACO is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2011, 11:41 pm
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,098
Originally Posted by kipper
I'd support a child fee at hotels, much like the pet fee that one has to pay at many hotels if you want to travel with your pets.
It makes sense, not only for the pool and the way they ruin the dining, but because they wet the beds.
pinworm is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2011, 7:10 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Originally Posted by pinworm
It makes sense, not only for the pool and the way they ruin the dining, but because they wet the beds.
That's a good point! I never thought about that, but it's true.
kipper is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 7:01 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: south of WAS DC
Posts: 10,131
Originally Posted by pinworm
It makes sense, not only for the pool and the way they ruin the dining, but because they wet the beds.
so do old people.
slawecki is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 7:14 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Kids would be happier at Eat'n Park anyway. Don't they get free cookies or something there?
N965VJ is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 11:24 am
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Kids would be happier at Eat'n Park anyway. Don't they get free cookies or something there?
LOL, this is true. Eat 'n Park does give free smiley cookies to kids.
kipper is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2011, 4:24 am
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,189
Restaurant owner Mike Vuick said there's "nothing wrong with babies, but the fact is you can't control their volume." He said all that screaming and crying disturbs many of his customers.
If parents refuse to control their kids, the restaurant owner had no choice as these parents were causing him to lose business.
Analise is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.