Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Manufactured Spending
Reload this Page >

Looks like the new Citi Double Cash card (2%) can offer a good avenue for some of us

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Looks like the new Citi Double Cash card (2%) can offer a good avenue for some of us

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2014, 6:20 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 212
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold, UA Silver
Posts: 502
Originally Posted by Volodath
AF on Arrival is $89. 89/.002=44500. Substituting this card over Arrival only works if you spend less than that. And considering how often Citi charges CA...

I can think of exactly one avenue this card would be worthwhile with, and that's assuming the 2% payout is real.

That's just me however. It would be nice to put my obscenely high CL with Citi to use however...
I do most of my MS on my Old Amex Blue (GGD) so no need for an $89 fee Barclays Arrival+ for that extra 0.2%.
Songer5 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 6:42 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,823
Originally Posted by Frindle
Everyone that does this math forgets the one big advantage of Arrival. 0% FTF. Go international 2-3x a year and that AF will pay for itself.

I guess it's a difference of opinion. Unless your job requires you travel a lot and thus you get a bunch of miles by default, I would wager a lot of people want to collect actual miles. Unfortunately, 100k cash back points for example will not get you nearly as far traditional miles will
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 7:13 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: PHL
Posts: 930
Originally Posted by Frindle
Everyone that does this math forgets the one big advantage of Arrival. 0% FTF. Go international 2-3x a year and that AF will pay for itself.
Stop falling for all the tourist traps. Then FTF will not matter
commdiver is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 7:16 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,477
Originally Posted by LoveMountains
Why is this card so much better than Arrival, which is also Mastercard, and has 2.2% cashback?
It's rarely possible to extract 2.2% out of Arrival. You gotta be a blogger and make $25+ travel purchases ad infinitum.
Plus there's the annual fee of course.
I do love the Arrival though for the signup bonus, 0% foreign fee, and Chip & PIN.
MaxVO is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 7:25 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,823
Originally Posted by commdiver
Stop falling for all the tourist traps. Then FTF will not matter
Elaborate please? How do you skip out of the foreign fee with a card that doesn't waive it?
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 9:18 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 67
I just got my BA+ the other day. What is Barclay's reputation with retention calls? Do they give out freebies like other card do?

It seems to me AMG are getting harder and harder to unload. If that is the only GC outlet for Citi then count me out.
thehogsters is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 9:24 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 378
Originally Posted by rgAAFT
I guess it's a difference of opinion. Unless your job requires you travel a lot and thus you get a bunch of miles by default, I would wager a lot of people want to collect actual miles. Unfortunately, 100k cash back points for example will not get you nearly as far traditional miles will
How did miles come into this? We are comparing cash back cards. If this is your default card (let's assume for the case of argument that it is), then this is a big legitimate difference. Hotels, meals, shopping, etc will eat up that AF really quickly.
Frindle is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2014, 10:32 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The great Midwest
Programs: None
Posts: 67
Originally Posted by mikeyb45
Actually, 2: Serve-Isis and/or AP. Maximize both for a free $50/month, assuming one isn't using those tools for min spend or whatever. But given Citi's track record, one can imagine they will be charging CA fees for these transaction, especially when tens of thousands of people start doing this. I had considered eventually PCing my Dividend to this, but the 5% drugstores in Q1 is hard to give up.
Serve, yes, A/P... if you don't mind risking your A/P, AGC would pay out better (for more hassle of course). Plus then you lose the rounding usefulness that comes with A/P (mostly what I use them for). Those two weren't what I was thinking either (considering they don't scale)...

Originally Posted by Songer5
I do most of my MS on my Old Amex Blue (GGD) so no need for an $89 fee Barclays Arrival+ for that extra 0.2%.
You and I both. The possibility of this card is such - it's another useful CB card from another issuer, and one that gives out decently high credit limits as well. For people whose constraints are their CL, could be a good option if their throughput is high enough.
Volodath is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2014, 7:51 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,823
Originally Posted by Frindle
How did miles come into this? We are comparing cash back cards. If this is your default card (let's assume for the case of argument that it is), then this is a big legitimate difference. Hotels, meals, shopping, etc will eat up that AF really quickly.
I guess I have got a little bias since I use my cards to collect miles as opposed to cash most of the time. Seriously though, I had, and still have the arrival card, but at the time when I used it I always had to remember to put travel charges on it to get the maximum redemption value out of it! (Which is a big negative for me since I always wanted to put the travel spend that I had,on other cards) At one point I had to "buy" a refundable airline ticket (which I hated doing, from an ethical standpoint) just so I could get my points earnings out. Therefore, I highly appreciate that a new player in the cash back market has emerged.

Sidenote, I wish Barclays would let us redeem for non travel at full value, but give the additional 10% (or more) for those who actually redeem for travel
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2014, 6:54 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The great Midwest
Programs: None
Posts: 67
Originally Posted by rgAAFT
Sidenote, I wish Barclays would let us redeem for non travel at full value, but give the additional 10% (or more) for those who actually redeem for travel
This. This is why cap1 wins over arrival in my book. .2% is a small loss for not refunding and instead getting straight gift cards.
Volodath is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2014, 4:17 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,477
Originally Posted by Volodath
This. This is why cap1 wins over arrival in my book. .2% is a small loss for not refunding and instead getting straight gift cards.
Cap1 also lets you redeem the same travel expense repeatedly, as long as it's within 90 days. ^
MaxVO is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2014, 10:13 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,823
Originally Posted by MaxVO
Cap1 also lets you redeem the same travel expense repeatedly, as long as it's within 90 days. ^

The absence of this benefit on the Barclays card was one reason I had to "buy" another travel charge. Sure wish Barclays did indeed allow this. One of you guys should probably PM me with a nice comparison.(if you wouldn't mind) Although, it must be noted that if I do decide to go for the cap1 card, the two biggest negatives I can think of are that,
1. Cap1's lax/nonexistent position on EMV
2. I hear they have been known to pull all three credit bureau reports
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2014, 1:48 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,477
Originally Posted by rgAAFT
2. I hear they have been known to pull all three credit bureau reports
They also have more and bizzarre reasons for rejections. For example, this was seriously the reasons listed on my recent rejection letter from Cap1:
a). Too many revolving accounts on TransUnion report;
b). Too few revolving accounts on Equifax report.
MaxVO is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2014, 2:04 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,823
Originally Posted by MaxVO
They also have more and bizzarre reasons for rejections. For example, this was seriously the reasons listed on my recent rejection letter from Cap1:
a). Too many revolving accounts on TransUnion report;
b). Too few revolving accounts on Equifax report.
lol, but isn't Barclays the same way in some respects? maybe its just there way of saying you have "too many inquires"
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2014, 2:05 pm
  #45  
jmw
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,127
Originally Posted by commdiver
Stop falling for all the tourist traps. Then FTF will not matter
Agree 1000%. If you are eating at places with English language menus and credit cards, you are overpaying significantly and getting subpar food at the same time. The tourist shops are also a waste of money. I prefer to withdraw Euros or whatever and use them at places that don't take credit.
jmw is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.