Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Luxury Hotels and Travel
Reload this Page >

Luxury Hotels dropping five-star ratings to save cash

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Luxury Hotels dropping five-star ratings to save cash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2009, 11:26 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,946
Luxury Hotels dropping five-star ratings to save cash

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=a0Jx2BsWXajo

Interesting....
Shangri-La is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 11:37 am
  #2  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,541
Thanks for posting this article. Very interesting, indeed.
obscure2k is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:03 pm
  #3  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,847
I thought many Paris hotels voluntarily downgraded from 4*L to 4* some years back to save on taxes -- without downgrading their accommodation or standard of service.

Incidentally, has anyone on this forum EVER thought that a W hotel was a luxury hotel? Tend to doubt.
RichardInSF is online now  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:04 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
I read something similar, but it only pertained to Starwood, which is hardly surprising. If Aman and Four Seasons were doing it, then I would worry.

Back in the 1990s, The Oriental Bangkok reduced its rates during a recession and it took years for it to get back on top. If you reduce rates, services and downgrade your star rating, you can never get back, IMHO.
vuittonsofstyle is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:16 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
Originally Posted by Shangri-La
It'll be interesting to see how the St. Regis Princeville will measure up when it opens in a few weeks.
seriously? it was a westin, although it was a $40MM (originally at least?) renovation. kauai resorts have fared very poorly in this forum IIRC. (actually, FS hualalai is probably the only hawaii resort to not get mixed reports. IIRC only one poster has said anything negative.) re starwood, st regis NY is probably one of the few to get mixed reports here instead of poor. and then there are things like this >

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...=a0Jx2BsWXajo#
...Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc., the U.S. owner of luxury brands including St. Regis and W Hotels, will let some of its properties reduce their level of service -- and number of stars -- until the industry begins to recover, spokeswoman K.C. Kavanagh said...

“Given the current economic climate, we may allow an individual property to adjust its services to below the agreed star rating,” said Kavanagh. She declined to name any of the hotels...
inevitable spin >
http://www.hotelsmag.com/article/CA6686415.html
“Given the current challenging economic environment, we as responsible owners and operators have diligently implemented protocols to control costs, largely behind the scenes. This is particularly crucial in the luxury segment where our guests’ expectations are understandingly high and we believe there has been no discernable impact on the guest experience. Some examples of cost cutting include, consolidating vendors and leveraging the collective buying powers of Starwood’s brands...
total nonsense. even FS has reportedly done short term restaurant closures. marriott was up front about cost cutting. RC bachelor gulch closed for a month, with unpaid leave for all employees. not to mention if youre not FS with super strict contracts, owners can threaten to reflag and force concessions fairly easily id think. seems like lots of starwoods dropping lately, while hilton is picking up a TON.
noticed this thread, but didnt read it - http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/starw...roperties.html

vuittonsofstyle, FS has their great contracts, and i presume aman owners are mostly solid. but there were reports here of FS doing short term restaurant closures, as i mentioned in the quoted post. re not being able to come back after cuts, maybe these kinds of things can be good - http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...enovation.html

RichardInSF, yes there are W fans in this forum.

Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Sep 1, 2009 at 12:27 pm
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:32 pm
  #6  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM
Posts: 4,576
FS has their own problems at Aviara
francophile is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:33 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NCE - GVA - MUC
Programs: mosttraveledpeople.com
Posts: 492
In a clash with the "Hotel and Gaststaetten Verband"-authority the famous Atlantic Hotel in Hamburg have lost all their stars. The owner (one of the smartest German tycoons) apparently doesn't mind. Understandably he prefers a luxurious bottom-line compared to "winning prestige, but losing money".

Many other hotels - again understandably - have stopped paying LHW the 100k-150k US$ fee for the rather questionable honor of being a "leading hotel of the world".
TrophyCollector is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:45 pm
  #8  
Four Seasons 5+ BadgeHilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YVR
Programs: Hilton*D, Marriott*LG, Hyatt*G
Posts: 6,268
I don't find this particularly surprising but I now don't think 4/5 Stars, macarons, diamonds, etc = luxury. If the Venetian can get 5 diamonds and Wynn Tower Suites 5 stars that is not saying much for the rating system. The Venetian or any hotel that large, could not offer the service of a luxury hotel (and I will be able to confirm this in just over 2 weeks time). The Wynn Tower Suites most certainly does not offer luxury service either.

Will I notice if the annual flower budget is cut from $1 million dollars to $250k? Probably and many likely wouldn't.... and would it break my stay -- definitely not.
luxury is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 12:54 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
marketing alliance and management fees are NOT what we are talking about here.

the article was very specific regarding cutting services, in the context of that causing loss of status.

but yes, those statuses are not really valued in this forum.

luxury raises a good example of potentially effective cost savings.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...rges-role.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...6-28-09-a.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...nt-aviara.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...s-flowers.html

Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Sep 1, 2009 at 1:05 pm
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 1:04 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home
Programs: Virgin FC, Qantas, Golden Circle, Sofitel, Hyatt, Starwood, Nectar, and my Tesco Club Card
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
I thought many Paris hotels voluntarily downgraded from 4*L to 4* some years back to save on taxes -- without downgrading their accommodation or standard of service.

.
I'd heard that as well.

I recall India having some sort of 5* tax which pushed prices of things into the silly bracket
Kettering Northants QC is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 1:18 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home
Programs: Virgin FC, Qantas, Golden Circle, Sofitel, Hyatt, Starwood, Nectar, and my Tesco Club Card
Posts: 1,770
"Given the current economic climate, we may allow an individual property to adjust its services to below the agreed star rating,” said Kavanagh. She declined to name any of the hotels..."

Wonderfull I wonder if they will let the customers know before they take our money. Some of these properties will have to be very careful that they don't publicise services they have no intention of delivering - there are reasonable consumer protection laws in some of these countries.

I agree with the belief that cutting services and rates is not necessarily the way to go. If you've stayed at the hotel before you'll come away saying "it isn't as good as it used to be, we'll try somewhere else next time", if you haven't you'll come away saying "Heaven knows why that hotel used to get such good reviews".

For leisure travellers, I'm convinced the way to go is to charge the same and offer extra value so that it doesn't make sense to downgrade. I recall a few years back (in the last recession) Shangri la did a promo through a number of UK travel agents where if you stopped at more than one of their hotels during a holiday they'd upgrade you to club accommodation with privileges.

Last edited by Kettering Northants QC; Sep 1, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Kettering Northants QC is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 4:05 pm
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,946
Originally Posted by vuittonsofstyle
I read something similar, but it only pertained to Starwood, which is hardly surprising. If Aman and Four Seasons were doing it, then I would worry.

Back in the 1990s, The Oriental Bangkok reduced its rates during a recession and it took years for it to get back on top. If you reduce rates, services and downgrade your star rating, you can never get back, IMHO.
If you read the Four Seasons book, Sharpe noted that they didn't slash prices or services during its previous slumps.

A little off-topic, but The Peninsula Hotel chain actually owns their properties, correct? They don't have to deal with property owners.

The question is why stay and pay a premium at a luxury hotel if your not getting thoe full services?

Do you feel that some of the requirements is a little over-the-top?

Room-service customers who order wine by the glass should be presented the bottle as the wine is poured in the room, and bar or lounge customers must be automatically offered “at least two types of premium quality snacks,” according to the guide. If the hotel has a pool, guests arriving for a swim should be escorted to their chairs and offered refreshment.

“If you call the concierge at a five-star hotel, the phone needs to be picked up in half a second,” said Nobles. “To make that happen, you have to have a lot of staff.”
Shangri-La is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 4:14 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,946
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
noticed this thread, but didnt read it - http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/starw...roperties.html

vuittonsofstyle, FS has their great contracts, and i presume aman owners are mostly solid. but there were reports here of FS doing short term restaurant closures, as i mentioned in the quoted post. re not being able to come back after cuts, maybe these kinds of things can be good - http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...enovation.html

RichardInSF, yes there are W fans in this forum.
Sorry I missed that thread (I don't really go into the Starwood forum).
Shangri-La is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 6:37 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jakarta
Programs: Krisflyer PPS, SPG, Hyatt GoldPassport, Shangri-la Golden Circle, British Airways ExecClub
Posts: 1,245
Originally Posted by Shangri-La
“If you call the concierge at a five-star hotel, the phone needs to be picked up in half a second,” said Nobles. “To make that happen, you have to have a lot of staff.”
wow..that's strict. I have stayed at many luxury hotels before and have yet to encounter my phone being pick up by the concierge in 1/2 sec. Few seconds if one is lucky.

A true luxury hotel can actually catered and personalized their service to individual guest requirement ( esp repeating guest ) accordingly to their personality and needs.
BENLEE is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2009, 10:17 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Exec Platinum/MM, DL Gold/MM, Hilton Diamond, Accor Platinum, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 6,963
Originally Posted by Kettering Northants QC
I agree with the belief that cutting services and rates is not necessarily the way to go. If you've stayed at the hotel before you'll come away saying "it isn't as good as it used to be, we'll try somewhere else next time", if you haven't you'll come away saying "Heaven knows why that hotel used to get such good reviews".
Exactly. Repeat guests -- presumably a hotel's bread and butter -- will notice cutbacks. We noticed small cutbacks during a 2008 visit to the Peninsula, compared to 2007. We haven't been back. Once a hotel like that fails to meet expectations they lose customers, even if the cutbacks allow them to reduce the price a bit. (The chain did redeem itself to us in a visit to the Hong Kong hotel this June.)

Originally Posted by Shangri-La
A little off-topic, but The Peninsula Hotel chain actually owns their properties, correct? They don't have to deal with property owners.
Perhaps but it doesn't prevent them risking a cheapening of their brand. See above.

I worry that the highest level of service will simply become unavailable if the global economic slump drags on. Look at air travel. A truly first class experience is now difficult to find no matter what you're willing to pay.

Last edited by Stripe; Sep 1, 2009 at 10:22 pm
Stripe is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.