DEFINITELY fed up with "luxury" hotels
Oct 26, 2016, 3:27 pm
#46
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,265
To add insult to the injury: the 1 night rate as quoted was pretty low for a top Paris property. Just saying
So if Paris, I put my chances on the Lancaster... The same hotel where I was not even welcome as a LHW guest. Although I did not doublecheck if they actually have rooms with terraces, do they?
Oct 26, 2016, 6:54 pm
#47
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: my heart is on the shores of the north Italian lakes
Programs: LX Senator Lifetime, Relais&Chateaux Club5C, ex ! "Amanjunkie", ex LHW LC, hate chain hotels
Posts: 2,515
Oh you are naughty
To add insult to the injury: the 1 night rate as quoted was pretty low for a top Paris property. Just saying
So if Paris, I put my chances on the Lancaster... The same hotel where I was not even welcome as a LHW guest. Although I did not doublecheck if they actually have rooms with terraces, do they?
To add insult to the injury: the 1 night rate as quoted was pretty low for a top Paris property. Just saying
So if Paris, I put my chances on the Lancaster... The same hotel where I was not even welcome as a LHW guest. Although I did not doublecheck if they actually have rooms with terraces, do they?
This thread is not about shaming, but about raising the question what is acceptable or not and if it makes sense to pay for a "luxury" hotel to endure things you can have for less.
Interestingly many of us seem to think that "such things happen" and that it is tolerable. Good for the "luxury" hotels
.
Oct 26, 2016, 11:54 pm
#48
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,853
I really do think all possible points of view have now not only expressed but re-expressed as well. So I am closing the thread again and this time it will stay closed.
RichardInSF, moderator, luxury hotels
RichardInSF, moderator, luxury hotels