Last edit by: SPN Lifer
This is a list of the properties discussed in this thread, excluding a few merely mentioned in passing.
Luxury Hotels
Fairmont
Fairmont Heritage Place Ghirardelli Square
Four Seasons
Four Seasons at Embarcadero (ex-Loews Regency, ex-Mandarin Oriental)
Huntington Hotel
Le Meridien
Mark Hopkins
Ritz-Carlton
St. Regis
Stanford Court
Upscale Hotels
Clift (ex-Four Seasons)
Grand Hyatt
InterContinental (5th & Howard Streets)
InterContinental (Nob Hill)
Pacific-Union Club
Taj Campton Place
Westin St. Francis
Miscellaneous Recommendations
1 Hotel (ex-Hotel Vitale)
Hotel Drisco (Pacific Heights)
Hotel Triton
Hotel Zetta Viceroy
Inn at Cavallo Point (Marin Cnty.)
Inn at the Presidio
The Battery
The Zeppelin
Luxury Hotels
Fairmont
Fairmont Heritage Place Ghirardelli Square
Four Seasons
Four Seasons at Embarcadero (ex-Loews Regency, ex-Mandarin Oriental)
Huntington Hotel
Le Meridien
Mark Hopkins
Ritz-Carlton
St. Regis
Stanford Court
Upscale Hotels
Clift (ex-Four Seasons)
Grand Hyatt
InterContinental (5th & Howard Streets)
InterContinental (Nob Hill)
Pacific-Union Club
Taj Campton Place
Westin St. Francis
Miscellaneous Recommendations
1 Hotel (ex-Hotel Vitale)
Hotel Drisco (Pacific Heights)
Hotel Triton
Hotel Zetta Viceroy
Inn at Cavallo Point (Marin Cnty.)
Inn at the Presidio
The Battery
The Zeppelin
San Francisco luxury hotels
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
I cannot imagine how anyone can regard the location of the Mark Hopkins as particularly good. You will be walking up steep hills to get back there from most any SF tourist sight, or be taking a LOT of taxis. Yes you can ride the California Street cable car; the Powell cars are often going to be full. And although I haven't stayed at the Mark, I've eaten there and it certainly did not strike me that the restaurants were characteristic of a luxury hotel.
Personally I do agree with you that walking up the hill is fun the first 3 times and not so fun afterwards. If you have a car it is a little better however traffic in this area is also often a bit of a pain.
#62
#63
#64
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: DE,UN,StarwoodGold
Posts: 522
I cannot imagine how anyone can regard the location of the Mark Hopkins as particularly good. You will be walking up steep hills to get back there from most any SF tourist sight, or be taking a LOT of taxis. Yes you can ride the California Street cable car; the Powell cars are often going to be full. And although I haven't stayed at the Mark, I've eaten there and it certainly did not strike me that the restaurants were characteristic of a luxury hotel.
Last edited by time2go1st; Aug 1, 2013 at 10:25 am Reason: add reply
#66
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: DE,UN,StarwoodGold
Posts: 522
Huntington sounds like a lovely choice if you like a beautifully maintained classic property; as I recall it was good enough to be Liz Taylor's preferred choice for her stays in the city. Also, it's nice just to stroll around the top of Nob Hill, daytime or evening -- see the Cathedral right there, stop into the other hotels to check them out or have drinks, drink in views from every direction, etc. I'm sure you'll have a great time there -- let us know how it goes!
#67
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Francisco
Programs: Four Seasons Aviara (owner), Starwood, Marriott, Hyatt, Hertz President's Circle, United MP 30+ yrs
Posts: 1,252
Huntington sounds like a lovely choice if you like a beautifully maintained classic property; as I recall it was good enough to be Liz Taylor's preferred choice for her stays in the city. Also, it's nice just to stroll around the top of Nob Hill, daytime or evening -- see the Cathedral right there, stop into the other hotels to check them out or have drinks, drink in views from every direction, etc. I'm sure you'll have a great time there -- let us know how it goes!
Beautiful location and has a slightly different feeling since there are real neighborhoods where people live nearby. Not just hotels.
#69
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Recently spent two nights at the Ritz San Francisco.
I love the location / area.
Parallel 37 itself is worth a visit even if you are not staying at the hotel. Chef Michael Rotondo and Camber (well known in SF bar circles) running the bar / mixology make for a wonderful combination.
The lobby bar is OK, classic grand dame San Francisco. Fun people watching.
My original room had some issues, which I notified the front desk about. Not expecting anything, but two hours later a manager calls to ask if I would like to move to a suite. OK, yes.
Very big and nice room, but again, in the classic style. I like this style (not always, but sometimes), and I really liked the huge suite they moved us to.
They are beginning a complete(?) renovation of the rooms, and apparently after building out some test concepts have decided on their new style. I did not get to see a new room, but it sounds like a serious 'modernization' is underway.
That's ok, if you want grand dame you can always stay at the Fairmont once the Ritz finishes their renovations.
Overall a very pleasant stay. The staff is wonderful top to bottom.
I love the location / area.
Parallel 37 itself is worth a visit even if you are not staying at the hotel. Chef Michael Rotondo and Camber (well known in SF bar circles) running the bar / mixology make for a wonderful combination.
The lobby bar is OK, classic grand dame San Francisco. Fun people watching.
My original room had some issues, which I notified the front desk about. Not expecting anything, but two hours later a manager calls to ask if I would like to move to a suite. OK, yes.
Very big and nice room, but again, in the classic style. I like this style (not always, but sometimes), and I really liked the huge suite they moved us to.
They are beginning a complete(?) renovation of the rooms, and apparently after building out some test concepts have decided on their new style. I did not get to see a new room, but it sounds like a serious 'modernization' is underway.
That's ok, if you want grand dame you can always stay at the Fairmont once the Ritz finishes their renovations.
Overall a very pleasant stay. The staff is wonderful top to bottom.
#70
Recently spent two nights at the Ritz San Francisco.
I love the location / area.
Parallel 37 itself is worth a visit even if you are not staying at the hotel. Chef Michael Rotondo and Camber (well known in SF bar circles) running the bar / mixology make for a wonderful combination.
The lobby bar is OK, classic grand dame San Francisco. Fun people watching.
My original room had some issues, which I notified the front desk about. Not expecting anything, but two hours later a manager calls to ask if I would like to move to a suite. OK, yes.
Very big and nice room, but again, in the classic style. I like this style (not always, but sometimes), and I really liked the huge suite they moved us to.
They are beginning a complete(?) renovation of the rooms, and apparently after building out some test concepts have decided on their new style. I did not get to see a new room, but it sounds like a serious 'modernization' is underway.
That's ok, if you want grand dame you can always stay at the Fairmont once the Ritz finishes their renovations.
Overall a very pleasant stay. The staff is wonderful top to bottom.
I love the location / area.
Parallel 37 itself is worth a visit even if you are not staying at the hotel. Chef Michael Rotondo and Camber (well known in SF bar circles) running the bar / mixology make for a wonderful combination.
The lobby bar is OK, classic grand dame San Francisco. Fun people watching.
My original room had some issues, which I notified the front desk about. Not expecting anything, but two hours later a manager calls to ask if I would like to move to a suite. OK, yes.
Very big and nice room, but again, in the classic style. I like this style (not always, but sometimes), and I really liked the huge suite they moved us to.
They are beginning a complete(?) renovation of the rooms, and apparently after building out some test concepts have decided on their new style. I did not get to see a new room, but it sounds like a serious 'modernization' is underway.
That's ok, if you want grand dame you can always stay at the Fairmont once the Ritz finishes their renovations.
Overall a very pleasant stay. The staff is wonderful top to bottom.
#71
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 133
Recently spent two nights at the Ritz San Francisco.
I love the location / area.
Parallel 37 itself is worth a visit even if you are not staying at the hotel. Chef Michael Rotondo and Camber (well known in SF bar circles) running the bar / mixology make for a wonderful combination.
The lobby bar is OK, classic grand dame San Francisco. Fun people watching.
My original room had some issues, which I notified the front desk about. Not expecting anything, but two hours later a manager calls to ask if I would like to move to a suite. OK, yes.
Very big and nice room, but again, in the classic style. I like this style (not always, but sometimes), and I really liked the huge suite they moved us to.
They are beginning a complete(?) renovation of the rooms, and apparently after building out some test concepts have decided on their new style. I did not get to see a new room, but it sounds like a serious 'modernization' is underway.
That's ok, if you want grand dame you can always stay at the Fairmont once the Ritz finishes their renovations.
Overall a very pleasant stay. The staff is wonderful top to bottom.
I love the location / area.
Parallel 37 itself is worth a visit even if you are not staying at the hotel. Chef Michael Rotondo and Camber (well known in SF bar circles) running the bar / mixology make for a wonderful combination.
The lobby bar is OK, classic grand dame San Francisco. Fun people watching.
My original room had some issues, which I notified the front desk about. Not expecting anything, but two hours later a manager calls to ask if I would like to move to a suite. OK, yes.
Very big and nice room, but again, in the classic style. I like this style (not always, but sometimes), and I really liked the huge suite they moved us to.
They are beginning a complete(?) renovation of the rooms, and apparently after building out some test concepts have decided on their new style. I did not get to see a new room, but it sounds like a serious 'modernization' is underway.
That's ok, if you want grand dame you can always stay at the Fairmont once the Ritz finishes their renovations.
Overall a very pleasant stay. The staff is wonderful top to bottom.
To others - are there any other better 2-room suite options that I am missing? Of the hotels I see mentioned here, only the Taj has a suite at the $500-600 level (and that one is tiny with a windowless parlor, though maybe would get upgraded through FHR). The only other options I've found in SF are the Clift and the Kimpton hotels.
#72
How high up the hill is the RC? We have a suite booked for Labor Day week. Need a 2-room suite as we have a baby. A bit worried about shlepping the stroller up and down, though I get the impression that the RC is not so far up the hill (unlike the Fairmont, etc). Is that correct?
#73
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sonoma
Programs: Several here and there, but not as many during my road warrior days!
Posts: 715
How high up the hill is the RC? We have a suite booked for Labor Day week. Need a 2-room suite as we have a baby. A bit worried about shlepping the stroller up and down, though I get the impression that the RC is not so far up the hill (unlike the Fairmont, etc). Is that correct?
To others - are there any other better 2-room suite options that I am missing? Of the hotels I see mentioned here, only the Taj has a suite at the $500-600 level (and that one is tiny with a windowless parlor, though maybe would get upgraded through FHR). The only other options I've found in SF are the Clift and the Kimpton hotels.
To others - are there any other better 2-room suite options that I am missing? Of the hotels I see mentioned here, only the Taj has a suite at the $500-600 level (and that one is tiny with a windowless parlor, though maybe would get upgraded through FHR). The only other options I've found in SF are the Clift and the Kimpton hotels.
#74
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
How high up the hill is the RC? We have a suite booked for Labor Day week. Need a 2-room suite as we have a baby. A bit worried about shlepping the stroller up and down, though I get the impression that the RC is not so far up the hill (unlike the Fairmont, etc). Is that correct?
To others - are there any other better 2-room suite options that I am missing? Of the hotels I see mentioned here, only the Taj has a suite at the $500-600 level (and that one is tiny with a windowless parlor, though maybe would get upgraded through FHR). The only other options I've found in SF are the Clift and the Kimpton hotels.
To others - are there any other better 2-room suite options that I am missing? Of the hotels I see mentioned here, only the Taj has a suite at the $500-600 level (and that one is tiny with a windowless parlor, though maybe would get upgraded through FHR). The only other options I've found in SF are the Clift and the Kimpton hotels.
If you are going to be walking around San Francisco a lot, of course you are expecting to go up and down alot anyway.
Is this an option? I know they have larger multi-room suites there, but have never stayed myself: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/fairm...li-square.html
This looks like a cool little tool:
"Colors show which streets go uphill or downhill when you approach them from the stick-figure location marker"
http://hillmapper.com/#16/map/37.781...3450/-104/-273
This is not luxury related, but I found it interesting:
"Currently, only one new hotel is under construction in San Francisco, a 172-room Hampton Inn that will open in the fall at 942 Mission St. The last new hotel built in San Francisco was the Intercontinental at Fifth and Howard streets, which opened in 2008."
"Hotels currently are above 80 percent occupancy, a historical high for the city. Average room rates jumped 13.4 percent over the past 12 months to $203.18, according to STR Global, a hotel industry research group. "
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/articl...=hp-hc-bayarea
Last edited by LarkSFO; Jul 22, 2014 at 8:45 pm
#75
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Palo Alto, CA, USA
Posts: 3,221
We live on the peninsula so stay in San Francisco often for opera, symphony, theatre, art exhibitions. Because we aren't tourists (we used to live in the city), location is unimportant. With that in mind we love the rooms (and views) at the Mandarin Oriental. We also like to get a suite at the Ritz on the club level. Love the food presentations there, not so wild about their Parallel 37 restaurant. Actually, not wild about the food offerings at the MO, either.
Can't abide the minimalist ethos on offer at the Four Seasons and St. Regis. Purely a matter of personal taste.
Speaking of which, whilst it's true the Ritz badly needs refurbishment, the pricing of rooms in this luxury hotel is very attractive. Meanwhile, the Ritz lobby HAS been redone and is positively awful but that's ok since we have the club lounge in which to repose.
Can't abide the minimalist ethos on offer at the Four Seasons and St. Regis. Purely a matter of personal taste.
Speaking of which, whilst it's true the Ritz badly needs refurbishment, the pricing of rooms in this luxury hotel is very attractive. Meanwhile, the Ritz lobby HAS been redone and is positively awful but that's ok since we have the club lounge in which to repose.