Carlyle, New York City
#2
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Asheville, NC
Programs: Virtuoso, FSPP, STARS, MO FAN Club, PEN Club, Bellini Club, Dorchester Diamond Club, Travel Leaders
Posts: 1,854
The Carlyle is located on the Upper East Side - E. 76th St. at Madison Ave.
Here's a review I posted two years ago...
For 2010, Virtuoso guests receive:
Here's a review I posted two years ago...
Located at East 76th and Madison, the Carlyle is located in a residential neighborhood very convenient to such attractions as the Metropolitan Museum. This is a very attractive hotel, and the newly renovated rooms come in either an ivory or a blue color scheme; I found both very appealing. There is much variety among the rooms (and the bathrooms), and it's important to know your client's preferences when booking this hotel. Do they want a bath tub? a separate shower? a powder room in their suite? a kitchenette? Chances are, the hotel can accommodate whatever they wish if you work with the Sales staff. For a special treat, book a tower room for incredible views of the full expanse of Central Park or looking south down Madison Avenue.
It's a Virtuoso property:For 2010, Virtuoso guests receive:
- Upgrade upon arrival, subject to availability
- $80 total daily Breakfast Credit, in restaurant or via room service for up to 2 in-room guests
- Complimentary High Speed Internet access
- Welcome amenity
- $50.00 Food & Beverage credit, once during stay
#4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
The Carlyle has excellent service and, unlike most NYC hotels these days, its restaurants are self-run and are really good, with terrific atmosphere.
Everything works well at the Carlyle - the two problems are the accommodation - it really needs a complete re-think as even the large suites are oddly decorated - and The Spa, which looks more like a nightclub and is more of a hair salon than anything else.
A Central Park Tower Suite works best, but even in these, bathrooms are old and tiny, on the whole. They have started to refurbish, though, so I would ask for a recently refurbished room. Despite its quirks, The Carlyle is a lovely place to stay - very much of the place.
Everything works well at the Carlyle - the two problems are the accommodation - it really needs a complete re-think as even the large suites are oddly decorated - and The Spa, which looks more like a nightclub and is more of a hair salon than anything else.
A Central Park Tower Suite works best, but even in these, bathrooms are old and tiny, on the whole. They have started to refurbish, though, so I would ask for a recently refurbished room. Despite its quirks, The Carlyle is a lovely place to stay - very much of the place.
#5
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,854
The Carlyle has excellent service and, unlike most NYC hotels these days, its restaurants are self-run and are really good, with terrific atmosphere.
Everything works well at the Carlyle - the two problems are the accommodation - it really needs a complete re-think as even the large suites are oddly decorated - and The Spa, which looks more like a nightclub and is more of a hair salon than anything else.
A Central Park Tower Suite works best, but even in these, bathrooms are old and tiny, on the whole. They have started to refurbish, though, so I would ask for a recently refurbished room. Despite its quirks, The Carlyle is a lovely place to stay - very much of the place.
Everything works well at the Carlyle - the two problems are the accommodation - it really needs a complete re-think as even the large suites are oddly decorated - and The Spa, which looks more like a nightclub and is more of a hair salon than anything else.
A Central Park Tower Suite works best, but even in these, bathrooms are old and tiny, on the whole. They have started to refurbish, though, so I would ask for a recently refurbished room. Despite its quirks, The Carlyle is a lovely place to stay - very much of the place.
The included breakfast was OK but i thought the dining room looked very dated.
So it may be very much of the place, but whatever that place is, it's not mine.
Last edited by RichardInSF; Oct 2, 2014 at 2:00 am
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 3,317
Wow, two starkly different reviews.
Two other contenders: The Lowell & The Mark. Both UES. Anyone?
FWIW, it was the bar of the Carlyle that looked so appealing to me. Certainly not a reason to stay somewhere, though!
Instead of creating two more threads, how about turning this one into an UES thread?
Two other contenders: The Lowell & The Mark. Both UES. Anyone?
FWIW, it was the bar of the Carlyle that looked so appealing to me. Certainly not a reason to stay somewhere, though!
Instead of creating two more threads, how about turning this one into an UES thread?
#7
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
I stayed in a non-refurbished superior suite about 18 months ago and would never go back. The HVAC noisily recycled all the time and it was either too hot or too cold, the entire system needed replacing. The room itself hadn't been remodeled since the great depression. I really don't like having to find someone to operate the lift for me, not only were they not always there, I really have no problem pushing the button myself -- would rather have that person doing something else instead. The front desk wouldn't even deign o make the effort to see if I could have late checkout.
The included breakfast was OK but i thought the dining room looked very dated.
So it may be very much of the place, but whatever that place is, it's not mine.
The included breakfast was OK but i thought the dining room looked very dated.
So it may be very much of the place, but whatever that place is, it's not mine.
Food is very good, though. If they get the refurb right, then it could be OK. Until then, I will stick with MO NY and The Greenwich.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 3,317
I know what you mean - The Carlyle can be a challenge. They can't get rid of the lift operators due to the NYC Labour Laws. Between them, they earn around $1 million a year, so I heard. I, too, would like to see the back of them, especially the grumpy ones.
Food is very good, though. If they get the refurb right, then it could be OK. Until then, I will stick with MO NY and The Greenwich.
Food is very good, though. If they get the refurb right, then it could be OK. Until then, I will stick with MO NY and The Greenwich.
Greenwich is way too far.
I'll stick w/ the StR unless I can find a better UES option (or even something like the Mandarin)
#9
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
The Mandarin could work, but would require a huge walk around or a cut-through of Central Park. Could be fun...but it is December...so weather is crucial.
Greenwich is way too far.
I'll stick w/ the StR unless I can find a better UES option (or even something like the Mandarin)
Greenwich is way too far.
I'll stick w/ the StR unless I can find a better UES option (or even something like the Mandarin)
#10
During my last visit in spring of this year I looked at some rooms, but wouldn't want to stay there. Simply too out-dated and old-fashioned.
I do like the Surrey across the street. It has a bit of a boutique hotel flair, the rooms are nice, bright and a lot more modern than those at the Carlyle. The bathrooms are great. Elevators a bit slow, but that would be my only issue.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
You had me curious so I did stop over on trip advisor for a quick minute- and I think the room I have stayed in is a "seventy seven king":
http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Rev...rk.html#photos
If you want a kitchenette- keep in mind the Trump on Central Park (don't be deterred by the name)- the hotel has some nice upper floor one bedroom suites with small kitchens in them and stunning views over the park. I have also stayed here a few times and for space/view combination think this is a very good value for NYC if you need space or want to keep some food in the fridge etc and do some light cooking (I do believe they have a sign on the stovetop asking you not to do anything that creates "odors" whatever that may mean). Trump location though is far closer to the MO (in fact just across the street) so if you want to be farther up the east side than the Mark could be a better option.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 3,317
The rooms I have stayed at here did not have kitchens.
You had me curious so I did stop over on trip advisor for a quick minute- and I think the room I have stayed in is a "seventy seven king":
http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Rev...rk.html#photos
If you want a kitchenette- keep in mind the Trump on Central Park (don't be deterred by the name)- the hotel has some nice upper floor one bedroom suites with small kitchens in them and stunning views over the park. I have also stayed here a few times and for space/view combination think this is a very good value for NYC if you need space or want to keep some food in the fridge etc and do some light cooking (I do believe they have a sign on the stovetop asking you not to do anything that creates "odors" whatever that may mean). Trump location though is far closer to the MO (in fact just across the street) so if you want to be farther up the east side than the Mark could be a better option.
You had me curious so I did stop over on trip advisor for a quick minute- and I think the room I have stayed in is a "seventy seven king":
http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Rev...rk.html#photos
If you want a kitchenette- keep in mind the Trump on Central Park (don't be deterred by the name)- the hotel has some nice upper floor one bedroom suites with small kitchens in them and stunning views over the park. I have also stayed here a few times and for space/view combination think this is a very good value for NYC if you need space or want to keep some food in the fridge etc and do some light cooking (I do believe they have a sign on the stovetop asking you not to do anything that creates "odors" whatever that may mean). Trump location though is far closer to the MO (in fact just across the street) so if you want to be farther up the east side than the Mark could be a better option.
The closer I can get to 71st the better, to be honest.
If distance didn't matter, I'd keep my St. Regis rez.
Pretty much crossed off the Carlyle, so it's just Mark vs. Surrey.
#15
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
Well, The Surrey has a better restaurant - Café Boulud - a really special Boulud, with very good food and service & a really chic ambience.