Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Clear Customs In Denver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2007, 11:11 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAX
Programs: UA 1K MM; Bonvoy Titanium; most other FF programs...
Posts: 654
Clear Customs In Denver

Hi All,

I am thinking of flying through Denver back to LA from Frankfurt in January.

Given weather, etc., I am worried the itinerary I am on doesn't leave much leeway for clearing customs and making my flight back to LA.

I would be flying on LH446 (FRA-DEN) arriving @ 3:50p connecting to UA245 (DEN-LAX) departing @ 5:15p.

And is it easier to clear customs/immigration in Denver? I could fly UA 905 FRA-LAX, but I prefer LH C-Class to UA's and immigration in LA can be tiresome!

Any advice would be appreciated!

Last edited by FoxFlyer; Nov 25, 2007 at 12:06 am Reason: added times
FoxFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 12:40 am
  #2  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,373
IMHO customs in Denver is better than in LAX. But my statistical sample is rather small. But even with everything running smoothly you will have a tight connection if you have checked-in baggage. Maybe you should take a later flight to LAX like UA 1223.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 4:23 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IAH and HAM
Programs: LH Sen, PPS, FB Platinum, Enrich Silver, SPG Plat
Posts: 1,496
I would never take a connecting flight if I can go direct. Take the nonstop LH FRA-LAX or MUC-LAX. Imigrations in LAX is bad, bud not bad enough to justify to go via DEN.

Cheers, S
DFW-SEN is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 4:40 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: currently CGN
Programs: LH FTL
Posts: 140
IMO Denver Immigration is a breeze because they have only 3 int. Flights a day(FRA+MUC,LHR).
After you dropped your luggage you have to go trouh security again, which take some time and afterwards there is a long walk(and train ride) to your UA Gate.
In september I had 2:30h conneting time between a LH Flight and a UAX Flight. I needed about 2h(beeing the first one out of the plane) and had 30min left in the RCC.
LH431 is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 7:49 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: FlyingBlue Platinum, LH Senator, VA Velocity Platinum, Marriott Silver, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,010
There are several flights arriving from Mexico. Specifically, Mexicana has a daily flight from Mexico City and Cabo San Lucas and weekly from Puerto Vallarta, United has 1 flight from Cancun, and Frontier has flights from Cancun (2), Puerto Vallarta, Cozumel, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Cabo San Lucas, Guadalajara, and San Jose, Costa Rica. In addition to the numerous charter flights operating to Mexican beach destinations. So, customs and immigrations is a bit busier than just 3 European flights per day, albeit much less than LAX.
dg4255 is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 7:58 am
  #6  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,168
As a rule of thumb don't ever plan on connecting in a US airport if there is a european connection available that takes you directly into your destination. Either you waste 3 hours of your time and the connection is hit or miss. Although I'm terribly bored of the FRA-DTW flight now, I've learnt to prefer the connection in FRA, instead of flying MUC-IAD/ORD/EWR/JFK and waiting in RCCs for hours to connect to a NW/UA733/UX RJ flight that is late, especially in Winter.
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 10:57 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by DFW-SEN
I would never take a connecting flight if I can go direct. Take the nonstop LH FRA-LAX or MUC-LAX. Imigrations in LAX is bad, bud not bad enough to justify to go via DEN.

Cheers, S
Agree completely!

OP: Are you a US citizen or resident? I know immigration at LAX can be a pain, but I (a US citizen) have not experienced any difficulties, even at Bradley terminal.

In addition to avoiding the connecting flight, you would get to spend 2 +/- more hours in LH or UA C, a much better alternative than UA domestic F.

Finally, count me not impressed by Denver immigration layout, especially for connecting pax. Long, long walks, up stairs, over the bridge, down stairs, train ride; seems like a Rube Goldberg setup to me.
1kBill is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 12:06 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc, bne
Programs: UA 1K MM, VA Plat, EY Gold
Posts: 224
1h25m is a bit tight, but if it's gonna work, it's gonna work at DEN. If a nonstop to LAX is not an option, this should be fine.
jumpingenes is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 1:52 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAX
Programs: UA 1K MM; Bonvoy Titanium; most other FF programs...
Posts: 654
Thanks everyone!

I know, I know - I always try to connect in Europe, but for the Z fare I am booking, getting the LH FRA or MUC-LAX non-stop isn't avail.

So my options are flying UA FRA-LAX non-stop or LH FRA-DEN-LAX.

Of those two options, I think I prefer flying LH C as opposed to UA. They actually both get into LA at the same time, so I am basing my decision on comfort, food, IFE and general service (of which I prefer LH).

Or am I crazy?
FoxFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 4:00 pm
  #10  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,168
Originally Posted by FoxFlyer
Or am I crazy?
Not really. LH C beats UA C hands down.
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 8:04 pm
  #11  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,373
Originally Posted by FoxFlyer
Or am I crazy?
Not at all. I am also one of those "why fly direct when you could have 3 AC changes" type of person. Go for it.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Nov 25, 2007, 10:44 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
Not at all. I am also one of those "why fly direct when you could have 3 AC changes" type of person. Go for it.
I agree if this either has an effect on the comfort, the airline I am flying on, the aircraft I am flying on (I hate B747 to the US), the airport I have to go through or the ETD/ETA. Nonstops are of course my first choice but once in a while, you just need to go somewhere else first
supermasterphil is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.