Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LH/LX should demand that UA be suspended from Star Alliance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2017, 3:02 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreux CH
Programs: FB Platinum, M&M FTL, BA Blue
Posts: 11,609
I tend to share Gigantor's feelings about this, although the practicalities of chucking UA out of *Alliance, not to mention the effects it would have on LH/LX, render that improbable. I am totally up for boycotting the airline and indeed have been actively doing so since that utter mess the merger with Continental was. Having said that, it is easy to do given that I am mostly here in Europe! I have also placed a boycott on British Airways, but that is another story.

I don't like these monolithic, monopolist corporations that these huge airline companies have become, devoid of feeling and any sense of human decency. I think there is corrupt greedy culture, just like there is at the banks, at the top of all these companies that have become too big (think Smisek, and so forth) that isn't going to easily change.

It is high time the authorities take a closer look at the whole airline and travel industry, the degradation of service, the cramming of more seats in the aircraft, the call of duty in the event of irrops etc.
Concerto is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2017, 3:14 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CDG
Programs: SK Gold, AF Gold, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 3,710
Originally Posted by Concerto
It is high time the authorities take a closer look at the whole airline and travel industry, the degradation of service, the cramming of more seats in the aircraft, the call of duty in the event of irrops etc.
I completely agree with this, but it's difficult to expect authorities to step in and make drastic changes at a time when customers themselves are willing to forgo all of the above in order to save a few EUR.
gojko88 is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2017, 3:33 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Montreux CH
Programs: FB Platinum, M&M FTL, BA Blue
Posts: 11,609
Yes, I think that is the crux of the problem. We owe the LLCs a lot, especially lower fares across most the airlines, but early on I felt that there would be a sting in the tail.
Concerto is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 10:52 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 5,961
Hah, at the gate for my TP flight they announced they look for 30! Volunteers.

Waiting in the bus they actually at some point closed the doors and the police kept 6 people which obviously already passed the boarding pass check at the gate from getting on the bus. Shortly after, the GA showed up with the manifest.

so, IDBed not in the plane but almost.

i guess there was an equipment change from A321 since we now board a 320
fassy is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 3:26 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: AUH
Posts: 8,265
In airline terms, such a demand will be similar in nature to demanding that Germany or France leaves the EU.

Now go and carefully think about what kind of situations would genuinely warrant such a demand. This incident is not one of such situations.
stargold is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 3:56 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ZRH/SFO
Programs: A3*G - AZ CFP- HH DIA
Posts: 3,666
Mods: Please move this thread to the Kindergarden Thread, thanks!
Air Rarotonga is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 4:14 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: Miles & More
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by Gigantor
Based on Flight UA 3411 on Sunday, 9. April 2017

Official request made to LH/LX:
1. UA should be suspended from Star Alliance, effective immediately.
2. All codeshares with UA should be terminated, effective immediately.

This shall not be tolerated.

I will never board another UA aircraft.

This. I can't believe people actually disagree with this.

Sure there are various explanations but didnt Hitler also have his reasons? Slobodan? Come on, people where is the respect for another human being?

Some things to consider:
1. why was this particular man selected & forcibly removed? Not another?
2. forcibly removing a paying passenger in order to sit an employee for free is ok - why?
3. overbooking mishandling - all airlines overbook. When it is overbooked you do not end up ON the plane and IN a seat. This is how they avoid the situation we saw. Why is this not standard procedure at UAL?
4. Those saying he was offered $ - the man had appointments with patients & couldnt give up his seat. Couldnt the airline "reaccommodate" another pax sans the bodily harm?

Interestingly enough to discredit this man some local paper alleged he had a colourful background --which turned out to be false/mistaken identity.

Miles & More should, regardless, remove UAL from star alliance and add another airline to take it's place at least insofar as US flights are concerned.
Etwasetwas is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 4:33 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: AUH
Posts: 8,265
Originally Posted by Etwasetwas
Sure there are various explanations but didnt Hitler also have his reasons? Slobodan?
Get a grip. Seriously.
stargold is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 1:38 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PRG
Programs: LH FTL
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by Etwasetwas
2. forcibly removing a paying passenger in order to sit an employee for free is ok - why?

4. Those saying he was offered $ - the man had appointments with patients & couldnt give up his seat. Couldnt the airline "reaccommodate" another pax sans the bodily harm?
2. because deadhead crew is the most important passenger for the airline.
4. i think it speaks something about the others too... when they heard about the fuss instead of taking out their phones to film it , why no one offered their seats?

to me both parties reacted inadequately united and the passenger..
fanb is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 2:06 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
I don't think that UA will be suspended from *A, there is too much at stake for that. However, in case you don't like UA one could simply avoid them whenever you can, as I have been doing since long!
Zembla is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 11:47 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SJC
Programs: Southwest, Alaska, United, American Airlines
Posts: 994
Originally Posted by Gigantor
Based on Flight UA 3411 on Sunday, 9. April 2017

Official request made to LH/LX:
1. UA should be suspended from Star Alliance, effective immediately.
2. All codeshares with UA should be terminated, effective immediately.

This shall not be tolerated.

I will never board another UA aircraft.
United publicly supported the Lufthansa Group carriers after a mentally ill Germanwings pilot killed a planeload of pax by slamming them into a mountain, and you think LH/LX should make a fuss with UA over this?

Respectfully, gimme a break.
nerdbirdsjc is offline  
Old Apr 14, 2017, 2:09 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Programs: M&M SEN, Amex Plat, Club Carlson, Marriott, HHonors & Accor Gold, Velocity Silver, Qantas Bronze
Posts: 3,767
Originally Posted by nerdbirdsjc
United publicly supported the Lufthansa Group carriers after a mentally ill Germanwings pilot killed a planeload of pax by slamming them into a mountain, and you think LH/LX should make a fuss with UA over this?

Respectfully, gimme a break.
THIS!!!
vbroucek is offline  
Old Apr 15, 2017, 3:01 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: UA 1K; *G and *A Top 1000; HHonors Diamond; *$ Gold; Global Entry
Posts: 2,270
How about we suspend LH and LX from Star Alliance for maintaining too hot cabin temperatures on their TATL flights?

Star Alliance is just a cooperative marketing company. It's not going to "suspend" its only American member.
sannmann is offline  
Old Apr 15, 2017, 4:35 am
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 11,780
Originally Posted by nerdbirdsjc
Respectfully, gimme a break.
^

Could someone close this pointless thread, pls. If you don't want to fly UA after this incident; fine by all means put your money elsewhere when buying your next tkt, but asking LH/LX to exclude UA from *A - give me a break.
SK AAR is online now  
Old Apr 15, 2017, 9:02 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
Originally Posted by nerdbirdsjc
United publicly supported the Lufthansa Group carriers after a mentally ill Germanwings pilot killed a planeload of pax by slamming them into a mountain, and you think LH/LX should make a fuss with UA over this?

Respectfully, gimme a break.
Why wouldn't they? How does that have to do with Lufthansa?
If you mean by the fact pilots aren't carefully screened, well, that is a real issue with all airlines and probably should be addressed, but will not be. Because in society the people we place the most trust in are the least vetted. It is in the interest of all airlines to not let consumers know who actually pilot the planes. I bet not all pilots are qualified to handle emergencies like Sullenberg. But let's pretend they all are.
s0ssos is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.