FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, Brussels, LOT and Other Partners | Miles & More (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/lufthansa-austrian-swiss-brussels-lot-other-partners-miles-more-495/)
-   -   FRA-TLV going from L/H to S/H - How do you feel about it? [merged] (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/lufthansa-austrian-swiss-brussels-lot-other-partners-miles-more/1369195-fra-tlv-going-l-h-s-h-how-do-you-feel-about-merged.html)

photographer2012 Jul 12, 2012 4:42 pm

FRA-TLV going from L/H to S/H - How do you feel about it? [merged]
 
while looking at the booking system at lufthansa.com

it seems no more F on TLV-FRA

Maluku_Flyer Jul 12, 2012 5:05 pm


Originally Posted by photographer2012 (Post 18919345)
while looking at the booking system at lufthansa.com

it seems no more F on TLV-FRA

Yes, there's no F on the A32S that will be serving the route.

photographer2012 Jul 12, 2012 5:17 pm


Originally Posted by Maluku_Flyer (Post 18919471)
Yes, there's no F on the A32S that will be serving the route.

it seems as it's going to be A330 on TLV-FRA and A320 TLV-MUC

the lufthansa.com/expedia systems and the winter schedule 12-13 topic in this group show A330.

but for some reason it's also been published (at an Israeli website) they are changing all routs to A320/1

but still....not able to book F on TLV-FRA. (but for some reason it lets you book F on A320 TLV-MUC this winter:))

SFO777 Jul 12, 2012 5:30 pm


Originally Posted by photographer2012 (Post 18919345)
while looking at the booking system at lufthansa.com

it seems no more F on TLV-FRA

Ah crap.
We're booked JFK-FRA-TLV in F on 12/28-29 returning 1/6.
Still showing a 330 but F is now zero'd out.
4 hours in a 320/321 Y seat masquerading as J? I don't think so.

clubman Jul 12, 2012 11:55 pm

I think if true (and I read this on the israeli new site as well) it's a really bad move on LH's behalf.

The route has offered a L/H product for years and while I'm sure people can live with losing F on a 4 hour flight, losing the L/H business is a very different matter.

I know plenty of Senators traveling the route for connections and i can't see them sticking with LH if the route goes S/H.

oliver2002 Jul 13, 2012 2:05 am

FRA TLV will stay three class, too much business at stake, LH knows that.

To the original question, LH currently has 6 340-300 aircraft configured to be 2 class, they do fixed service to various destinations already.

The new two class 744 and 343 (with new C) are yet to be refitted into a two class config, so you won't see any appearing in the schedules till the Summer 2013 plan is published.

photographer2012 Jul 13, 2012 4:16 am


Originally Posted by oliver2002 (Post 18921611)
FRA TLV will stay three class, too much business at stake, LH knows that.

To the original question, LH currently has 6 340-300 aircraft configured to be 2 class, they do fixed service to various destinations already.

The new two class 744 and 343 (with new C) are yet to be refitted into a two class config, so you won't see any appearing in the schedules till the Summer 2013 plan is published.


do you have any idea why you cant book F in the LH website for this winter on TLV-FRA?

do all LH A330 have F class?

oliver2002 Jul 13, 2012 6:57 am


Originally Posted by photographer2012 (Post 18921844)
do all LH A330 have F class?

Yes, they do.

SFO777 Jul 13, 2012 7:13 am


Originally Posted by photographer2012 (Post 18921844)
do you have any idea why you cant book F in the LH website for this winter on TLV-FRA?

Good question. Can't book F and F is zero'd out across the board in December and January. Oliver, this smells like they are indeed going to dump F and just haven't updated the schedule to sub 320/321s.

http://sfo777.smugmug.com/Other/Luft...07-13-at-L.png

I tried booking F on LH.com and I got this...

http://sfo777.smugmug.com/Other/Luft...07-13-at-L.png

clubman Jul 13, 2012 7:58 am


Originally Posted by oliver2002 (Post 18921611)
FRA TLV will stay three class, too much business at stake, LH knows

Like I said in another thread, I think people can live without F on the 4 hour flight, but going from a L/H to a S/H product is a very different story.

oliver2002 Jul 13, 2012 8:08 am

TLV is the only destination in that area they serve with longhaul, recently CAI and previously AMM lost the widebody service. If there is revenue to be had, its in the TLV sector, surely LH knows that. I doubt the DL/CO(UA)/US direct TATL services have hit LH that badly. Who knows. If Easyjet and co kill the yield to TLV ex Europe then filling the widebody and making money on it may convince LH to deploy their aircraft some place else. We all don't know or see the figures they have.

SFO777 Jul 13, 2012 8:18 am


Originally Posted by clubman (Post 18922688)
Like I said in another thread, I think people can live without F on the 4 hour flight, but going from a L/H to a S/H product is a very different story.

+1
I can live with long-haul Business from FRA but no way would I put up with 4+ hours in a Y seat sold as C. At least LX still offers long-haul C and BA has three class F on one of its daily LHR flights.


Originally Posted by oliver2002 (Post 18922739)
If there is revenue to be had, its in the TLV sector, surely LH knows that. I doubt the DL/CO(UA)/US direct TATL services have hit LH that badly. Who knows. If Easyjet and co kill the yield to TLV ex Europe then filling the widebody and making money on it may convince LH to deploy their aircraft some place else. We all don't know or see the figures they have.

Makes sense and perhaps this is what we're now seeing.

LXA350 Jul 13, 2012 3:12 pm


Originally Posted by oliver2002 (Post 18922739)
TLV is the only destination in that area they serve with longhaul, recently CAI and previously AMM lost the widebody service. If there is revenue to be had, its in the TLV sector, surely LH knows that. I doubt the DL/CO(UA)/US direct TATL services have hit LH that badly. Who knows. If Easyjet and co kill the yield to TLV ex Europe then filling the widebody and making money on it may convince LH to deploy their aircraft some place else. We all don't know or see the figures they have.

I am asking myself if LH maybe canibalized itself by introducing MUC with a long haul plane. Why bother flying via FRA if I can fly via MUC and I am sure a big portion of european connecting traffic decided to fly via MUC instead on the day flight. What I hope they will do is to offer BER-TLV and MUC-TLV with short haul planes catering to leasure / non premium traffic with goal to operate them as profitable O & D traffic and continue to offer a premium service with a 3 class product on both daily flights via FRA anythig else would not make sense considering the high ratio of HON's and SEN's living in Israel.

SFO777 Jul 13, 2012 7:18 pm


Originally Posted by LXA350 (Post 18925241)
I am asking myself if LH maybe canibalized itself by introducing MUC with a long haul plane. Why bother flying via FRA if I can fly via MUC and I am sure a big portion of european connecting traffic decided to fly via MUC instead on the day flight. What I hope they will do is to offer BER-TLV and MUC-TLV with short haul planes catering to leasure / non premium traffic with goal to operate them as profitable O & D traffic and continue to offer a premium service with a 3 class product on both daily flights via FRA anythig else would not make sense considering the high ratio of HON's and SEN's living in Israel.

The MUC-TLV flight is indeed changing to the short-haul 321, effective October 28.

LXA350 Jul 14, 2012 4:24 am


Originally Posted by SFO777 (Post 18926324)
The MUC-TLV flight is indeed changing to the short-haul 321, effective October 28.

this is a fact, the question is the rumours about the FRA flights


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:45 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.