if the worst happens & they have to evacuate Tokyo, where are people supposed to go?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
if the worst happens & they have to evacuate Tokyo, where are people supposed to go?
If the worst happens & they have to evacuate Tokyo, where are people supposed to go?
I hope it never happens, but word from my friends in Tokyo is that they have no idea where to go in such cases. A city of 20 million citizen can't exactly all get on trains/planes/bues/cars and leave,... does the government of Tokyo (or the Japanese central government) have a plan(A, B, C, or D)?
I hope it never happens, but word from my friends in Tokyo is that they have no idea where to go in such cases. A city of 20 million citizen can't exactly all get on trains/planes/bues/cars and leave,... does the government of Tokyo (or the Japanese central government) have a plan(A, B, C, or D)?
#2
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: YYC - soon to be 東京
Programs: AC Prestige, Marriott Silver, Hyatt Gold, Hertz #1 Gold, Radisson Gold Elite, HHonors
Posts: 1,830
If the worst happens & they have to evacuate Tokyo, where are people supposed to go?
I hope it never happens, but word from my friends in Tokyo is that they have no idea where to go in such cases. A city of 20 million citizen can't exactly all get on trains/planes/bues/cars and leave,... does the government of Tokyo (or the Japanese central government) have a plan(A, B, C, or D)?
I hope it never happens, but word from my friends in Tokyo is that they have no idea where to go in such cases. A city of 20 million citizen can't exactly all get on trains/planes/bues/cars and leave,... does the government of Tokyo (or the Japanese central government) have a plan(A, B, C, or D)?
Sanosuke!
#3
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Programs: BA Gold Guest List; HH Diamond; Hyatt Diamond; SPG Gold
Posts: 2,832
I hope it never happens, but word from my friends in Tokyo is that they have no idea where to go in such cases. A city of 20 million citizen can't exactly all get on trains/planes/bues/cars and leave,... does the government of Tokyo (or the Japanese central government) have a plan(A, B, C, or D)?
For example, my nearest outdoor evacuation area from home is Shiba Park; at the office, it's Aoyama Park; or Prince Arisugawa Memorial Park if Roppongi-dori cannot be crossed (which I've always assumed to mean that the elevated section of the Shutoko has crashed down).
Your friends can probably contact their local ward office for information if they're genuinely unable to figure this out for themselves.
#4
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,786
I suppose they will just tell people to stay indoors while they wash the streets - just like it was done in Kiev following the Chernobyl disaster. Once the wind changes direction away from Tokyo, it should be possible to go outside again.
Let's hope this horrible scenario never materializes.
#5
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,934
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)
I think the question here was, if Tokyo itself has to be evacuated (ex. due to fallout) , what other area of Japan would the evacuees go to.
I can only suppose that they'd have to go west, with employees of companies having branches in oter cities moving to those cities
I think the question here was, if Tokyo itself has to be evacuated (ex. due to fallout) , what other area of Japan would the evacuees go to.
I can only suppose that they'd have to go west, with employees of companies having branches in oter cities moving to those cities
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,157
This is assumes that if the worst happened, Tokyo would need to be evacuated. But you see, even if the "worst happened" (any way you want to imagine it, short of Gojira coming over for a stomp), evacuation of Tokyo would not be something that would be needed.
#7
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 35
Is this really a possibility to begin with? What are the odds of Tokyo needing to be evacuated in the first place? It's just the media taking things out of proportion as always. Have there been any signs of dangerous levels of radioactivity anywhere near Tokyo at all?
After what I've read thus far the radiation levels are quite a bit far from being strong enough to have an direct impact on Tokyo. Not to mention all weather reports I've seen lately shows wind blowing towards the sea and away from Tokyo and not towards the city?
All this makes it highly unlikely that Tokyo will get effected by the radiation in any critical or major degree? So why would you evacuate and start a mass-panic in a city of this size, with so many inhabitants if the possibility of disaster is so unlikely? Wouldn't a mass evacuation of a city with so many people in it most likely damage the city and the people more than the radiation itself at it's current state?
If there wore to be a complete meltdown of the reactor core(s), and the radiation would leak straight out into the atmosphere and the wind brought it straight at Tokyo I guess it would be too late to evacuate the city but the Japanese government have to reconsider the possible downsides of a evacuation and compare it to the current risk of heavy radiation hitting Tokyo and currently things are pointing towards Tokyo being left okay doesn't it?
After what I've read thus far the radiation levels are quite a bit far from being strong enough to have an direct impact on Tokyo. Not to mention all weather reports I've seen lately shows wind blowing towards the sea and away from Tokyo and not towards the city?
All this makes it highly unlikely that Tokyo will get effected by the radiation in any critical or major degree? So why would you evacuate and start a mass-panic in a city of this size, with so many inhabitants if the possibility of disaster is so unlikely? Wouldn't a mass evacuation of a city with so many people in it most likely damage the city and the people more than the radiation itself at it's current state?
If there wore to be a complete meltdown of the reactor core(s), and the radiation would leak straight out into the atmosphere and the wind brought it straight at Tokyo I guess it would be too late to evacuate the city but the Japanese government have to reconsider the possible downsides of a evacuation and compare it to the current risk of heavy radiation hitting Tokyo and currently things are pointing towards Tokyo being left okay doesn't it?
#9
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moscow
Programs: DL GM and so on
Posts: 1,200
#10
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,510
#11
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 87
Ask the French - they abandoned Tokyo first.
Ask the French where to go - or rather where they went. The French Embassy was the first embassy to urge their nationals to evacuate. And so many French and French-speaking people have. I am told that the Shangri-la Hotel is virtually closed because the top management from France and Europe have left the country; the ANA Inter-Continental appears to have the same problem with its European managers just quitting their jobs and leaving. The chefs at a number of Michelin-starred French restaurants (which will go unnamed) have already left Tokyo, with some refusing to ever return. Even French cooks in smaller places we know of in Tokyo we hear have quit and left Tokyo or the country. A friend says the French president of her French-owned subsidiary in Tokyo simply left his office after the quake and later emailed the staff he was leaving and then recommended the staff evacuate.
A Japanese friend in the hospitality industyy in Japan quipped that with such stalwart profesional devotion as that, he hopes they will not come back.
A Japanese friend in the hospitality industyy in Japan quipped that with such stalwart profesional devotion as that, he hopes they will not come back.
Last edited by chamade; Mar 18, 2011 at 7:18 am Reason: edited
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 18,398
Yet their president is one of the first heads of state to announce his plans to travel there:
http://elysee.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/0...-que-possible/
http://elysee.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/0...-que-possible/
#13
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 87
Yet their president is one of the first heads of state to announce his plans to travel there:
http://elysee.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/0...-que-possible/
http://elysee.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/0...-que-possible/
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 18,398
Do you have a source for this view or is it conjecture?
I recall you making an assertion not so long ago that foreigners were already leaving Japan in droves
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/japan...pan-tough.html
These contributions seem to be of a similar quality to those you made then.
#15
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 9,631
It's a bit unfair to single out the French for this criticism - German food took a turn for the wurst far earlier.
Last edited by jib71; Mar 18, 2011 at 8:32 am