<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>FlyerTalk Forums - OMNI/PR</title>
		<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum</link>
		<description>Politics and religion are two hot button topics that have earned a special place in the land of OMNI. While passionate debate is encouraged, civility is required.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:41:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>There has been a lot of talk about churches involving themselves but this is wrong.</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019210-there-has-been-lot-talk-about-churches-involving-themselves-but-wrong.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[California launches probe into scam targeting churches (http://m.www.yahoo.com/_ylt=AvVyrXTC95p0HDYq1FyNOKGbvZx4/SIG=12g8hpipn/**http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091121/ap_on_re_us/us_defrauded_churches_probe) 
 
From either side, you just don't rip...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://m.www.yahoo.com/_ylt=AvVyrXTC95p0HDYq1FyNOKGbvZx4/SIG=12g8hpipn/**http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091121/ap_on_re_us/us_defrauded_churches_probe" target="_blank">California launches probe into scam targeting churches</a><br />
<br />
From either side, you just don't rip people off.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>the_happiness_store</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019210-there-has-been-lot-talk-about-churches-involving-themselves-but-wrong.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tea parties don't get along.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019202-tea-parties-dont-get-along.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:33:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Rivalries and feuds: Will Tea Partiers turn on each other? (http://m.www.yahoo.com/_ylt=AsqfimNXW.RteN4lUg2I1OGbvZx4/SIG=120jufdnh/**http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091120/pl_politico/29744) 
 
What a surprise. People who were led to water...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://m.www.yahoo.com/_ylt=AsqfimNXW.RteN4lUg2I1OGbvZx4/SIG=120jufdnh/**http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091120/pl_politico/29744" target="_blank">Rivalries and feuds: Will Tea Partiers turn on each other?</a><br />
<br />
What a surprise. People who were led to water believing they found water have no idea where the water is.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>the_happiness_store</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019202-tea-parties-dont-get-along.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama tells troops, "You make a pretty good photo op."]]></title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019184-obama-tells-troops-you-make-pretty-good-photo-op.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jKuUIlpbxs 
 
What a disrespectful piece of garbage. Maybe he should stick to the teleprompters next time.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jKuUIlpbxs" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jKuUIlpbxs</a><br />
<br />
What a disrespectful piece of garbage. Maybe he should stick to the teleprompters next time.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>United737522</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019184-obama-tells-troops-you-make-pretty-good-photo-op.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is it too early to put Obama on Mount Rushmore?</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019143-too-early-put-obama-mount-rushmore.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:34:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Already people agree that President Obama is something special. Not only is the the first black US President, he is a Nobel Peace Prize Winner and has decided, at long last, to give Americans healthcare as a right, not a privilege. He has a warmth,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Already people agree that President Obama is something special. Not only is the the first black US President, he is a Nobel Peace Prize Winner and has decided, at long last, to give Americans healthcare as a right, not a privilege. He has a warmth, gravitas and compassion that puts him up with the founding fathers (the irony, since they were all slavers). Is it too early to talk of putting him on Mount Rushmore? Clearly he will be there eventually, but wouldn't it be nice for him - and his lovely wife Michelle - to see it within their own lifetimes?<br />
<br />
^:-:^:-:^<br />
:-:^:-:^:-:<br />
^:-:^:-:^<br />
:-:^:-:^:-:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>Mr H</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019143-too-early-put-obama-mount-rushmore.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Media Awards: Gender Equity</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019118-media-awards-gender-equity.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:35:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have a question: why do we have separate categories for women and men for awards in such areas as acting, singing, etc?  As far as I know, there is nothing inherent in a particular gender that makes a man better than a woman or vice versa at art. ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a question: why do we have separate categories for women and men for awards in such areas as acting, singing, etc?  As far as I know, there is nothing inherent in a particular gender that makes a man better than a woman or vice versa at art.  Why do we have &quot;best actress&quot; and &quot;best actor&quot; awards?  And if we have these, why not &quot;best hispanic actor&quot; or &quot;best lesbian actress&quot; or even &quot;best christian&quot;?  By separating out gender, are we saying that one gender cannot compete against another?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>oenophilist</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019118-media-awards-gender-equity.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nutley, NJ proposes charging parents for kids habitually in detention</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019101-nutley-nj-proposes-charging-parents-kids-habitually-detention.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:57:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[If it doesn't pass, then community service.  Let's see where this goes! 
 
http://wcbstv.com/local/paying.for.detention.2.1323136.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>If it doesn't pass, then community service.  Let's see where this goes!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://wcbstv.com/local/paying.for.detention.2.1323136.html" target="_blank">http://wcbstv.com/local/paying.for.d...2.1323136.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>Analise</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019101-nutley-nj-proposes-charging-parents-kids-habitually-detention.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stalled global warming and evidence of scientific fraud?</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019014-stalled-global-warming-evidence-scientific-fraud.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The Spiegel Online reports, "Stagnating Temperatures: Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out (http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html)": 
 
---Quote--- 
Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Spiegel Online reports, &quot;<a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html" target="_blank">Stagnating Temperatures: Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out</a>&quot;:<br />
<blockquote><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.<br />
<br />
At least the weather in Copenhagen is likely to be cooperating. The Danish Meteorological Institute predicts that temperatures in December, when the city will host the United Nations Climate Change Conference, will be one degree above the long-term average.<br />
<br />
Otherwise, however, not much is happening with global warming at the moment. The Earth's average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year.<br />
<br />
Ironically, climate change appears to have stalled in the run-up to the upcoming world summit in the Danish capital, where thousands of politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, business leaders and environmental activists plan to negotiate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
<br />
[. . .]<br />
<br />
The planet's temperature curve rose sharply for almost 30 years, as global temperatures increased by an average of 0.7 degrees Celsius (1.25 degrees Fahrenheit) from the 1970s to the late 1990s. &quot;At present, however, the warming is taking a break,&quot; confirms meteorologist Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in the northern German city of Kiel. Latif, one of Germany's best-known climatologists, says that the temperature curve has reached a plateau. &quot;There can be no argument about that,&quot; he says. &quot;We have to face that fact.&quot;<br />
<br />
[. . .]<br />
<br />
Just a few weeks ago, Britain's Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research added more fuel to the fire with its latest calculations of global average temperatures. According to the Hadley figures, the world grew warmer by 0.07 degrees Celsius from 1999 to 2008 and not by the 0.2 degrees Celsius assumed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. And, say the British experts, when their figure is adjusted for two naturally occurring climate phenomena, El Niño and La Niña, the resulting temperature trend is reduced to 0.0 degrees Celsius -- in other words, a standstill.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></blockquote>Meanwhile, the Climatic Research Unit is in the news today, and not in a good way.  The <a href="http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/hadley_hacked#63657" target="_blank">Herald Sun</a> reports that hackers broke into the Center's computer system and posted some of its files on the internet.  Rather damagingly, the Center's internal e-mails seemingly suggest fraud on the part of the Center's climatologists in manipulating their data to paint a biased picture of a warming Earth:<br />
<blockquote><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Hackers have broken into the data base of the [CRU] unit - one of the world&#8217;s leading alarmist centres - and put the files they stole on the Internet, on the grounds that the science is too important to be kept under wraps.<br />
<br />
The ethics of this are dubious. But the files suggest, on a very preliminary glance, some other very dubious practices, too, and a lot of collusion - sometimes called &#8220;peer review&#8221;. Or even conspiracy.<br />
<br />
[. . .]<br />
<br />
The [CRU] director admits the emails seem to be genuine:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>The director of Britain&#8217;s leading Climate Research Unit, Phil Jones, has told Investigate magazine&#8217;s TGIF Edition tonight ...&quot;It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago that someone had hacked into our system and taken and copied loads of data files and emails.&quot;</blockquote>So the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory - a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science. I&#8217;ve been adding some of the most astonishing in updates below - emails suggesting conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></blockquote>Here's just one of many e-mails reflecting dubious practices (emphasis mine):<br />
<blockquote><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				From: Phil Jones<br />
To: ray bradley ,mann@XXXX, mhughes@XXXX<br />
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement<br />
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000<br />
Cc: <a href="mailto:k.briffa@XXX.osbo">k.briffa@XXX.osbo</a>rn@XXXX<br />
<br />
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,<br />
<br />
Once Tim&#8217;s got a diagram here we&#8217;ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;ve just completed <b>Mike&#8217;s Nature trick</b> of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith&#8217;s <b>to hide the decline</b>. Mike&#8217;s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.<br />
<br />
Thanks for the comments, Ray.<br />
<br />
Cheers<br />
Phil<br />
<br />
Prof. Phil Jones<br />
Climatic Research Unit Telephone XXXX<br />
School of Environmental Sciences Fax XXXX<br />
University of East Anglia<br />
Norwich
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></blockquote></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>SAT Lawyer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019014-stalled-global-warming-evidence-scientific-fraud.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Russia, more civilised than the US?</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019002-russia-more-civilised-than-us.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8367831.stm 
 
Russia's ban on the death penalty will remain when a current legal suspension expires on 1 January, the country's Constitutional Court has ruled. 
 
It said the use of the death penalty was now...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8367831.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8367831.stm</a><br />
<br />
<i>Russia's ban on the death penalty will remain when a current legal suspension expires on 1 January, the country's Constitutional Court has ruled.<br />
<br />
It said the use of the death penalty was now impossible because Russia had signed international deals banning it. </i><br />
<br />
If the Russians can ban the death penalty, even in the face of public opposition why can't other countries including the US?  It was popular in the UK until we banned it, yet I doubt there's many Brits who'd really want to bring it back.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>USA_flyer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1019002-russia-more-civilised-than-us.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should there be a limit on number of threads started per day in OMNI/PR?</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018998-should-there-limit-number-threads-started-per-day-omni-pr.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Contemplate that over your morning stroopwafel.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Contemplate that over your morning stroopwafel.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>RichMSN</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018998-should-there-limit-number-threads-started-per-day-omni-pr.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bill To Audit Federal Reserve Passes Key Hurdle</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018993-bill-audit-federal-reserve-passes-key-hurdle.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
In an unprecedented defeat for the Federal Reserve, an amendment to audit the multi-trillion dollar institution was approved by the House Finance Committee with an overwhelming and bipartisan 43-26 vote on Thursday afternoon despite...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				In an unprecedented defeat for the Federal Reserve, an amendment to audit the multi-trillion dollar institution was approved by the House Finance Committee with an overwhelming and bipartisan 43-26 vote on Thursday afternoon despite harried last-minute lobbying from top Fed officials and the surprise opposition of Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who had previously been a supporter.<br />
<br />
The measure, cosponsored by Reps. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), authorizes the Government Accountability Office to conduct a wide-ranging audit of the Fed's opaque deals with foreign central banks and major U.S. financial institutions. The Fed has never had a real audit in its history and little is known of what it does with the trillions of dollars at its disposal. <br />
<br />
The GOP broadly backed the amendment<br />
<br />
15 Democrats bucked Barney Frank, voting with Paul. Key to winning Democratic support was a letter posted early Thursday from labor leaders and progressive economists. The letter, organized by the liberal blog FireDogLake.com, called for a rejection of the Watt substitute and support for Paul. <br />
<br />
Grayson was able to show Democratic colleagues that the liberal base was behind them. <br />
<br />
&quot;Today was Waterloo for Fed secrecy,&quot; a victorious Grayson said afterwards.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/19/fed-beaten-bill-to-audit_n_364546.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/1..._n_364546.html</a><br />
<br />
I hope this passes.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018993-bill-audit-federal-reserve-passes-key-hurdle.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>On medical leave for depression - insurer hacks Facebook and decides she cured</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018971-medical-leave-depression-insurer-hacks-facebook-decides-she-cured.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:58:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/11/19/quebec-facebook-sick-leave-benefits.html 
 
Whoa.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/11/19/quebec-facebook-sick-leave-benefits.html" target="_blank">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/st...-benefits.html</a><br />
<br />
Whoa.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>swei0009</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018971-medical-leave-depression-insurer-hacks-facebook-decides-she-cured.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>American obession with squeezing titties of youngish women is unsustainable</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018945-american-obession-squeezing-titties-youngish-women-unsustainable.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
Again in 1977, after an official of the National Cancer Institute voiced concern that *women in their 40s were getting too much radiation from unnecessary screening*, the National Institutes of Health held a consensus conference on...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Again in 1977, after an official of the National Cancer Institute voiced concern that <b>women in their 40s were getting too much radiation from unnecessary screening</b>, the National Institutes of Health held a consensus conference on mammography, which concluded that most women should wait until they’re 50 to have regular screenings.<br />
<br />
Why do we keep coming around to the same advice — but never comfortably follow it? <br />
...<br />
By 1913, the surgeons and gynecologists who started the American Society for the Control of Cancer (later the American Cancer Society) had begun an anti-cancer campaign that, among other things, advised women to see their doctors “without delay” if they had a breast lump. Their message promoted the idea that if cancer was detected early enough, surgery could cure it.<br />
<br />
This claim, like the cancer theory it was built on, was based on intuition and wishful thinking and the desire to do something for patients, not on detailed evidence that patients were more likely to survive if their cancer was caught early and cut out. But it did create a culture of fear around breast cancer, and led the public to believe that tumors needed to be discovered at the earliest possible moment.<br />
...<br />
During the 1930s and ’40s, more and more cancer was being diagnosed. The rising numbers led to even greater pressure to define early stages of cancer and find more cases as early as possible. Meanwhile, <b>the apparent improved cancer survival rates — a result of more people receiving diagnoses, many for cancers that were not lethal — seemed to prove the effectiveness of the “do not delay” campaign, as well as radical cancer surgery.</b><br />
<br />
By the 1950s, some skeptics were pointing out that despite all the apparent progress, <b>mortality rates for breast cancer had hardly budged</b>. And they continued not to budge; from 1950 to 1990, there were about 28 breast cancer deaths per 100,000 people. <b>But calls for earlier diagnosis only increased</b>, especially after screening mammography was introduced in the 1960s. When the 1971 evidence came along that mammograms were of very limited benefit to women under 50, it ran up against the logic of the early-detection model and the entrenched cycles of fear and control.<br />
...<br />
<br />
<b>You need to screen 1,900 women in their 40s for 10 years in order to prevent one death from breast cancer, and in the process you will have generated more than 1,000 false-positive screens and all the overtreatment they entail. This doesn’t make sense. </b>We could do more research and hold more consensus conferences. I suspect it would confirm the data we already have. But history suggests it would never be enough to convince many people that we are screening too much.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/opinion/20aronowitz.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/op...aronowitz.html</a><br />
<br />
The extremely high risks and high cost (both financially and in harming lives of all the false positives) of too much unnecessary scanning too early in a fear-based, irrational system driven by the privately insured rather than by medical science are becoming unbearably high.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018945-american-obession-squeezing-titties-youngish-women-unsustainable.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>American doctors are too smart to become primary care physicians</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018942-american-doctors-too-smart-become-primary-care-physicians.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>.... but will citizens and patients remain too dumb to do something about this problem? 
 
 
---Quote--- 
Kerry wanted to become a primary care physician. 
 
Some of my classmates were incredulous. In their minds, primary care was a backup,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>.... but will citizens and patients remain too dumb to do something about this problem?<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Kerry wanted to become a primary care physician.<br />
<br />
Some of my classmates were incredulous. In their minds, primary care was a backup, something to do if one failed to get into subspecialty training. “Kerry is <b>too smart for primary care</b>,”<br />
...<br />
Unfortunately those comments would not be the last ones I would hear disparaging primary care. Even today, similar beliefs persist among medical students and trainees, though they have long since been condensed, reduced to an oft repeated acronym among those choosing specialties: <b>I’m heading for the ROAD (radiology, ophthalmology, anesthesiology and dermatology</b>).<br />
<br />
That ROAD has had <b>devastating effects on the physician work force in the United States. While 50 years ago half of all physicians were in primary care, almost three-quarters are now specialists. </b>The future implications are even more dismal. According to one study published last year in The Journal of the American Medical Association, <b>as few as 2 percent of medical students are choosing to step away from the ROAD or from other similar “high prestige” and competitive specialties in order to pursue general internal medicine</b>. The statistic has the power to bring even the best efforts at reform and universal coverage to a grinding halt. Even with other health care practitioners like nurses and physician assistants helping to care for as many patients as they can, universal health care will be doomed if there are not enough primary care doctors.<br />
...<br />
<br />
Experts in medical education have pointed to <b>three reasons for this lack of enthusiasm: debt, income and lifestyle</b>. The vast majority of medical students finish their schooling saddled with enormous educational debt — the average amount is in excess of $140,000 — and primary care remains one of the lowest-paid specialties.<br />
<br />
In addition, with fewer doctors and more patients, as well as little reimbursement for the specialty’s <b>growing administrative aspects — filling out insurance company and health maintenance organization forms, making telephone calls and writing e-mail messages to coordinate care with other caregivers — primary care physicians end up working longer hours than doctors in other fields just to make ends meet and fulfill patient care responsibilities.</b> Moreover, while pressing and acute care needs arise routinely in patients with high blood pressure, diabetes and heart disease, there are rarely calls of the same urgency among patients with, for example, a skin lesion.<br />
<br />
But even with current legislative efforts to address educational debt, payment discrepancies and lifestyle differences, many medical educators worry that the results will not be enough. Despite the fact that primary care physicians remain this nation’s frontline doctors — diagnosing new illnesses, managing chronic ones, advocating preventive care and protecting wellness — medical students may continue to turn away from the practice of primary care.<br />
...<br />
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/health/12chen.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/health/12chen.html</a><br />
<br />
Trying to put the square peg of public schools or health care into the round hole of unrealistic and false free market dogma has predictably dire results for those the market is supposed to serve in the first place -- unless you believe markets are there only for the vendors not for the consumers...</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018942-american-doctors-too-smart-become-primary-care-physicians.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A fly zooms, buzzes; Spins and is lost in the room; He does no one harm.</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018940-fly-zooms-buzzes-spins-lost-room-he-does-no-one-harm.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/world/europe/20union.html 
:D</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/world/europe/20union.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/wo...e/20union.html</a><br />
:D</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018940-fly-zooms-buzzes-spins-lost-room-he-does-no-one-harm.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Western Men Doomed? Individuals versus Context</title>
			<link>http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018915-western-men-doomed-individuals-versus-context.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:28:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
Different cultures and groups have different styles of thinking, or to be more precise, the average behavior is different from one group to another. So is it possible that Westerners, on average, have thinking styles that make them...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Different cultures and groups have different styles of thinking, or to be more precise, the average behavior is different from one group to another. So is it possible that Westerners, on average, have thinking styles that make them ill-suited for the problems of the future while Asians have styles that make them better suited?<br />
...<br />
If you show Americans a fish tank, they’ll talk about the biggest fish in the tank. If you show Asians a tank they will make, on average, 60 percent more references to the context and the features of the scene. Western parents tend to emphasize nouns and categories when teaching their kids, Korean parents tend to emphasize verbs and relationships. If you show Americans a picture of a chicken, a cow and grass, they will lump the chicken and the cow, because they are both animals. Asians are more likely to lump the cow and the grass because cows eat grass. They have a relationship.<br />
<br />
The mode of thought more common in Asia is better suited to the complex networks that make up the modern world. The contextual, associational style is simply more valid. The linear style we’ve inherited from the Greeks is less adaptive toward the modern age. I think the West may be doomed.<br />
...<br />
 in a service economy, the ability to pick up social cues is a huge advantage.<br />
<br />
Basically, I’m saying that two groups I’m a member of — Westernized men — may have been well adapted to the agricultural and industrial societies, but our thinking styles are not well adapted to the networked age of social information flows.<br />
<br />
I’m not just saying the West is doomed. I think Western men, like me, are doomed unless we change and adapt quickly!<br />
<br />
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/western-men-are-doomed/" target="_blank">http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...en-are-doomed/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr-652/">OMNI/PR</category>
			<dc:creator>Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni-pr/1018915-western-men-doomed-individuals-versus-context.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
