One Mile at a Time [OMaaT] discussions [merged]
#91
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 466
#92
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,600
Lol, no one in Hollywood reads Variety or Entertainment Weekly. And no bloggers read this forum.
Poor guy seems to need his fans to give him some ego juice.
Fact is he makes his living judging products and people by making his life a product for others to consume. A good living by his own account.
I get that he doesn't want to be judged himself. I'm sure the guy who changed into PJs in the LH cabin would feel the same way if he knew that he was being mocked on that blog.
But a blogger complaining about being judged is a lot like a Kardashian complaining about the paparazzi.
Poor guy seems to need his fans to give him some ego juice.
Fact is he makes his living judging products and people by making his life a product for others to consume. A good living by his own account.
I get that he doesn't want to be judged himself. I'm sure the guy who changed into PJs in the LH cabin would feel the same way if he knew that he was being mocked on that blog.
But a blogger complaining about being judged is a lot like a Kardashian complaining about the paparazzi.
#94
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SMF, SNA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott Platinum Elite, IHG Diamond
Posts: 175
Lol, no one in Hollywood reads Variety or Entertainment Weekly. And no bloggers read this forum.
Poor guy seems to need his fans to give him some ego juice.
Fact is he makes his living judging products and people by making his life a product for others to consume. A good living by his own account.
I get that he doesn't want to be judged himself. I'm sure the guy who changed into PJs in the LH cabin would feel the same way if he knew that he was being mocked on that blog.
But a blogger complaining about being judged is a lot like a Kardashian complaining about the paparazzi.
Poor guy seems to need his fans to give him some ego juice.
Fact is he makes his living judging products and people by making his life a product for others to consume. A good living by his own account.
I get that he doesn't want to be judged himself. I'm sure the guy who changed into PJs in the LH cabin would feel the same way if he knew that he was being mocked on that blog.
But a blogger complaining about being judged is a lot like a Kardashian complaining about the paparazzi.
I don't think he understands how entitled he sounds sometimes. Similar to Kardashian-like values, Ben's travel world mostly consists of the best international F flight, a bubbly glass of Krug (or 3), the best F lounge or even better, F terminal, Silvercar rentals, hotel suites, and now, apparently, rubbing shoulders with Richard Quest and His Excellency from Qatar airlines.
The blog has gone from good points and miles advice to, "Hello from the F terminal! Look at my Givenchy pj's and Emirates shower" lifestyle-type posts. That is totally fine, it's his blog. Just don't try to convince us that you're culturally "taking one for the team" and suffering through these travels for the sake of the readers, LOL.
Last edited by LR2013; Jan 16, 2015 at 6:56 pm
#95
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 466
After taking a closer look at some of his more recent posts, I feel Lucky shedded the whole "fly first for less" theme a while ago. To add to his defense, I'll remind critics that Ben never started as a frugal fly for free blogger to begin with.
His tone has changed. And since he's a travel blogger writing posts for a living, I'd argue that the "product" has changed as well. I've stated else where that I'm not the biggest fan of this product, but I don't understand the anger or "hate" leveled against him either.
Edit
I also don't think highly of his flippant attitude (or at best, his ignorance) in attaching a photo with a family who in all likelihood earns far less than US$5,000 per annum to further his happiness argument. I don't know those photographed at all or where they live, but a basic understanding of developing world economics and a quick rudimentary analysis of what's pictured tells me they do not earn $5,000 a year.
But I agree with the argument's conclusion.
Edit edit
And an annual income of $5,000 is hardly considered poverty in many "third world" countries.
Edit edit edit
And I'd bet that the people who do live in bona fide poverty would NOT be happy.
Okay, I promise I'm done nitpicking.
His tone has changed. And since he's a travel blogger writing posts for a living, I'd argue that the "product" has changed as well. I've stated else where that I'm not the biggest fan of this product, but I don't understand the anger or "hate" leveled against him either.
Edit
I also don't think highly of his flippant attitude (or at best, his ignorance) in attaching a photo with a family who in all likelihood earns far less than US$5,000 per annum to further his happiness argument. I don't know those photographed at all or where they live, but a basic understanding of developing world economics and a quick rudimentary analysis of what's pictured tells me they do not earn $5,000 a year.
But I agree with the argument's conclusion.
Edit edit
And an annual income of $5,000 is hardly considered poverty in many "third world" countries.
Edit edit edit
And I'd bet that the people who do live in bona fide poverty would NOT be happy.
Okay, I promise I'm done nitpicking.
Last edited by SansSerif; Jan 16, 2015 at 10:17 pm
#96
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,678
Having read the post a few times, I never found where he actually supported his post title that the "haters" were "hypocrites". He discusses how they are wrong, shortsighted, or what have you but I'm not clear why the naysayers are hypocrites.
He says
Of course he's correct, he is judging those that are (supposedly) judging him or his blog content. But we all are guilty of judging others, at one time or another, it's human nature. As koko noted above, he makes a living judging products, services, and to an extent the people providing said services. Not to mention, as the comments to this post pointed out, OMAAT has certainly been judgmental (recent Delta post; a recent lounge drama post, etc)
The criticism of OMAAT that I've seen is in two categories - those who get personal and those that simply dislike the style, content, or subject matter of the blog posts (or point out errors). The former are not worth Ben's time even responding to.
However a blogger might want to at least objectively consider constructive criticism of his writing product. Perhaps he would attract or retain more readers by considering some feedback, who knows.
I have no opinion of Ben the person as I don't know him, nor do I need to know him - or any blogger/writer in order to read their writing products and form an opinion of those products. I used to read OMAAAT more regularly for my own information but have found its utility for me personally is no longer there as its tone and excessive fluff/drama content is off putting for me. Clearly he has quite a following so others feel differently - which is fine if that's what works for OMAAT and its followers.
He says
And maybe I’m being a hypocrite here as well. You could argue that I’m judging those that are judging. And maybe that’s wrong
The criticism of OMAAT that I've seen is in two categories - those who get personal and those that simply dislike the style, content, or subject matter of the blog posts (or point out errors). The former are not worth Ben's time even responding to.
However a blogger might want to at least objectively consider constructive criticism of his writing product. Perhaps he would attract or retain more readers by considering some feedback, who knows.
I have no opinion of Ben the person as I don't know him, nor do I need to know him - or any blogger/writer in order to read their writing products and form an opinion of those products. I used to read OMAAAT more regularly for my own information but have found its utility for me personally is no longer there as its tone and excessive fluff/drama content is off putting for me. Clearly he has quite a following so others feel differently - which is fine if that's what works for OMAAT and its followers.
#97
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 466
Having read the post a few times, I never found where he actually supported his post title that the "haters" were "hypocrites". He discusses how they are wrong, shortsighted, or what have you but I'm not clear why the naysayers are hypocrites.
#98
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,600
I also don't think highly of his flippant attitude (or at best, his ignorance) in attaching a photo with a family who in all likelihood earns far less than US$5,000 per annum to further his happiness argument. I don't know those photographed at all or where they live, but a basic understanding of developing world economics and a quick rudimentary analysis of what's pictured tells me they do not earn $5,000 a year.
And an annual income of $5,000 is hardly considered poverty in many "third world" countries.
.
People in poverty can be happy. But no one chooses to live in squalor.
But when I was his age I had the same naive perspective on the world.
Ben, (since I know you are reading this), you should seriously consider some volunteer-vacation types of opportunities. You can get a real perspective the topic of global poverty and do some good. And just think how cool it would make you to write about flying to Peru or the PI in F then spend two weeks helping dig an irrigation system or build a hut.
#99
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,386
Maybe not. I think Ben would have lots of applicable skills that would be useful in a volunteer setting- running one's own business speaks to some of them. But these are some of the things you want to avoid.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...lidays-madonna
http://pippabiddle.com/2014/02/18/th...irls-and-boys/
I'm skeptical that it's a great idea to import wealthy tourists to do manual labor that requires some skill and training (especially if they are likely to be bad at it, as the links detail).
There are likely some ways to do tourism in undeveloped countries that aren't questionable, but one has to be careful.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...lidays-madonna
http://pippabiddle.com/2014/02/18/th...irls-and-boys/
I'm skeptical that it's a great idea to import wealthy tourists to do manual labor that requires some skill and training (especially if they are likely to be bad at it, as the links detail).
There are likely some ways to do tourism in undeveloped countries that aren't questionable, but one has to be careful.
Last edited by eponymous_coward; Jan 18, 2015 at 8:59 am
#100
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 15,656
At the risk of going further OT, I agree completely. I've seen well-meaning but naive "volunteers" cause havoc and ruin communities with their activities.
True story. There was an orphanage down the street from where I used to live in Ghana. They used to have a full-time staff member whose role was to manage incoming donations of clothes, etc... She would sort, clean, mend, assign and follow-up with thank you notes. Then along came a church group from the USA who decided to "adopt" the orphanage. They showered it with gifts, volunteers, etc.. Wonderful? No. With all these extra bodies on hand, the orphanage management decided that they could do without the staff member managing the donations and let a volunteer handle that instead. So they laid off the local lady and replaced her with a teenaged American volunteer. The lady eventually had to resort to prostitution to make ends meet. Did this really help the local community? I'm not entirely convinced.
Additionally, the security needs for the volunteers often wind up alienating the local population. The volunteers have "security liaisons" (basically ex-military types who couldn't get hired on with reputable PSD firms) whose role is to ensure that they interact as little as possible with "unapproved" locals under the guise of security. When they go to the supermarket, the security folks push local people out of line so that the volunteers do not have to wait in line ("due to security concerns"). This is more of an issue with Americans than Europeans to be fair - European volunteers tend to be as oblivious about security risks as Americans are paranoid.
I'm not against these groups that usually do intend to help, but I do sometimes question what real benefits they do bring.
#101
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,600
There are some groups that run great programs. Am wine tasting today in Napa or would provide a link to one i have done.
Volunteers do manual labor and live in the community they are working for. It's a win win proposition.
Volunteers do manual labor and live in the community they are working for. It's a win win proposition.
#102
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 3,317
OMAAT complaint of the day: am I the only one whose sick of Ben using his parents are mouthpieces for the same trips he's taking 2 dozen times prior? I don't need ANOTHER EK F trip whereby I hear some variation of the following (direct quote taken from his moms TR): After a few more glasses of Dom and some caviar I took a shower at 38,000 feet
#103
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 677
OMAAT complaint of the day: am I the only one whose sick of Ben using his parents are mouthpieces for the same trips he's taking 2 dozen times prior? I don't need ANOTHER EK F trip whereby I hear some variation of the following (direct quote taken from his moms TR): After a few more glasses of Dom and some caviar I took a shower at 38,000 feet
#104
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere above the Mason-Dixon
Programs: DL Ham Samich
Posts: 1,659
OMAAT complaint of the day: am I the only one whose sick of Ben using his parents are mouthpieces for the same trips he's taking 2 dozen times prior? I don't need ANOTHER EK F trip whereby I hear some variation of the following (direct quote taken from his moms TR): After a few more glasses of Dom and some caviar I took a shower at 38,000 feet
#105
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
OMAAT complaint of the day: am I the only one whose sick of Ben using his parents are mouthpieces for the same trips he's taking 2 dozen times prior? I don't need ANOTHER EK F trip whereby I hear some variation of the following (direct quote taken from his moms TR): After a few more glasses of Dom and some caviar I took a shower at 38,000 feet