Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Emirates vs Lufthansa J

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2015, 9:07 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 184
Emirates vs Lufthansa J

On Sunday I flew Lufthansa for the first time from HKG to MUC. Booked in PE but upgraded to J at the gate. I can understand why Y and Y+ were full and J was not even half full. Lufthansa J product is terrible!

Hard Product: According to the leaflet it was the "new business class". Tight seats and they were all angled somehow, so you had to move the monitor infront of you see something. It was alright for a 12 hour flight and I could sleep, but there is not much space and they don't offer you mattresses. The IFE .. well nothing remotely comparable to ICE

Soft Product: The soft product was terrible! I would never pay for it. The FA didn't greet anyone, they never spoke to you by name as they do on EK all the time. The meal service is done just like in Y with trolleys. They come in with all meals and drinks, nothing has been prepared in the galley. They have all choices right there and mix it in front of you. The food was the worst I ever had - most pax didn't finish from what I could see.

People can complain about EK what they want - fact is their lounges are far superior to any *A lounge (except the CIP in IST) and they J hard and soft products are just amazing compared to LH.

However: Skywards mileage earning is not that good anymore and pricing is high. If I book PE from HKG with LH and get upgraded to J I'd still take that over the same flight to DXB-MUC in Y. Just make sure you eat something before. My return is on 28th.. lets see if it wil be in PE or J

Anyways: Just my quick comparison between LH and EK. I still love EK I guess

Last edited by TaipeiWang; Aug 18, 2015 at 9:13 am
TaipeiWang is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2015, 9:11 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,694
what does "HP" and "SP" stand for?
irishguy28 is online now  
Old Aug 18, 2015, 9:13 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by irishguy28
what does "HP" and "SP" stand for?
changed it
TaipeiWang is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2015, 12:25 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Near the Beach.
Posts: 202
Originally Posted by TaipeiWang


People can complain about EK what they want - ....they J hard and soft products are just amazing compared to LH.
^
LifeontheBeach is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2015, 2:25 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: EK - Silver; Accor - Silver; O6 - Gold; BAEC - Silver; Flying Blue; SPG; Krisflyer
Posts: 506
No one ever accused LH of excellent J product.

But to be fair the *A lounge under ANA, at NRT is excellent IMHO.
lighthand is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2015, 9:26 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: BOM
Programs: EK Plat, HHonors Gold
Posts: 2,882
Good to know. Haven't flown LH in a long while (5+ years) but the last time I was in one of their 747s FRA-BOM, the whole a/c creaked during takeoff and landing. Was glad that it was probably the last time I was getting on LH.
jackiedada is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2015, 2:45 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Melbourne
Programs: EK, QF, VA
Posts: 73
I enjoy EKs service, which is why I stick with them the majority of the time, but their J fares could never be classified as cheap any more. However, with a little hunting around you can usually find a good cheaper alternative for J out of MEL in my case.

As an example, if I want to travel J to the UK in the off-season, it'll cost me around 6.5K return on EK, whereas I can do it very nicely on Royal Brunei for 4.9K.
evilbrian is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2015, 3:44 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,053
The angled seats are outright weird indeed....the aisle seat is slightly shifted back, so the aisle PAX's face is always in that weird uncomfortable space where you "feel" someone is watching you from behind.
gpia is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2015, 3:46 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,454
Originally Posted by guidospizza
The angled seats are outright weird indeed....the aisle seat is slightly shifted back, so the aisle PAX's face is always in that weird uncomfortable space where you "feel" someone is watching you from behind.
Better than someone staring you in the face like BA J haha!
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2015, 5:48 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,941
I do not think the comparison results in such a clear win for EK.

Hard product wise, I do not see such a big difference between LH new biz and EK's biz on the A380. Both seats are tight, with the additional disadvantage on LH side that your knees/feet may touch your neighbor. Comparing LH's horizontal new seat vs. EK's B777 "sliders", I would go for LH anytime. EK's ICE is industry-leading, no doubt.

EK food is better than LH food, agree. However, I prefer the LH food trolley service over EK's personalized "prepared in kitchen" service: EK is far too slow in serving its food, on recent flights it took them 2.5-3 hours after takeoff to serve my main course - very slow.

Overall atmosphere could not be more different. While the EK cabin looks, well, "golden", LH follows its traditional cool "no thrills" design. Both works for me.

Both LH's and EK's frequent flyer programs have seen better days. Miles are increasingly useless, though ratios and availability much better on LH. Elite recognition works better on EK; what I particularly like better with EK is that complimentary upgrades are processed by status, while LH now processes them by fare class. Means 60% longhaul complimentary upgrades for me on EK this year, 0% on LH.

For me, overall EK wins, but only by a small margin.
CalFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2015, 1:41 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Poland
Programs: Emirates Skywards, IHG Rewards Club
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by CalFlyer
Comparing LH's horizontal new seat vs. EK's B777 "sliders", I would go for LH anytime.
Never had problem with "sliders" on B777, including my longest flights in J DXB-GIG/EZE-DXB. For me it's flat and horizontal enough.

Originally Posted by CalFlyer
EK food is better than LH food, agree. However, I prefer the LH food trolley service over EK's personalized "prepared in kitchen" service: EK is far too slow in serving its food, on recent flights it took them 2.5-3 hours after takeoff to serve my main course
I'm not sure about timings, and never complained about it, including overnight flights.
Also, I always have food (and drinks) in lounge before flight, so it may be better for me to not have next meal so early.


Originally Posted by CalFlyer
Both LH's and EK's frequent flyer programs have seen better days. Miles are increasingly useless, though ratios and availability much better on LH.
True (but not always, when comparing money paid with miles earned EK is not that bad - usually I have Y flex ticket for the price LH is offering Economy Savers). May depend on routes also.
Anyway, now I would prefer to earn e.g. IHG points instead of Skywards miles.

worth to add, I can't compare to other airline as I never was flying J cabin in other airline then EK...
Krzystos is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.