Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > EL AL | Matmid
Reload this Page >

She Was Asked to Switch Seats. Now She's Charging El Al With Sexism

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

She Was Asked to Switch Seats. Now She's Charging El Al With Sexism

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2016, 7:38 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,042
Originally Posted by joshwex90
This is major generalization of ultra Orthodox, not to mention that it's a stretch to say they expect women to be removed.

Much closer to accuracy, they don't want to sit next to a woman, even if it moves they move or get booted to Y.

I've even seen one get off a plane. Fine, his choice.
That is how it should be, the man recognizing it is his own responsibility to move. But it is true in the religions and cultures that separate men and women, the woman's position is secondary to the man. In fact, it hasn't been so long ago that Christian marriage ceremonies still said "love, honor and OBEY."
Tizzette is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2016, 7:43 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Programs: EL AL Matmid, BA Executive Club GfL, GGL/CCR, Hilton Diamond, Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,085
Originally Posted by Tizzette
That is how it should be, the man recognizing it is his own responsibility to move. But it is true in the religions and cultures that separate men and women, the woman's position is secondary to the man. In fact, it hasn't been so long ago that Christian marriage ceremonies still said "love, honor and OBEY."
We are discussing Orthodox JEWS here, not Christians.
Orthodox Judaism prefers the sexes to be separate. However, women are not regarded as being secondary to men, nor does the Jewish wedding ceremony oblige the woman to commit herself to obey her husband.
mikebg is online now  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 3:14 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Israel/United States
Posts: 1,234
As an Orthodox women ( by no means Ultra Orthodox) I am finding that many of these comments are not only untrue, but inappropriate.

As a women I do not view myself as a second class citizen. My role in life is different, but not any less important than that of a man. ( and I am NOT referring to child bearing) The reasons for certain male obligations and female exclusions from same are beyond the scope of this forum. What is bothering me is that people are comfortable making broad overall statements about the ultra Orthodox that they would never dream of making about any other group!
awayIgo is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 5:55 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,042
I apologize to those I offended. Putting myself in the position of sitting on a plane and being asked to move because a religious man didn't want to sit by me because I am a woman, I would be both offended and hurt. The thought of it has made me kind of huffy in my comments. It is hard for me to understand how this religious belief does not put women in a second class position and I am sincere in asking for more information how this can be so. I learn a lot on Flyertalk.
Tizzette is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2016, 8:36 am
  #50  
Moderator, El Al and Marriott Bonvoy, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SIN
Programs: SQ*G, Mar LTT, Hyatt Glb, AA LTG, LY, HH, IC, BA, DL, UA SLV
Posts: 12,018
Moderator Note

Folks,
Let's get back to the topic of this specific incident and case. If you have comments about these specific individuals in the article, that is fine. Generalizations and characterization so beyond that are more the domain of OMNI P/R.

Thanks for the understanding and cooperation,
yosithezet
Moderator, EL AL Forum
yosithezet is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2016, 11:32 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York,NY USA
Posts: 1,481
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
She should have patted the poor fellow on the hand before leaving her seat and wished him well.

Could not agree more about patting his hand but forget about changing the seat. He can / should leave the plane if he is unhappy.
speedbird001 is offline  
Old Jun 21, 2017, 5:49 pm
  #52  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
She prevailed.
Israeli Woman Who Sued El Al for Sexism Wins Landmark Ruling

Excerpt:
But the court found that asking people to move because of their gender violated Israel’s anti-discrimination codes.

In discussions outside the courtroom, the two sides in the case agreed on a judgment proposed by the judge, declaring that it is forbidden for a crew member to ask a passenger to change seats at the request of another passenger based on gender. El Al agreed to tell its cabin staff in writing about the prohibition within 45 days, and to provide training in how to deal with such situations within six months.

Ms. Rabinowitz was awarded 6,500 shekels, or about $1,800, in compensation. Her lawyer originally asked for 50,000 shekels.
TWA884 is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 2:41 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TLV
Programs: UA Platinum, Avis Chairman, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, GA Pilot
Posts: 3,225
Good for her! Wondering if she got her legal fees reimbursed as well. Will be interesting if all the ultra orthodox start flying foreign carriers now instead since they won't be able to play these games on LY.
NYTA is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 3:15 am
  #54  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
Originally Posted by NYTA
Good for her! Wondering if she got her legal fees reimbursed as well. Will be interesting if all the ultra orthodox start flying foreign carriers now instead since they won't be able to play these games on LY.
I doubt that they will be able to play these games on most foreign carriers.

That said, I still think that LY should offer anyone the following choices (assuming space is available at time of booking):

1. The right to buy two tickets, with one being the middle seat in Y, and be guaranteed that the seating arrangements will be kept. (In Biz Class or FC, simply having two adjacent seats.)

2. If three people are traveling together in Y, they can buy their tickets jointly and be seated together.

It is always better for a business to make reasonable accommodations for its customers than to force them into uncomfortable situations.
Dovster is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 3:19 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Programs: EL AL Matmid, BA Executive Club GfL, GGL/CCR, Hilton Diamond, Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,085
Originally Posted by Dovster
I doubt that they will be able to play these games on most foreign carriers.
There was a very nasty incident on an Easyjet flight not long ago when some of these weirdos had to be offloaded.
mikebg is online now  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 3:47 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CPT,AMS
Posts: 4,412
Originally Posted by Dovster
2. If three people are traveling together in Y, they can buy their tickets jointly and be seated together.
But that's already possible, all they have to do is pay the seat selection fee, assuming of course at the time of booking there are still 3 seats available together, why should this be given free for the ultra-orthodox?
Ditto is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 3:58 am
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Other airlines allow you to buy an extra seat. Make it clear from the booking about this option, though I still don't believe it will solve everything. What if it's 3 seats and a woman has the other seat in the row, they'll still complain.
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 6:07 am
  #58  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
Originally Posted by Ditto
But that's already possible, all they have to do is pay the seat selection fee, assuming of course at the time of booking there are still 3 seats available together, why should this be given free for the ultra-orthodox?

Nowhere did I say it should be given to them for free. They should pay the normal prices however it should be exempt from the usual stipulation that the airline has the right to change your seat for whatever reason it wants.
Dovster is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 6:10 am
  #59  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
Originally Posted by joshwex90
Other airlines allow you to buy an extra seat. Make it clear from the booking about this option, though I still don't believe it will solve everything. What if it's 3 seats and a woman has the other seat in the row, they'll still complain.
I know of no religious requirement for a man not to seated in the same row as a woman. The most Orthodox man can sit in a window seat, have an empty middle seat, and a woman sitting in the exit row. In fact, most women (and most men) are happy to learn that there is an empty seat next to them.
Dovster is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2017, 6:21 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CPT,AMS
Posts: 4,412
Originally Posted by Dovster
Nowhere did I say it should be given to them for free. They should pay the normal prices however it should be exempt from the usual stipulation that the airline has the right to change your seat for whatever reason it wants.
And why would they be exempt and any other group of passengers (including families with kids...) wouldn't?
If I book a flight with 2 of my friends, I wouldn't want to be seated apart either.

Are LY that bad when it comes to actually keep the same seat from booking? (obviously I'm ignoring aircraft changes)
Ditto is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.