El Al or Lufthansa to TLV?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: JMB Diamond, Hilton Silver, UAL
Posts: 251
El Al or Lufthansa to TLV?
Hi there,
I am planning for my first trip ever to Israel in a couple of months. I live in the middle of the country so can fly from either New York or LA, and I don't have a big preference either way.
I am trying to consider whether the better flying experience would be on El Al or Lufthansa for this trip? In either case, I am planning on flying Business. I have flown Lufthansa many times, so they are a known for me. But I have never flown El Al. I am sort of interested in doing so for the experience of flying with them, but wanted to know what others' thoughts were here?
Thanks!
I am planning for my first trip ever to Israel in a couple of months. I live in the middle of the country so can fly from either New York or LA, and I don't have a big preference either way.
I am trying to consider whether the better flying experience would be on El Al or Lufthansa for this trip? In either case, I am planning on flying Business. I have flown Lufthansa many times, so they are a known for me. But I have never flown El Al. I am sort of interested in doing so for the experience of flying with them, but wanted to know what others' thoughts were here?
Thanks!
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
There's a couple of things to factor. Based on the dates you want to travel, which has more convenient dates/time? Which has a better price?
Assuming everything is equal, and it's purely a question of which airline offers a better soft/hard product...
I notice from your handle that you belong UA MP. Flying LH allow you to earn EQMs and RDMs for Mileage Plus, which EL AL doesn't.
If you'd rather have a single long flight as opposed to a couple of longish flights, then EL AL is better. If you don't want that really long flight, and would rather break it up, go for LH. Obviously, those are personal preferences.
Regarding the seat, the 2 LY C seats (the 772 and 744) are the same. But with LH, there are a bunch of C configs and seats. Flying LH means the first leg is on a 744. Not as good of a seat as the LY ones (IMO). But the A340 seats are decent for the second leg. None of them go fully flat, so a somewhat uncomfortable sleep. You need F on either of them for that. However, the IFE is much better on LH than on LY.
I prefer service on LY to LH.
If you're a Kosher eater, meal service will be much better on LY. If not, I've heard good things about LH, but no idea how it compares to LY (or anything for that matter).
Hope this helps!
Assuming everything is equal, and it's purely a question of which airline offers a better soft/hard product...
I notice from your handle that you belong UA MP. Flying LH allow you to earn EQMs and RDMs for Mileage Plus, which EL AL doesn't.
If you'd rather have a single long flight as opposed to a couple of longish flights, then EL AL is better. If you don't want that really long flight, and would rather break it up, go for LH. Obviously, those are personal preferences.
Regarding the seat, the 2 LY C seats (the 772 and 744) are the same. But with LH, there are a bunch of C configs and seats. Flying LH means the first leg is on a 744. Not as good of a seat as the LY ones (IMO). But the A340 seats are decent for the second leg. None of them go fully flat, so a somewhat uncomfortable sleep. You need F on either of them for that. However, the IFE is much better on LH than on LY.
I prefer service on LY to LH.
If you're a Kosher eater, meal service will be much better on LY. If not, I've heard good things about LH, but no idea how it compares to LY (or anything for that matter).
Hope this helps!
Last edited by joshwex90; Jun 20, 2011 at 4:34 pm Reason: tried to make it less confusing
#3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYS
Programs: Days of Our Lives, General Hospital
Posts: 1,495
Is there a reason to consider only those two airlines? For example, you might also look into United/Continental via EWR, United/Air Canada via YYZ, which are one-stop routes that could credit all mileage to UA.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
I prefer the onboard service on LY to LH.
LH's business seat sucks. And, LH's times flying into/out of TLV also suck for connections from the west coast.
I'm not sure why its just LY or LH from the US, CO and AC both offer vastly superior seating in business to LY or LH and they have great flight times out of EWR/YYZ.
LH's business seat sucks. And, LH's times flying into/out of TLV also suck for connections from the west coast.
I'm not sure why its just LY or LH from the US, CO and AC both offer vastly superior seating in business to LY or LH and they have great flight times out of EWR/YYZ.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,804
#6
Join Date: Nov 2009
Programs: LY-PL, A3-*G
Posts: 1,679
Regarding the seat, there are 2 LY C seats to look at and a few with LH. Flying LH means the first leg is on a 744. Not as good of a seat as the LY ones (IMO). But the A340 seats are decent for the second leg. None of them go fully flat, so a somewhat uncomfortable sleep.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Which is why I didn't say one is better than the other.
OP, if you are (as I assumed, though I could be wrong) interested in earning UA miles, you can fly CO via EWR, AC via YYZ, or US via PHL (probably #1 actually).
OP, if you are (as I assumed, though I could be wrong) interested in earning UA miles, you can fly CO via EWR, AC via YYZ, or US via PHL (probably #1 actually).
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DEN
Programs: JMB Diamond, Hilton Silver, UAL
Posts: 251
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
The better comparison, I guess, is I'd sooner fly BF on CO to Germany from EWR than fly LH.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: TLV/LHR
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Elite Amb, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 12,948
While I agree LH's C hard product isn't great ( though I find it perfectly ok for a day flight) I fail to see how LY's seat is better.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: TLV/LHR
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Elite Amb, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 12,948
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: TLV/LHR
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Elite Amb, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 12,948
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: TLV/LHR
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Elite Amb, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 12,948
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
I agree that there's "something nice" about it. But not "nice enough" to warrant one airline over the other. Only if everything else were equal, which it's not.