Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airline Programs > Delta SkyMiles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 28, 09, 9:15 pm   #16
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Programs: Delta DM/1.967 MM, Hertz Five Star, SW Rapid Rewards, Marriott Rewards, AMTRAK Guest Rewards
Posts: 733
Delta BE Is Perfectly Fine

Quote:
Originally Posted by brenig View Post
Choose KLM WBC !!! Delta BE sucks. Have had only bad experiences on Delta and only good experience on KLM.
I've had two outstanding roundtrips in BE this year, to LHR and back to PSA and back. The planes were clean, my seat worked, AVOD worked, the power port worked, the food tasted good, there was plenty of bracing booze, the service was personable and the flights were on time. What more could you want?
ND76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 09, 9:46 pm   #17
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 251
I'd probably go for KLM

Think that DL BE is usually ok but DL has (as many other American Carriers) the policy of asking you 2 sets of stupid security questions (frist at the checkin, then at the gate).

I would avoid these questions by simply switching to KLM. Not because I think it is hard to answer for the 100th time that I packed my bag by myself but simply because usually there is the one stupid tourist ahead in the line that doesn't know the game, gets seriously uncertain about the question and holds up the line for 10 minutes.

Other than that, I found the DL service on board amazingly good. Sure it is a huge difference to Singapore Airlines but it is actually not too bad at all and I like the food in BE better than most of the stuff I get in BC on British Airways.
Sebastian_R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 09, 10:10 pm   #18
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fairfield County, CT USA
Programs: AA EXP (2MM) / DL PM+Reserve / SPG Gold
Posts: 1,384
This is easy - KLM

If you're flying in a premium cabin, the choice is always very easy - select the foreign carrier (see note below) over the US carrier. I can't think of a trans-oceanic route which offers better J service on a US carrier than a foreign competitor.



Note: This statement applies to leading global airlines (KLM, Air France, Qantas, Cathay, etc), not small carriers domiciled in more economically underdeveloped countries.
__________________
Visit My FlightMemory Page
NYBanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 09, 10:10 pm   #19
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fairfield County, CT USA
Programs: AA EXP (2MM) / DL PM+Reserve / SPG Gold
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND76 View Post
I've had two outstanding roundtrips in BE this year, to LHR and back to PSA and back. The planes were clean, my seat worked, AVOD worked, the power port worked, the food tasted good, there was plenty of bracing booze, the service was personable and the flights were on time. What more could you want?
What foreign carriers have you flown?
__________________
Visit My FlightMemory Page
NYBanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 09, 11:39 pm   #20
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Programs: Delta DM/1.967 MM, Hertz Five Star, SW Rapid Rewards, Marriott Rewards, AMTRAK Guest Rewards
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYBanker View Post
What foreign carriers have you flown?
AF, BA, KL and FI for TATL routes; AF, KL and Ryanair for intra-Europe routes. Within continental Europe, I try to take the train whenever I can.

I had a chance to sample J on both AF and DL within a 3 week period earlier this year. I thought the food was a little bit better and the portions were a bit bigger on DL than on AF this summer. In the main, I had excellent experiences on both carriers.
ND76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 09, 5:09 am   #21
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,165
KLM would be the least worst of two evils.
Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 09, 7:13 am   #22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: So Fla & NYC
Programs: DL DM, CO GE/MM, SPG Plat, MT Plat, etc., etc.
Posts: 10,322
We do prefer the KL WBC seats to those on the DL 763. I will agree that the service is a bit better on DL and the food generally much better but as far as we are concerned, it is all about the seats.

I've been doing this too long to care much about the quality of the airline food.
monitor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 09, 8:38 am   #23
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CRW
Programs: NW Plat; DL; UA; CO; AA; AXP Plat; SPG Gold; HHonors Silver
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by brenig View Post
Choose KLM WBC !!! Delta BE sucks. Have had only bad experiences on Delta and only good experience on KLM.
I am flying KLM WBC ATL-LHR (via AMS) tomorrow and am very much looking forward to the service.

I am returning on a NW 764 with the lie-flat seats via DTW. It will be an interesting comparison between the two flights.
jxwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 09, 11:18 am   #24
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: DL GM
Posts: 302
KLM - better service, smiling FAs, better IFE compared to DL's older config 763s. Delta's food and wine selections are superior in my opinion. The food on my last two flights on WBC was inedible.
DeltaNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 09, 12:59 pm   #25
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,970
What happened airliners.net breakdown for the day?

NYBanker, take a look at the last 2000 posts on FT comparing AF and DL Biz TA, You'll find that while AF may have a strong point or two, that DL wins in about 90% of posts and DL in 10% of posts. And I am speaking as a plat for at least a decade on both AF/KL AND DL, not to mention a Gold BAEC member for most years since the programme started and an LH Senator for the last 7 years. Citing Qantas or Cathay in your post means little as each competes on a grand total of one route with Delta, one through a tag-on flight through NRT which was not a Delta flight a year ago, and the other which Delta just started five minutes ago.
hfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 09, 11:51 pm   #26
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: KLM Platinum, M&M Senator, CO Gold
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND76 View Post
I've had two outstanding roundtrips in BE this year, to LHR and back to PSA and back. The planes were clean, my seat worked, AVOD worked, the power port worked, the food tasted good, there was plenty of bracing booze, the service was personable and the flights were on time. What more could you want?
A plane that is not close to 20 years old (767-300...)
brenig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30, 09, 12:41 am   #27
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,970
Then its really good that youa re not referrring to Delta as the 763ER fleet which is what we are speaking about averages only 13.1 years old, a twenty year old average as you stated would be in fact 50% older than they really are.

In any case what a junior bush league non-FF mistake to make. What is important is how well the a/c is maintained and what the interior is like. I can name quite a lot of brand new a/c and configurations that absolutely stink, and I can name quite a few "classic" airframes and modern products which beat anything new in the sky.
hfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30, 09, 4:20 am   #28
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: DL Gold, US, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,629
I like KL WBC better. The delft house is a very nice touch.
__________________
I'm in the vicinity of an area adjacent to a location.
florin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30, 09, 5:58 am   #29
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FLL
Programs: DL PM/MM ♦M|HH♦|Marr Slvr|CO UA AA US|Pri Cub Plat|SPG|Avis 1st|Htz 5*
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND76 View Post
...What more could you want?
A little Dutch house filled with gin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian_R View Post
Think that DL BE is usually ok but DL has (as many other American Carriers) the policy of asking you 2 sets of stupid security questions (frist at the checkin, then at the gate).
Those security questions asked at check-in stopped years ago. At the time, it wasn't many American carriers it was all American carriers. They were stupid but only if you think they questions were posed to catch terrorists. They were actually posed in order to uncover ignorant people that would unknowingly transport hazardous materials, explosives, or drugs for someone else.

Departing the U.S. I have not been asked those questions for several years. However returning to the U.S. from Europe I have been asked once in my last three trips: at CDG but not PRG or FRA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hfly View Post
What happened airliners.net breakdown for the day?

NYBanker, take a look at the last 2000 posts on FT comparing AF and DL Biz TA, You'll find that while AF may have a strong point or two, that DL wins in about 90% of posts and DL in 10% of posts. And I am speaking as a plat for at least a decade on both AF/KL AND DL, not to mention a Gold BAEC member for most years since the programme started and an LH Senator for the last 7 years. Citing Qantas or Cathay in your post means little as each competes on a grand total of one route with Delta, one through a tag-on flight through NRT which was not a Delta flight a year ago, and the other which Delta just started five minutes ago.
Did you mean DL wins 90% and AF 10%?

Based on this thread I might consider KLM biz class in the future over the pond. My only KLM flight was AMS > Stockholm in first. It was horrible. 3-3 in 1st class !?! I sat in the middle. Ouch. Seats were no different than the seats in coach just slightly more pitch - and I do mean slightly. The food was bad, the service was bad... all in all it left a sour taste in my mouth for KLM.

I am now craving a little Dutch house with gin.
__________________
3/4/10 | MMMs: 1,070,805 | MQMs: 55,047 | '10 UGs 13/13 100% | ♦M - 2010!
Evan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30, 09, 6:26 am   #30
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CPH
Programs: DL Plat, SK Silver, BA Silver - Gift, CO Plat - Match
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan! View Post
Based on this thread I might consider KLM biz class in the future over the pond.
I wouldn't actively seek them out myself. KL WBC is okay, but nothing special. The seats are definitely, YMMV. Myself, I think the new-ish seats on the 747 and 772 are pretty bad considering how new they are. The seats on the 763 aren't any better, but if I was avoiding DL because I didn't like the 763 seats, I would be looking for a bigger step up (BA, AF, etc) than the KL seat.

Aside from the seat, I think they are pretty comparable. The DL service is friendlier, but the KL service is usually pretty good, just more reserved. I think the food on DL is better, as is the booze, but KL seems to put a bit more effort into the wines. The ground service is almost certainly a wash, as I suspect they largely use the same facilities and staff in a lot of locations.

In the case of the OP, I would choose on departure time and airport preference.

FWIW, there ain't much gin in the houses - maybe a shot or so. I have a few kicking around the house, but they are basically just clutter. Unless you are the type that collects hummels, I can't see how this tips the balance at all.
pbarnette is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:04 am.




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2