MD-90 Aircraft: The Definitive Thread

Old May 14, 2001, 1:56 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Programs: Vanishing
Posts: 1,681
MD-90 Aircraft: The Definitive Thread

I finally saw an MD-90 in the latest paint scheme! For a very long time, only the L-1011 and the MD-90 were left in the old paint job. I could understand that not much was done to the L-1011's, after all they are on their way out. That led me to believe that there was some truth to the rumour that MD-90 was on its way out too. But now with the latest "Deltaflot" paint job, maybe they are going to stay?

BTW, ship 9215 was the one I saw. Are there any more out there?

/Pete
L-1011 is offline  
Old May 14, 2001, 2:07 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: SAN Diego (Hillcrest); formerly LEXington, KY; still like the nym
Programs: DL Platinum; Marriott Lifetime Platinum; married to Hilton Elite
Posts: 3,027
L1011: MD90's & MD11's are on an accelerated depreciation schedule to be retired over the next six or seven years. This is part of the plan to reduce fleet types. Probably the one you saw simply got to a point where it had to be repainted.

Sadly, all 1011's (your moniker) will be gone by August. *sob*

------------------
"Service" should be a noun, not a verb.
LexPassenger is offline  
Old May 14, 2001, 2:30 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: lax
Posts: 727
I believe when an aircraft is due for it's major overhaul, the plane is taken apart, inspected, and put back together. At this point, a new paint job is applied.
orix is offline  
Old May 15, 2001, 11:19 am
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orange County, CA
Programs: Vanishing
Posts: 1,681
At what time do the aircrafts get their major overhaul? The oldest MD-90's seem to be from 1995, so that makes it 6 years of service before a new paint job. Some other aircrafts have had two paint jobs in that time (I've seen some with both the "Delta Air Lines" and the "Deltaflot" paint schemes). The MD-11's have had a new paint for quite some time now, and they are about of the same vintage and the -90.

/Pete
L-1011 is offline  
Old May 17, 2001, 6:25 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: ATL, DL GM
Posts: 148
Every 6 years is about right for a "D Check" when they take the airplane down to bare metal during the overhaul.
ATLJV is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2004, 5:28 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the home of the "brave"?
Programs: Whatever will get me out of Y and into C or F!
Posts: 3,748
Whither the MD-90?

So what will happen to the ultra-quiet final-product-of-MacDAC* of which DL has 15 (or is it 16?) examples?

Could they be re-cofigured into a dedicated shuttle/charter fleet to operate BOS-LGA/LGA-DCA *and* BOS-DCA (goodbye CRJ'S!) service, with the possibility of being available for charter service on weekends?

That would help DL do away with the folly of the one-class "Shuttle" 738's ending up scattered in terra incognita (i.e. the world outside of the NEC )and allow DL to retire/sell the 733's, Glass- or Classic-cockpit.

Or is the range of the MD-90 too good to have them not fly long routes?

What say you?

*(Assumes that you believe that the Boeing merger was not in fact the takeover of Boeing by Stonecipher et al that many think it truely was)
HeHateY is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2004, 5:51 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: MA
Programs: DL DM/2MM Marriott Platinum, HH Diamond,
Posts: 8,906
They're outta here... no way to keep up such a small fleet economically.
RobertS975 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2004, 7:54 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Augusta, GA, USA
Programs: DL FC, NW
Posts: 3,522
Originally Posted by RobertS975
They're outta here... no way to keep up such a small fleet economically.

I always thought they were similar in maintanance to the MD-80 series.
USCGamecock is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2004, 8:27 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SEA
Posts: 12,485
Originally Posted by USCGamecock
I always thought they were similar in maintanance to the MD-80 series.
No, they're a redesigned version, with different engines and wings. A fair comparison would be a 737-300 and a 737-700.

The MD-90 maintenance base is in DFW - another bad sign for the fleet type.
sxf24 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2004, 10:20 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gorham, Maine, USA
Programs: Delta Gold, UA Platinum
Posts: 193
$40 Oil Might Trump Commonality Madness

Originally Posted by RobertS975
They're outta here... no way to keep up such a small fleet economically.
With $40 Oil, and assuming the MD-90 is way better on fuel than the MD-88 and 737-300, Delta may keep them. I'm sure the cost per trip difference on longer legs in the MD-90 is significanly lower than the MD-88. I know Airtran was pleasantly surprised when the 717 ended up being 25% better on fuel than their old DC-9's. Commonality madness made sense when Oil was $25 per barrel or lower, now it just seems silly. I bet Frontier just loves those A-318's with oil at $44 per barrel!
veliger is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2004, 7:15 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Just who do you think you're kidding?
Programs: I do this for a living.
Posts: 7,486
Originally Posted by veliger

I know Airtran was pleasantly surprised when the 717 ended up being 25% better on fuel than their old DC-9's.
Seeing as the 717's systems are 20 years newer than the old DC-9s, one would hope for better fuel economy!

BTW I happen to love the 717, pity it appears never to have caught on in the airline industry.
OttoGraham is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2004, 9:56 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LAX
Posts: 80
I would expect to see the MD-90s flying out of SLC primarily. They are not on the list of the 4 fleet types to be retired.
noserider76 is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2004, 1:10 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Delta Gold Medallion
Posts: 180
Originally Posted by noserider76
I would expect to see the MD-90s flying out of SLC primarily. They are not on the list of the 4 fleet types to be retired.
Source: Aviation Daily The airline also may look to drop its fleet of 16 MD-90s, which are operate with different engines than its fleet of 120 MD-88s.
miles addict is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2004, 4:55 pm
  #14  
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,577
Originally Posted by veliger
Commonality madness made sense when Oil was $25 per barrel or lower, now it just seems silly. I bet Frontier just loves those A-318's with oil at $44 per barrel!
From what I've heard the A-318 is a horribly inefficient plane compared to other aircraft with similar seating capacities because of the fact it's based off a much larger aircraft and they were not able to scale down the weight of the aircraft nearly in proportion to its passenger load. The A-318 only makes sense from a commonality stand point, certainly not from an efficiency stand point.
Beckles is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2004, 6:58 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: somewhere
Programs: Bubba's Porn Shack Platinum Member, McDonald's Million Burger Eater, Guzzler's Gin Super Drunk Membe
Posts: 354
actually I've read the 90s are more expensive to operate than the 88s. can't remember where otherwise I'd post a link.
El Perro is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.