Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

LAX-DCA,BOS-SFO become Delta One flights

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LAX-DCA,BOS-SFO become Delta One flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2017, 9:33 pm
  #91  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Originally Posted by jrl767
DL thought about it (route proving runs in Dec 2008) but to my knowledge never actually operated it

my office in Crystal City had a view of the airport; I had been a DL regular for about five years at that point (mostly WAS-XXX-DAY/LAX/SEA/VPS/BOS/ABQ), so I would have been all over a DCA<-->ATL trip on a 763
Sorry for confusion, I wasn't referring to just DL when making the comment.
flyerCO is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 9:40 pm
  #92  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,363
the only other candidates would have been AA and UA, and I'm quite certain neither of them did much if anything more than that sort of route proving
jrl767 is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 9:44 pm
  #93  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Originally Posted by jrl767
the only other candidates would have been AA and UA, and I'm quite certain neither of them did much if anything more than that sort of route proving
It's been at least 20 years, but UA used to fly 767 on some DCA routes.
flyerCO is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2017, 8:21 am
  #94  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,363
I think we'll have to agree to disagree ... again, I've been flying SEA/LAX<-->WAS since 1976 (and I was a UA regular 76-79, 82-86, and 90-92), and I can't recall any wide-body service (explicitly excluding route-proving runs) into or out of DCA on any airline
jrl767 is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2017, 9:03 am
  #95  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: Delta PM, Delta Reserve, Amex Plat, Bonvoy Gold, Hilton Diamond, Starbucks Gold ;)
Posts: 1,775
Originally Posted by flyerCO
It's been at least 20 years, but UA used to fly 767 on some DCA routes.
This has been debated on A.net and FT many times before. From what I've been told by airport officials there has not been regularly scheduled (other than special occasions) wide body service at DCA.

Space and runway length are two of the big issues.
1- Gates can't handle the length and wingspan of the aircraft.
2- Taxiways are narrow and have issues with the wingspan

Here's an article from last year when UA announced the 757-3
http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel...port/79768454/
DCAproducer is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 6:09 am
  #96  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mostly living in the basement
Programs: Newly minted free agent; MR LT(!)TE, HH SE, BA SECM, DL MM, UA PS, 2V Fanboi, CBP GE
Posts: 5,107
Originally Posted by pbarnette
From a business traffic perspective, I suspect that BOS-SFO was a no-brainer over BOS-LAX. There is much more synergy between the BOS and SFO economies than BOS and LAX. That isn't to say that there will be enough paid premium demand to support the route, but there is a much better chance than BOS-LAX, IMO.
When I looked at the DOT numbers in a previous incarnation of this discussion, BOS-SFO was a higher revenue route than BOS-LAX. (I didn't look at DCA-LAX.) But the numbers weren't that different from JFK-SEA, so I have a hard time believing this much service is sustainable over the long haul. I'd guess next year we're down to B6 and maybe 1 legacy carrier.
bennos is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 8:25 am
  #97  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by bennos
When I looked at the DOT numbers in a previous incarnation of this discussion, BOS-SFO was a higher revenue route than BOS-LAX. (I didn't look at DCA-LAX.) But the numbers weren't that different from JFK-SEA, so I have a hard time believing this much service is sustainable over the long haul. I'd guess next year we're down to B6 and maybe 1 legacy carrier.
When you speak of service, are you talking about the number of carriers and flights? If so, BOS-SFO has had at least 3 carriers for a long time. I don't think DL's two flights per day will change things and that there is plenty of room for at least 4 carriers.

The only thing I question is the viability of D1 level service. However, if it doesn't work on BOS-SFO, then I'd think it definitively proves that the market for domestic D1 service is limited to NYC-SFO/JFK.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 8:58 am
  #98  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,601
Originally Posted by jrl767
DL thought about it (route proving runs in Dec 2008) but to my knowledge never actually operated it

my office in Crystal City had a view of the airport; I had been a DL regular for about five years at that point (mostly WAS-XXX-DAY/LAX/SEA/VPS/BOS/ABQ), so I would have been all over a DCA<-->ATL trip on a 763
Well you missed your chance, multiple times.

DL scheduled the 76G fleet into DCA for the first Obama inauguration and after used it a few times around thanksgiving/Christmas.


Also, quick hint, before being so sure in telling people they are wrong, google it. Their is video and even a FT thread, with pics, of the DL 767 in DCA.




now having said that, not sure why its being discussed. A 767 to ATL is a completely different animal than a 767 to LAX.
Dawgfan6291 is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 9:22 am
  #99  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,009
Originally Posted by Dawgfan6291
Well you missed your chance, multiple times.

DL scheduled the 76G fleet into DCA for the first Obama inauguration and after used it a few times around thanksgiving/Christmas.


Also, quick hint, before being so sure in telling people they are wrong, google it. Their is video and even a FT thread, with pics, of the DL 767 in DCA.


now having said that, not sure why its being discussed. A 767 to ATL is a completely different animal than a 767 to LAX.
When people refer to "[regularly] scheduled" service, one-off events like presidential inaugurations are implicitly excluded.
moondog is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 9:31 am
  #100  
pvn
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEM
Programs: Starbucks Green Card
Posts: 5,431
Originally Posted by Dawgfan6291
.


Also, quick hint, before being so sure in telling people they are wrong, google it.
Good lord, he didn't say they were wrong. He said "to my knowledge [they] never actually operated it."
pvn is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 9:43 am
  #101  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: Hilton Diamond
Posts: 4,247
Originally Posted by DCAproducer
I was looking at the DCA-LAX flight for May a couple of weeks ago and the F cabin fares were around $900. Now they're starting around $1400. Well played Delta.

Anyways, I think it's nice to see the premium product come to DCA. I think D1 will do very well on this route and this really turns up the pressure on AS and AA which also operate this route.

I just want to confirm, it appears Regional Upgrade Certificates do work on the DL JFK-LAX/SFO D1 upgrades, but they haven't upgraded the chart on DL.com to indicate DCA. I'm assuming it will be the same.
http://www.delta.com/content/www/en_...tificates.html

I had already booked a DCA-LAX first for the end of October and now that flight is more twice the price I paid for it, so this is one instance I have lucked out with timing. For my return I am actually going to try Mint for the first time (SAN-JFK). I checked and I am still the only seat booked in the First (now Delta One) cabin on that flight so that price increase is totally Delta One related.

Last edited by Miesque; Mar 28, 2017 at 9:48 am
Miesque is online now  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 10:02 am
  #102  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The fact there have been a couple of wide-bodies into DCA over time does not = "regularly-scheduled" as most people would commonly understand the term. The issue of wide-body service at DCA has been beaten to death. It is simply not feasible as the airport is currently configured and would require giving up more than any current wide-body can currently provide.

Time to move on rather than playing word games.
Often1 is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 10:14 am
  #103  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,398
Originally Posted by WWads
Complimentary upgrades have been dropped from both routes.

I fully expect that both AA and UA will have to respond.
AA still gives complimentary upgrades on LAX/JFK to EP's. I don't see that changing on the LAX/DCA and BOS/SFO routes.
jamesteroh is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 11:19 am
  #104  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: MIA
Programs: AA EXP (AC), DL G (SC), Bonvoy LTP, & IHG AMB
Posts: 1,798
Originally Posted by pbarnette
The only thing I question is the viability of D1 level service. However, if it doesn't work on BOS-SFO, then I'd think it definitively proves that the market for domestic D1 service is limited to NYC-SFO/JFK.
I can only hope that D1 is viable and that the numbers bear out that the carriers left a lot of money on the table over the years by offering 737/57/A319/20 transcon service.

With DL entering the market, you'll have three carriers with lie-flat service: B6, DL, and UA. You'll have two carriers offering their premium transcon service: B6 and DL; three if UA makes this a 'ps' service. Then add in AS/VX who will presumably continue with an SFO flight ex-BOS. That's a lot of premium capacity. It will be interesting to see if AA enters the fray; highly unlikely for SFO, but possibly for LAX.
CHOPCHOP767 is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2017, 12:08 pm
  #105  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mostly living in the basement
Programs: Newly minted free agent; MR LT(!)TE, HH SE, BA SECM, DL MM, UA PS, 2V Fanboi, CBP GE
Posts: 5,107
Originally Posted by pbarnette
When you speak of service, are you talking about the number of carriers and flights? If so, BOS-SFO has had at least 3 carriers for a long time. I don't think DL's two flights per day will change things and that there is plenty of room for at least 4 carriers.

The only thing I question is the viability of D1 level service. However, if it doesn't work on BOS-SFO, then I'd think it definitively proves that the market for domestic D1 service is limited to NYC-SFO/JFK.
I just meant the premium service. DL couldn't make JFK-SEA D1 work with only 3 flights a day and no meaningful competition, and the BOS-SFO numbers are in the same ballpark (IIRC) as JFK-SEA.

If anything, this seems like the capacity dumping that the legacies used to do to prevent LCCs like B6 from gaining market share, just for premium seats now instead.
bennos is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.