Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Cruises
Sign in using an external account

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 12, 12, 10:21 pm   #16
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmwalker View Post
I can only speak for myself, a regular Carnival cruise passenger. If there is no incentive for me to book through a TA, I will just book directly on the Carnival website. Less hassle.

I think that the TAs that wanted this change just shot themselves in the foot and will lose a lot more business than they will gain from the "level playing field".
For me, it's no more hassle to use the TA as it is to use the Carnival PVP. While there is no incentive to use the TA, there isn't an incentive to not use one either. If Carnival would be willing to make it worth my while to use their guy instead of mine, I'll listen LOL.

Booking direct, you are in control of your own booking, where using a TA, you have to go through the agent to make changes to your reservation. I've never found this to be an issue for us. The only time I had to call the cruiseline direct was for our cruise leaving New York City on Sept 15, 2001. Obviously it wasn't going to still be sailing from there, and I needed to find out what was going on. I got the "You need to call your TA" line from the first person I spoke to, but I insisted I was the guy paying the bills and would be the one finding this info out right now. She put me to another agent who helped me out and that was that.
DanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 12, 7:37 am   #17
Moderator: Air Canada Aeroplan & Mileage Run Forum, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Posts: 38,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion View Post
Just remember a cruise line pays 17% + other goodies to a travel agent.
Being a TA I'll challenge that asumption as not being accurate all the time. TA commissions can run that high but it's by no means a blanket amount for all lines to all TA's always.
tcook052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 12, 9:03 am   #18
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: AMEX Plat, AAdvantage Gold, UA, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 814
Totally thought that the HUBRIS was the new CCL ship name....
brooklynmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 12, 11:23 pm   #19
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynmatt View Post
Totally thought that the HUBRIS was the new CCL ship name....
That'll be the name of the next ship they do the Destiny/Sunshine makeover on LOL.
DanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 12, 11:14 am   #20
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 37
Not hubris, strategy.

If Carnival is paying 17% or 14% off the top, they can probably afford to lose a few bookings to bring some of that cash back in-house. (My understanding is that is the percentage of the base fare, which itself can be 1/2 of the actual price on a cheap cruise, right?)

I will book though CCL going forward because I have had problems with several TAs who didn't understand what an FCC is, how to log an ES price drop, etc. Basic stuff.

I'd much prefer to play dial-an-answer with Carnival because they'll at least be willing to talk to me.
mikesteg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 26, 12, 12:54 am   #21
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,628
You are correct I agree 17% + goodies are not always paid to TA's

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcook052 View Post
Being a TA I'll challenge that asumption as not being accurate all the time. TA commissions can run that high but it's by no means a blanket amount for all lines to all TA's always.
Centurion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 26, 12, 1:07 am   #22
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynmatt View Post
Totally thought that the HUBRIS was the new CCL ship name....
What a great name to compete against RCL's new floating cities. The new Carnival Hubris a 15,000 passenger ship!
Centurion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 26, 12, 7:21 am   #23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bradenton, FL USA SRQ & TPA
Programs: AirTran Elite
Posts: 33,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesteg View Post
Not hubris, strategy.

If Carnival is paying 17% or 14% off the top, they can probably afford to lose a few bookings to bring some of that cash back in-house. (My understanding is that is the percentage of the base fare, which itself can be 1/2 of the actual price on a cheap cruise, right?)

I will book though CCL going forward because I have had problems with several TAs who didn't understand what an FCC is, how to log an ES price drop, etc. Basic stuff.

I'd much prefer to play dial-an-answer with Carnival because they'll at least be willing to talk to me.
I always booked with TA's until recently, for the bennies. I actually have found a really helpful Carnival PVP, though. I take the time to book through him on the phone rather than online, even, and I usually HATE talking to people when I can do something online instead.

For the first time ever I have a question related to a current cruise booking, and it was nice to call and get a helpful answer and get my problem taken care of right away.

My big project now is to squeeze in two mroe sailings in 2013 so that I can get Platinum under the current rules.
__________________
Let's go RAYS!
SRQ Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 12, 7:17 am   #24
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Programs: DL, UA, AA, US, Club Carlson, PC
Posts: 242
I wonder how this will impact cashback portal bookings? I've liked booking cruises via ShopDiscover/Cruise & Vacation Desk. It earned 5% cashback, (but apparently only on the cruise portion, not port fees/taxes), so it was really more like 2.5% cashback.

From the sounds of this policy, something like Chase Ultimate Rewards extra 4 UR/$ on cruise bookings would no longer be allowed in the future. They may have to exclude Carnival if they do such a promo again
centrifuge41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 12, 11:03 pm   #25
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4,756
I was pricing out a Carnival cruise for January and entered the details on cruise compete to see what results I got. 4 quotes came back with identical pricing and each had a couple things under special offers, such as an unspecified onboard credit (call to find out), or a logo item. One agency must be taking the $25 dollar limit thing and saying there isn't a limit to how many $25 items they can offer. I saw this in their quote:

Quote:
Choose from the following amenities based on the chart below:
$25 Shipboard credit
Wine
Photo Voucher
4-Drink Bar Coupon
12-Drink Soda Card
Multiple of an item is allowed.

Price* ----- # of Choices:
$600-$1000 -- 1
$1001-$1500 - 3
$1501-$2000 - 5
$2001-$2500 - 6
$2501-$3000 - 7
$3001-$3500 - 9
$3501 - Call

*# of Choices is based on the total price of the 1st and 2nd pax only.
Additional passengers are not counted towards total number of choices. Gratuities and air are not included in determining number of choices.
DanJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 12, 3:15 pm   #26
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Austin TX
Programs: AA EXP, ICH Plat
Posts: 1,436
Can someone explain why is it legal for a company to tell its independent sales agents that they cannot give rebates?

IF a TA says "spend $5k with our cruise agency on cruises in a year and we will send you a check for $500"...why can a cruise line stop that?

THANKS
__________________
May the upgrade gods look favorably upon you!!
alhcfp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 12, 4:40 pm   #27
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by alhcfp View Post
Can someone explain why is it legal for a company to tell its independent sales agents that they cannot give rebates?
For many years, it wasn't. About 5 years ago, Scalia et al changed the rules.
sonofzeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 12, 8:06 pm   #28
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Austin TX
Programs: AA EXP, ICH Plat
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofzeus View Post
For many years, it wasn't. About 5 years ago, Scalia et al changed the rules.
Can you give a case cite please?
__________________
May the upgrade gods look favorably upon you!!
alhcfp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 12, 11:27 pm   #29
Moderator: Air Canada Aeroplan & Mileage Run Forum, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Posts: 38,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by alhcfp View Post
Can someone explain why is it legal for a company to tell its independent sales agents that they cannot give rebates?
This isn't unique to travel as Bose is very stringent on it's retailers not discounting or rebating it's product.
tcook052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 12, 2:24 am   #30
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by alhcfp View Post
Can you give a case cite please?
Try this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leegin_...._v._PSKS,_Inc.
sonofzeus is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:17 am.




SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.