Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN or Signature) [2017>]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jan 16, 2017, 10:23 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: serpens


Older (archived) threads:
2012-2015 2016

What is EMV?
EMV is a standard for smart (or integrated-circuit, or chip) cards and the devices that can accept them. The standards are maintained by EMVCo and based on ISO 7816 (or ISO 14443 for contactless).

These cards come in two flavours: contact and contactless. Examples below:
----------------------------------------------------------

Notice the contactless indicator on the right-hand side (it looks like a sideways Wi-Fi symbol). It may also be found on the back of the card (for example, on the back of the new Costco credit card).


Where can I get a chip card?

Hawaiian717 operates a website with crowd-sourced information about various cards. You can adjust the search parameters to see cards with contactless, have PIN-primary authentication, etc.

Which businesses accept chip cards?

tmiw operates a website, also primarily crowd-sourced, that tracks chip-enabled merchants on a map. You can see if a merchant supports PIN, contactless, Quick Chip, et al.

Why doesn't my chip card ask for a PIN?

This is likely because you have a signature-preferring card. At this time, PIN-preferring cards issued in the US are rare. Not many financial institutions offer them; most of them instead provide Chip-and-Signature cards, which are programmed to prefer signature over PIN, if the card supports PIN at all.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?

To the cardholder, the only major difference is how they authenticate themselves at the point of sale. The cardholder inserts their card as normal; instead of signing a screen or receipt, they will be asked to enter their PIN on the keypad.

[spoiler]

A few financial institutions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees.

Why no PIN? (cont.)
American debit cards are unique because they are psuedo-PIN-preferring cards. which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN? (cont.)

Most cards issued in the US are programmed to prefer signature, so save very few instances, they will prompt for a signature (unless the merchant sets a signature waiver). A PIN may be necessary in countries with mostly PIN-preferring cards when using unattended terminals (such as pay-at-the-pump or mass transit). If the card has a PIN for backup verification or ATMs, then that PIN should work. Otherwise, the card will be rejected. If the card is rejected, then either a.) the transaction must be performed by an attendant or b.) an alternative payment method will be required.

Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM (Cardholder Verification Method) as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.


I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.


There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote its capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.

In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s, and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the de-facto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN or Signature) [2017>]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2017, 11:54 am
  #61  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by NYCFlyer10001
BoA's credit cards only support Online PIN, and it's below Signature, so it makes sense that it would not be used in most circumstances.
It depends on how much lower. Early BofA chip credit cards had online PIN just below signature, meaning that PIN could potentially be required at gas pumps and other unattended terminals even in the US. Current ones, however, have it last--meaning that it won't be asked for in the US and rarely abroad. Their debit cards still have it just below signature on the global AID.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2017, 2:41 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by Majuki
Like you, I am pragmatic about these matters. While I would prefer PIN-based cards, I couldn't really care about no CVM, PINs, signatures, or contactless as long as the payment method works. I don't want to be inconvenienced and have to wait in the train ticket line for 60 minutes or have alarms blaring and red lights flashing at self checkouts saying, "SIGNATURE VERIFICATION REQUIRED!!!!" while the locals are zipping through. I remember one case 10 years ago where I had to walk for an hour to get home because the metro ticket vending machines asked for a PIN on my swipe-and-sign Visa. Those are the situations I am trying to avoid, and I recognize having a PIN-preferring card or one with offline PIN capability (Barclaycard) as a backup is useful.
We are like the voices of reason here. I came aboard on the long closed other thread when there was an increasing problem with chipless USA credit cards not being accepted in countries outside the USA. While the problem never reached a crisis stage there was a growing degree of inconveniene.

The US banks were finally forced to go to emv cards not so much because they cared about our inconveniences but because fraud was becoming a greater and greater isssue and the USA was becoming the fraud capital of the western world. We got our emv but of course we were disappointed when it became apparent for the most part we were getting chip and signature with some issuers giving us cards with pin capabilities in kiosks. We worried the problem had hardly been resolved. We were assured mc/visa would be taking steps to make sure our cards were universally honored.

One has to grudgingly admit for the most part the chip and signature cards are honored. Sure there are a few instances of problems, especially when off the beaten track for tourists, but hardly overwhelming. The forum has now become not so much worrying about having our cards not honored but rather such and such domestic merchants have activated their emv terminals. I, in all due respect to everybody else, just don't understand this fascination with this. The people here are smart enough to understand that we indeed have zero liability for fraud and quite frankly it makes little difference whether a merchant processes a transaction with or without a pin, whether a pin is online or offline and things of that ilk. What I am most interested in, and the reason I continue to come here, is what information people can provide where there is difficulty in using a chip and signature card. Those instances do seem to be few and far between thank goodness.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2017, 8:37 pm
  #63  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Ruby's Diner uses VX805s attached to IBM POS hardware. POStouch shows up on their screensaver (the software they use, perhaps). The VX805s are not customer accessible, even in the takeout area, and there are signs saying to "pay your server" vs. paying at the front. Receipt:



My suspicion is that PIN is disabled on the terminals. Interestingly they also show up on the Mastercard map but I don't see how anyone would be able to use contactless there.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2017, 11:17 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,722
Originally Posted by tmiw
Ruby's Diner uses VX805s attached to IBM POS hardware. POStouch shows up on their screensaver (the software they use, perhaps). The VX805s are not customer accessible, even in the takeout area, and there are signs saying to "pay your server" vs. paying at the front. Receipt:



My suspicion is that PIN is disabled on the terminals. Interestingly they also show up on the Mastercard map but I don't see how anyone would be able to use contactless there.
Looks a lot like Diary Queen locations with MX915's receipt which is also has IBM/Toshiba POS hardware, but MC ctls only works there and Visa does not. Chip is enabled of course but ctls is MSD only. So your saying that sign means that they want people to hand their cards to the server?
scibot is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2017, 11:19 pm
  #65  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by scibot
So your saying that sign means that they want people to hand their cards to the server?
Correct. It's like any other American restaurant pre-EMV.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2017, 11:21 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
Ruby's probably has the "pay your server" signs because they used to do pay at the front. But they changed to having the server handle the payment a couple of years ago at least.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 8:26 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by scibot
Looks a lot like Diary Queen locations with MX915's receipt which is also has IBM/Toshiba POS hardware, but MC ctls only works there and Visa does not. Chip is enabled of course but ctls is MSD only. So your saying that sign means that they want people to hand their cards to the server?
I used Visa contactless numerous times on DQ MX915s
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 9:46 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Star Alliance Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by tmiw
Ruby's Diner uses VX805s attached to IBM POS hardware. POStouch shows up on their screensaver (the software they use, perhaps). The VX805s are not customer accessible, even in the takeout area, and there are signs saying to "pay your server" vs. paying at the front. Receipt:



My suspicion is that PIN is disabled on the terminals. Interestingly they also show up on the Mastercard map but I don't see how anyone would be able to use contactless there.
That EMV receipt is identical to the IHOP one I had and pin was disabled.
reclusive46 is online now  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 2:45 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HPN
Programs: not anymore! I'm FREE!
Posts: 3,459
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
We are like the voices of reason here. I came aboard on the long closed other thread when there was an increasing problem with chipless USA credit cards not being accepted in countries outside the USA. While the problem never reached a crisis stage there was a growing degree of inconveniene.

The US banks were finally forced to go to emv cards not so much because they cared about our inconveniences but because fraud was becoming a greater and greater isssue and the USA was becoming the fraud capital of the western world. We got our emv but of course we were disappointed when it became apparent for the most part we were getting chip and signature with some issuers giving us cards with pin capabilities in kiosks. We worried the problem had hardly been resolved. We were assured mc/visa would be taking steps to make sure our cards were universally honored.

One has to grudgingly admit for the most part the chip and signature cards are honored. Sure there are a few instances of problems, especially when off the beaten track for tourists, but hardly overwhelming. The forum has now become not so much worrying about having our cards not honored but rather such and such domestic merchants have activated their emv terminals. I, in all due respect to everybody else, just don't understand this fascination with this. The people here are smart enough to understand that we indeed have zero liability for fraud and quite frankly it makes little difference whether a merchant processes a transaction with or without a pin, whether a pin is online or offline and things of that ilk. What I am most interested in, and the reason I continue to come here, is what information people can provide where there is difficulty in using a chip and signature card. Those instances do seem to be few and far between thank goodness.
Well said, although the claim that chip-and-signature is rarely problematic abroad is debatable. The Amsterdam public transit system and Netherlands rail system are hardly off the beaten track, but good luck trying to use a chip/sig card at their automats rather than standing in line to purchase at the counter.
snic is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:39 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by snic
Well said, although the claim that chip-and-signature is rarely problematic abroad is debatable. The Amsterdam public transit system and Netherlands rail system are hardly off the beaten track, but good luck trying to use a chip/sig card at their automats rather than standing in line to purchase at the counter.
Noted and logged. But then again, at least from my experiences, thd Netherlands has always been a problem for using credit cards, especially foreign ones and that goes back a long way. The Dutch National Railways has also always been a problem in using their kiosks for buying rail tickets although the Amsterdam Centraal Station has always had 1 window where cre foreign credit cards were honored.

But I am sure some people have complained and it is more on mc/visa for having allowed this to continue. And I think you would agree; it would not be economical for the US banks to embrace chip and pin with all its added costs, at least to their eyes, just so a few tourists could use their cards on the Amsterdam public transport system. Now if you couldn't use your chip and signature cards in the Paris Metro, that might be a different story, eh.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:44 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
Noted and logged. But then again, at least from my experiences, thd Netherlands has always been a problem for using credit cards, especially foreign ones and that goes back a long way. The Dutch National Railways has also always been a problem in using their kiosks for buying rail tickets although the Amsterdam Centraal Station has always had 1 window where cre foreign credit cards were honored.

But I am sure some people have complained and it is more on mc/visa for having allowed this to continue. And I think you would agree; it would not be economical for the US banks to embrace chip and pin with all its added costs, at least to their eyes, just so a few tourists could use their cards on the Amsterdam public transport system. Now if you couldn't use your chip and signature cards in the Paris Metro, that might be a different story, eh.
What costs? The terminals already here can take chip and PIN. The ONLY industry that has to change at all is the ever so stubborn restaurant industry.
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 3:57 pm
  #72  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by RedLight2015
What costs? The terminals already here can take chip and PIN. The ONLY industry that has to change at all is the ever so stubborn restaurant industry.
And the ~1 million (?) Square merchants too.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 4:04 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by RedLight2015
What costs? The terminals already here can take chip and PIN. The ONLY industry that has to change at all is the ever so stubborn restaurant industry.
Not to necessarily defend the banks' decisions on this but...

"I forgot my pin." (from a person whose pin is 5317 but keeps entering 5371).

People have three or four or more cards. Do they make the pins the same or do they have to memorize different pins? What about the infrastructure to change pins? Should pins be online or offline?

As I've said, and I want to be clear about it, had it been up to me I would have preferred chip and pin. But I do understand there are good reasons that make chip and signature more user friendly. I really do prefer the way we do things here with no cvm for small purchases and frankly value convenience more than the worry about fraud. At least for now, there is hardly any cloning being done on emv compliant cards. That is not to guarantee it won't happen in the future.

Let me ask you, as a consumer, why do you prefer pin if for no other reason than the slight chance, and it is slight thank goodness, there are a few places worldwide where the card lacking a pin may not be honored. As long (assuming you are from the United States) as your card works here, is it the possibility of fraud that makes you prefer pins? I will agree that I get po'd when I am in London and try to use a self service at a convenience store that I have to wait for a clerk to come over and get my signature for a 2 quid purchase but other than that, why should I care if the transaction goes through? The bottom line, of course, is not whether it is or isn't more convenient to us as consumers but the banks' studies that their losses due to fraud for lost or stolen cards is far less than the cost of converting to a pin infrastructure. Whether we like it or not, that remains the bottom line for the banks.

Last edited by JEFFJAGUAR; Jan 7, 2017 at 4:24 pm
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 4:09 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,592
Originally Posted by tmiw
And the ~1 million (?) Square merchants too.
I believe Square made that reader specifically so that indie merchants would have a more economical option for chip and contactless, therefore being more likely to upgrade. Rather than spending $150 for the Miura, they only spend $50. It was even effectively free at one point.
emmanuel_t is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2017, 6:02 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HPN
Programs: not anymore! I'm FREE!
Posts: 3,459
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
Let me ask you, as a consumer, why do you prefer pin if for no other reason than the slight chance, and it is slight thank goodness, there are a few places worldwide where the card lacking a pin may not be honored. As long (assuming you are from the United States) as your card works here, is it the possibility of fraud that makes you prefer pins? I will agree that I get po'd when I am in London and try to use a self service at a convenience store that I have to wait for a clerk to come over and get my signature for a 2 quid purchase but other than that, why should I care if the transaction goes through?
Well, there are many Americans who spend a considerable amount of time abroad. I think it's reasonable to expect that our credit cards will work efficiently wherever we go - that, after all, is the promise the banks and networks make.

But even if you never set foot outside the USA, there are a few answers to your question, "why do you prefer PIN." First, there's a psychological answer: studies show that people are quite willing to incur a cost just to punish a rule breaker or cheater, even if incurring that cost results in no direct benefit. There's probably an evolutionary reason for that, but just at a basic level, we don't like cheaters and lawbreakers. We all know that cloning magstripe credit cards is a huge criminal industry, and chip-and-pin offers the best protection (for now) against that. Chip-and-pin costs me nothing in convenience or money, so of course I'm in favor of it if it will prevent theft.

You could say, "who cares, it's the banks that lose to these criminals, not the customer," but of course the banks just pass the costs on to their customers (in the form of higher interest rates and/or less generous points offers). In the short term, yes, it's costing a lot to convert to PIN terminals, and yes, merchants are bearing a lot of that cost and it's mostly the banks who will benefit, but that's a different debate.

Finally, I actually don't think there is any inconvenience to the customer to be forced to convert entirely to chip-and-PIN - in fact, it's the opposite. In my experience, chip-and-PIN transactions actually go faster than signature. And being asked to remember a 4 digit PIN is hardly different from being asked to remember it for my ATM card - in fact, I can set them up so they have the same PIN.
snic is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.