Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Tax Lien: Am I out of the game?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2016, 4:14 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 27
Tax Lien: Am I out of the game?

My wife currently has:
2/16 Chase Sapphire Preferred
2/16 Chase Ink Plus
12/15 Southwest Business
11/15 Southwest Premier
4/16 AMEX SPG Personal

Credit Karma shows 762 and 755 scores.

She had a state tax lien last year (2015) for late sales tax payments, it shows RELEASED DECEMBER 2015 on her credit report.

She applied for a Sapphire Reserve on 9/15 and was denied for 5/24. I thought the business cards would get around it but it's not really a shock.

She applied for a Citi AAdvantage Platinum today 9/22 and was instantly denied. She called and they advised it was for the tax lien.

Is it a waste of time to apply for further cards? Maybe just Citi cards? Or maybe it's just business cards?

I wanted to get some input before trying my luck again and burning up inquiries. I had my eye on the AMEX BRG Card when the offer is right, but now I'm afraid it'll be a no-go. Thank you guys so much!
Lancerguy is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2016, 4:33 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sunny AZ
Programs: HH Diamond, Sixt Platinum, IHG Spire Ambassador, Marriott/SPG Gold .....
Posts: 3,208
She had 6 new cards (as the business one is from Chase so they know about that CC) so not 5/24 compliant
blitzen is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2016, 7:10 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 27
OK, but my question was really about the tax lien and ability to continue to apply for cards.

Thanks for the insight though!
Lancerguy is offline  
Old Sep 23, 2016, 5:22 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
It sounds like the lien is reported under public record.

Unless the record can be pulled, no joy for sure.

The even more bad news - it can last 7 years.
garykung is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2016, 10:09 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: LAX, LGB, SNA
Programs: AA EXP OWE, DL DM ST+, AS MVPG, UA, BA, WN CP, Hyatt E, Ritz Plat, HH GM
Posts: 3,185
Originally Posted by garykung
It sounds like the lien is reported under public record.

Unless the record can be pulled, no joy for sure.

The even more bad news - it can last 7 years.
It's actually on record for 7 years from last reported date. No less, unless "forcibly" taken off.
hiima is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2016, 12:05 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: DCA
Posts: 818
It sounds like she had no problem getting 3+ cards in the last year, presumably with this reflecting on her report (correct?). Given that I'm not sure why you'd be worried about it being an issue with other banks? Chase is pretty strict with their underwriting standards so if they were fine giving her new CCs I imagine Citi, BofA, etc. will be fine.
bodiddely is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2016, 2:26 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 530
there are DPs that chase does not count Chase Biz (at least Ink) against 5/24
runb4fun is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2016, 4:34 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by bodiddely
It sounds like she had no problem getting 3+ cards in the last year, presumably with this reflecting on her report (correct?). Given that I'm not sure why you'd be worried about it being an issue with other banks? Chase is pretty strict with their underwriting standards so if they were fine giving her new CCs I imagine Citi, BofA, etc. will be fine.
Correct! She was able to get 3 cards this year. She applied for a Citi AAdvantage card and was denied strictly on the grounds she had a tax lien, that's where my worry came in. That was this month.
Lancerguy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.