Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2015, 9:08 am
  #12661  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by joshwex90
In theory nice, but doesn't work when you're abroad and/or just don't have general access to a phone for SMS. Or when someone else wants to use your number to pay for something (child/spouse somewhere else).
That's why email would be included as an option as well--Chase seems to allow that for their 2FA with no issues that I know of.

Originally Posted by fliesdelta
How often do you order things online while abroad?
I've done it a few times. I just make sure I use a card that I didn't submit a travel notification for (not sure that matters though).

Originally Posted by AllieKat
I don't think some people get it. PIN isn't about "fitting in" like wearing what locals wear. It's about not having hassles. Hassles that apply in the US too. ID checks and nonsense like that. PIN makes shopping easier, safer and more convenient. And it would in the US, in the long run, as well.
There's all sorts of things merchants are supposed to be doing. Like, making people sign their cards if the card says "ask for ID" or comparing signatures. Or actually comparing the signature on the PIN pad/receipt with the one on the card. They don't though, so scribbling something isn't a big deal for people. ID checks at least indicate that the store's a bit more serious about security, even if they're not allowed.

That's why if Visa's serious about signature as a form of security (not simply as a "promise to pay back the bank"), they need to crack down on merchants that don't do everything they're supposed to. Or switch to something else, whether that's PIN or simply not bothering with anything other than the bank's own internal controls.

Originally Posted by NYCFlyer10001
Shopping is already 100% safe for Americans because we have 0 liability. PINs are to protect the bank's money, not yours.
It's probably unlikely among the FT crowd but a fair number of people use debit cards as their primary/only card. Even with Visa/MC's zero liability you may still be out the money for a period of time until the bank finishes their investigation. Good luck trying to pay bills if you don't have any sort of cushion for emergencies. Mandatory PIN is a good idea for debit simply because of that possibility, but since that's apparently not happening credit cards are still going to be better from a consumer risk standpoint if you're able to get one.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 9:47 am
  #12662  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
...and of course that's why it isn't very bright to use a debit card's "credit card capabilities" in lieu of a real credit card. Your credit card gets hacked, a little inconvenience (notifying your automatic billers of your new number, expiration date, security code but then again you have to do this whenever the old card expires, waiting for the new card to arrive (simple solution of course have 2 or 3 cards with you when travelling as I really believe most here do and that's about it today). There was a time when with many banks you had to get a police case number yada yada yada but most banks no longer do that; they do investigate but we'll assume here nobody is trying to pull hanky panky. And while I agree with Allie, sometimes it is inconvenient to use a signature credit card at kiosks and one can lose their patience as I have from time to time there are solutions even to that namely not to bother with signatures for small purchases (we all know here that nobody looks at signatures anyway and even abroad few clerks if any ever say anything and ID checks are not all that often employed) and to hope the networks more vigorously enforce all cards are valid. As long as I can use my card(s) everywhere, I don't lay awake at night worrying that might card might get hacked. It is inevitable it is going to happen, unfortunately, and I suspect that even when the US completes its transition to emv, the vermin running these credit card hacking organizations will either switch to online fraud or will begin working on hacking tbe emv chips even those with pin preference. Again, I'm not saying it's a bad idea to go with pins, I certainly state again I would have preferred that for uniformity sake but recognize there is nothing I can do about it other than use on of the available alternatives which I carry as backups but certainly don't use a my primary cards unless they improve their rewards programs.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 10:37 am
  #12663  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by tmiw
I've done it a few times. I just make sure I use a card that I didn't submit a travel notification for (not sure that matters though).
I no longer do the travel notification nonsense, and have had no issues. If a bank declines my card (which has only happened when NOT travelling, oddly enough), I'll simply call them to get the block lifted and politely inform them that due to the hassle, the card will be going down to the back of my wallet.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 10:43 am
  #12664  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by NYCFlyer10001
Shopping is already 100% safe for Americans because we have 0 liability. PINs are to protect the bank's money, not yours.
That's the sort of attitude that means international organised crime can be funded by credit card fraud.

Too many US issuers waive fraudulent charges in the name of consumer convenience, instead of targeting the places that the fraud takes place.

Make no mistake. You're ultimately going to pay for the fraud through higher fees. That's not to mention how inconvenient and disruptive fraud can be to the cardholder.
Daveoc64 is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 11:11 am
  #12665  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by Daveoc64
That's the sort of attitude that means international organised crime can be funded by credit card fraud.

Too many US issuers waive fraudulent charges in the name of consumer convenience, instead of targeting the places that the fraud takes place.

Make no mistake. You're ultimately going to pay for the fraud through higher fees. That's not to mention how inconvenient and disruptive fraud can be to the cardholder.
...and so your solution? Make consumers jump through hoops to get fraudulent charges removed from their accounts?
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 11:52 am
  #12666  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
...and so your solution? Make consumers jump through hoops to get fraudulent charges removed from their accounts?
Make fraud harder by removing as many avenues as possible. Chip & Signature solves the cloning problem but not the lost and stolen problem. Chip & PIN solves that too (or makes it notably harder since they have to get the PIN somehow too, compared to a signature nobody checks and is probably on the back of the card anyway).

Zero liability may mean that there is no direct cost to the consumer, but they have to make up the cost somewhere. Whether it means higher merchant fees, annual fees, interest rates, or reduced reward and perks, it comes from somewhere. Remember, sooner or later, one way or another, the consumer pays for everything.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 12:41 pm
  #12667  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by Daveoc64
Make no mistake. You're ultimately going to pay for the fraud through higher fees.
Originally Posted by Hawaiian717
Zero liability may mean that there is no direct cost to the consumer, but they have to make up the cost somewhere. Whether it means higher merchant fees, annual fees, interest rates, or reduced reward and perks, it comes from somewhere. Remember, sooner or later, one way or another, the consumer pays for everything.
There's no guarantee that those consumer costs will go away if we were to adopt everything possible (mandatory PIN/CDCVM for in-person transactions and mandatory 3D Secure for all online transactions). As we've seen when Durbin capped debit interchange, debit card rewards pretty much disappeared and prices at the store did not go down for consumers. Why would they forego additional profit when the market could obviously bear pre-Durbin prices?

If things on the credit side were to play out much like they did for Durbin, PIN would solely be a feel good measure for consumers without much other benefit for them. Credit card rewards probably wouldn't change in either direction, but neither would things like AF or APR or interchange rates (unless the government decided to cap the latter too like for debit).
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 2:22 pm
  #12668  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
...and so your solution? Make consumers jump through hoops to get fraudulent charges removed from their accounts?
No.

From a consumer point of view you wouldn't need to change much.

Give the customer the courtesy credit (like now), but actually pursue a chargeback - even if it's a low amount. $10 or so isn't a lot to an issuer, but if a fraudulent operation is putting through a lot of $10 transactions on different cards it soon adds up.

EMV is obviously a good move too.
Daveoc64 is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 2:37 pm
  #12669  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
I had always swallowed the issuer line that cloning/skimming was the problem in the US and that card loss was too small a problem to worry about - hence the signature / no CVM preference. Came across these FTC stats that suggest that while cloning is the largest problem in the US, lost or stolen is almost as much. Perhaps there is some hope that once the EMV cards are fully deployed, PIN preference won't be far behind.

2014 Fraud Distribution
Counterfeit Credit Cards 37 %
Lost of Stolen 23 %
No-Card Fraud (i.e. giving card information to a non-legit telemarketer) 10 %
Stolen cards during mailing fraud 7 %
Identity-Theft Fraud 4 %
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 3:00 pm
  #12670  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by glbltvlr
I had always swallowed the issuer line that cloning/skimming was the problem in the US and that card loss was too small a problem to worry about - hence the signature / no CVM preference. Came across these FTC stats that suggest that while cloning is the largest problem in the US, lost or stolen is almost as much. Perhaps there is some hope that once the EMV cards are fully deployed, PIN preference won't be far behind.

2014 Fraud Distribution
Counterfeit Credit Cards 37 %
Lost of Stolen 23 %
No-Card Fraud (i.e. giving card information to a non-legit telemarketer) 10 %
Stolen cards during mailing fraud 7 %
Identity-Theft Fraud 4 %
Is that by number of incidents or by total financial loss? Total financial loss to the banks from lost/stolen is a lot less than counterfeit (see page 28 of http://www.mapacific.com/files/42820...%20Outlook.pdf, though that only has estimated numbers for 2014).

There's some other interesting information in that document too. I prefer PIN but after reading that and some other stuff I understand the banks' rationale a bit more. I also don't think we'll ever adopt PIN later.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 3:56 pm
  #12671  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 710
Originally Posted by tmiw
Is that by number of incidents or by total financial loss? Total financial loss to the banks from lost/stolen is a lot less than counterfeit (see page 28 of http://www.mapacific.com/files/42820...%20Outlook.pdf, though that only has estimated numbers for 2014).

There's some other interesting information in that document too. I prefer PIN but after reading that and some other stuff I understand the banks' rationale a bit more. I also don't think we'll ever adopt PIN later.
The stats I quoted were based on number of incidents. The report you found is great. Explains why the UK is so heavily weighted towards offline PIN. Also interesting that PINs are not a magic bullet - the bad guys just shifted to PIN capture and then steal the card.

This quote is particularly germane to all the recent posts here:

"One issuer reported that its international travel EMV pilot relied on chip and signature, and the increased use of No CVM addressed 95% of the prior rejection issues. No CVM will also be the preferred method in the United States for contactless transactions less than US$50."

You're right - after reading this report, I'm far less confident that we'll see many PIN preferred cards in the US. Hopefully there will continue to be boutique issuers.
glbltvlr is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 4:03 pm
  #12672  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by tmiw
Is that by number of incidents or by total financial loss? Total financial loss to the banks from lost/stolen is a lot less than counterfeit (see page 28 of http://www.mapacific.com/files/42820...%20Outlook.pdf, though that only has estimated numbers for 2014).

There's some other interesting information in that document too. I prefer PIN but after reading that and some other stuff I understand the banks' rationale a bit more. I also don't think we'll ever adopt PIN later.
Very interesting document. Mirrors a lot I've been saying (without documentation; I'm so perceptive it's scary). Found the part on no cvm thete totally in line with what I've said i.e. they are pushing foreign banks to begin accepting no cvm for small purchases (my big complaint about the self service machines in London for example). They also agree the chip in and of itself provides much of the additional protection rather than using pin as the primary cvm.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 4:29 pm
  #12673  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
I have confirmed via secure email a couple of noteworthy things about First Tech cards.

For the credit card, there is reportedly no fee from them besides the daily interest rate on cash advances from ATMs and ATM operator fees on credit cards. Thus, for travel abroad, the 1% ISA fee charged on their (and many CU) debit cards is waived on their credit card. If the same (or no) ATM operator fee is charged for the credit as the debit card, then a cash advance should have about the same interest (if the card is not paid off for 30 days) as the 1% ISA fee charged on their debit card when traveling abroad. Thus, full balance payoff the next day after a cash advance is made should cost only about .033% interest. Note that, because cash advances are paid off last, the whole current balance needs to be paid. Tests confirm that most local US ATM operators charge an ATM fee for credit, but not for debit card. I'm hoping that international doesn't for both. If true, then I could travel with 2 credit cards: First Tech as a credit and better than debit back up card along with perhaps Barclay 2.2% while the old rules are in place or Chase Amex Delta, and only a Schwab as primary debit card (no fees and full ATM rebates).

My next trip abroad is not until October, so someone with the First Tech credit card should report in on the cash advance behavior abroad before then. First Tech definitely will not reimburse ATM fees incurred abroad (only in US).

Sorry, a bit off topic:

The First Tech mobile smart phone (not Blackberry except perhaps newest model) and pc scanned, which provides check image smartphone doesn't, which image some banks charge to get a copy of, and most banks don't seem to support, daily deposit limit is $25k (no monthly limit), of which $3,500 is INSTANTLY available and the rest should be only a few days if not too much and not enough history. As usual with most banks, there is no way to tell for sure how long the rest of the funds will be held. This is much better than most banks I've checked who either only allow a few hundred dollars instantly or none for a few business days or more. I've successfully freed up deposit funds hold within a day by sending (via secure email) bank transaction history showing that check has cleared the originating bank, and having the $3,500 instantly handles 99% of my immediate needs. This is quicker than hand carrying a deposit to my Bank of the West bank, who puts a day or two hold on every deposited check, and can be quicker than the typical ACH of 2-3 days.
uds0 is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 5:26 pm
  #12674  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 297
Service CU V PAY

Got my V PAY card in the mail from Service CU (it comes from Germany, but since they have access to APO facilities, it's "domestic" mail.)

At first I couldn't get it to work in cardpeek. Eventually I discovered that it would read if I inserted the card all the way and then pulled it out the slightest bit. I have a SIIG JU-CR0012-S1 USB reader, and haven't had to do that with any other cards, so I wonder if maybe this one was manufactured slightly out of spec?

Anyway, the card has 6 AIDs on it! The first 3 are different girocard AIDs (domestic German debit network), then 2 are V PAY, and the last is GeldKarte (a PIN-less e-purse system used in Germany. Basically there are terminals where you put in your debit card, and with your PIN authorize up to EUR200 to be debited from your account and stored on the card in the e-purse. Then you can use funds in the e-purse at participating terminals, sans-PIN. I'm not too familiar with it as I haven't spent much time in Germany outside of airports; NL used to have a similar system called Chipknip that they just discontinued earlier in the year.)


Language preference for the card is German, then English. All of the printing on the card itself is in English except for the card number, account number, and expiry date labels, which are in German.

CVMs are:

girocard: Enciphered PIN online
V PAY: Enciphered PIN offline, Enciphered PIN online

I don't think CardPeek knows how to parse the information for GeldKarte because there were a bunch of errors in that section. Anyway, in practice I know it is NO CVM, only, because that's the whole point of GeldKarte.


Was surprised to see offline PIN capability for V PAY, since V PAY transactions by definition MUST authorize online, but then again there are countries (like the UK) that authorize most transactions online but still predominantly use offline PIN, so I guess it's not that unusual.


I was also surprised to find a magnetic stripe on the card; I presume it is only for use as a girocard since I know GeldKarte is chip-only, and I thought that V PAY was chip-only as well.

Also surprising that (to me) that the PAN is not printed on the card anywhere, but again, since VPAY can't be used in card-not-present fashion I guess there's no reason to put in on.


Still waiting for the PIN to come in the mail, should be any day.
bullfrog is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2015, 6:00 pm
  #12675  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
Originally Posted by bullfrog
Got my V PAY card in the mail from Service CU (it comes from Germany, but since they have access to APO facilities, it's "domestic" mail.)
Looks like their Visa Debit card has a 1% FTF, do they charge this on the V PAY card as well? I couldn't tell from the V PAY page on their web site.
Hawaiian717 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.