Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Old Sep 11, 2014, 9:33 am
  #6796  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Washington DC
Programs: AA Nothing, Marriott Gold
Posts: 581
Originally Posted by LoneTree
This supported by/for smartwatches would be amazing. My station is part of the pilot program too. The only problem during the pilot is when you have an entry gate supported by NFC but the exit station isn't.
Yea curious how that will work.
GoodOmens is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 11:10 am
  #6797  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 297
Interesting experience at MTY today.



Bought a bottle of water with my UNFCU Azure card, was duly prompted to enter PIN, but then also had to sign the slip.
bullfrog is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 11:49 am
  #6798  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by GoodOmens
Yea curious how that will work.
When San Francisco's BART (a similar entry/exit fare system as DC Metro uses) converted over to contactless cards (I believe it was called TransLink at the time instead of ClipperCards of today), the stations that didn't have them during the changeover phase used transit officers with portable contactless card readers.

LA Sheriff's Dept. deputies also carry similar portable contactless card readers (kinda looks like an old Nokia cell phone) on their random fare checks in the LA Metro system.

So I assume that's how that'll work for you guys as well.

Last edited by kebosabi; Sep 11, 2014 at 11:58 am
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 1:36 pm
  #6799  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The UK
Posts: 154
Originally Posted by bullfrog
Interesting experience at MTY today.



Bought a bottle of water with my UNFCU Azure card, was duly prompted to enter PIN, but then also had to sign the slip.
You had to sign the receipt that says PIN verified?
uklevi is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 1:48 pm
  #6800  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 297
Originally Posted by uklevi
You had to sign the receipt that says PIN verified?
Receipt didn't say anything on it about pin. But I definitely had to enter my pin on the pad.
bullfrog is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 4:25 pm
  #6801  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 45
Do you agree with the Times here? http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/up...abt=0002&abg=1

I don't. Maybe average Americans would, but maybe not us FTers.
FT777 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 4:36 pm
  #6802  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
The biggest retail chains have no plans to support NFC:

Best Buy Co. BBY +0.59% , for example, installed NFC-enabled scanners in many of its stores but switched them off in 2011 because the cost of supporting the platform was too high, the company spokesman said.

The retailer has no plans to change course following Apple's announcement.

In part, mobile payments have suffered from a classic chicken-and-egg situation. Smaller merchants in particular were reluctant to install the systemswhich can cost $300 to $500 per devicebecause few consumers were using them. Moreover, merchant fees for mobile-payment systems can be higher than for plastic cards, particularly for debit cards, Mr. Crone said.
In part, they plan to roll out a competing mobile payment system, which doesn't support credit cards:

Best Buy and Wal-Mart are instead backing a retailer-owned mobile technology group called Merchant Customer Exchange, which also counts Target Corp. among its members.

MCX's payment service requires only a software download and can be used on existing iPhones and Android devices, whereas Apple's is only for the latest generation handset.

The group announced the launch of a mobile wallet application called CurrentC, which it said will run as a pilot in certain cities before being rolled out nationally in 2015.

CurrentC said it will link with customers' checking accounts, retailer gift cards and select merchant-branded debit and credit accounts but doesn't currently sync with traditional credit cards. Unlike Apple Pay, CurrentC doesn't use NFC technology. Instead a retailer scans a digital QR code on its smartphone app.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/will-..._sections_tech
wco81 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 4:44 pm
  #6803  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by darthrevan1211
Do you agree with the Times here? http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/up...abt=0002&abg=1

I don't. Maybe average Americans would, but maybe not us FTers.
Nowadays, when you want to catch a glimpse of what the average American thinks to articles, the easiest way to do it is to read the comments section.

Most of them say this article is ridiculous, some of them quite knowledgeable about the Target breach, what's done abroad, EMV chips, contactless chips, Google Wallet, Coin, dynamic security, etc. etc.
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 4:54 pm
  #6804  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,486
Originally Posted by wco81
The biggest retail chains have no plans to support NFC
If they're so sure that NFC is a failure (which BTW is in most every Android phone built in the last couple of years), why do they think their app-based solution will succeed? The main problem seems to be that mobile payments currently take the same amount of time vs. swiping, if not longer. A watch based solution combined with wider availability would fix that issue, of course.
tmiw is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 5:10 pm
  #6805  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by tmiw
If they're so sure that NFC is a failure (which BTW is in most every Android phone built in the last couple of years), why do they think their app-based solution will succeed?
It's a crossroads of technology here, as always in the past (Betamax vs VHS, PC vs Mac, HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray, iOS vs Android, etc.). Today it's NFC vs. apps.

Worldwide, it's contactless that's the norm in fast-paced payments environments so likely that's going to be the defacto global standard.

Then again, this is Murica.
kebosabi is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 5:22 pm
  #6806  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
I'd be okay with QR codes for them to scan, assuming it's the same kind of one-time authorization code.

If this app. stores credit cards securely and don't pass off the numbers to the merchant.

But you know that won't be the case because a third-party app. won't be able to access the "Secure Element" chip that Apple is using to store the virtualized credit card tokens.

Sounds like they couldn't make deals with credit card companies, probably because they couldn't agree to fees and liability issues.

But most of the purchases at these stores are with credit cards or not? Maybe not at Wal Mart but can't imagine people are using mostly debit cards, cash or checks at BB.
wco81 is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 5:28 pm
  #6807  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,486
Originally Posted by wco81
I'd be okay with QR codes for them to scan, assuming it's the same kind of one-time authorization code.

If this app. stores credit cards securely and don't pass off the numbers to the merchant.

But you know that won't be the case because a third-party app. won't be able to access the "Secure Element" chip that Apple is using to store the virtualized credit card tokens.

Sounds like they couldn't make deals with credit card companies, probably because they couldn't agree to fees and liability issues.

But most of the purchases at these stores are with credit cards or not? Maybe not at Wal Mart but can't imagine people are using mostly debit cards, cash or checks at BB.
The WSJ article seemed to indicate that the app won't store credit cards at all, just loyalty/gift cards and coupons. In other words, another Passbook or Google Wallet clone sans card support.

Originally Posted by kebosabi
It's a crossroads of technology here, as always in the past (Betamax vs VHS, PC vs Mac, HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray, iOS vs Android, etc.). Today it's NFC vs. apps.

Worldwide, it's contactless that's the norm in fast-paced payments environments so likely that's going to be the defacto global standard.

Then again, this is Murica.
At least the mobile industry here learned from the CDMA/GSM fiasco early this century and have all chosen LTE for wireless technology this time around.
tmiw is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 9:32 pm
  #6808  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,486
Tonight I tried to use Google Wallet at Walgreens and the terminal asked me for a PIN (with bypass for Credit). It's never done that before. Botched Walgreens and/or Google software update? It approved the transaction when I chose Credit on the screen in any case.

EDIT: apparently the wallet PIN works if asked. It also only needs a data connection 1x/day, which I assume could be Wi-Fi since it doesn't mention any restrictions there. Good to know.

Last edited by tmiw; Sep 11, 2014 at 9:38 pm
tmiw is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2014, 10:06 pm
  #6809  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
What I find interesting is that Target isn't going to support Apple Pay in-store. They're a partner and they have NFC-capable readers (like Staples, they're currently disabled, but presumably Staples will enable them this month).
AllieKat is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2014, 12:53 am
  #6810  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The UK
Posts: 154
Originally Posted by bullfrog
Receipt didn't say anything on it about pin. But I definitely had to enter my pin on the pad.
There must have been a problem with the terminal and it reverted to signature as PIN as the CVM must've failed. I would try someplace else just to make sure there isn't a problem with your card. I don't think this is the case, but your PIN may have become locked. In this case, you'd need to visit an EMV enabled ATM with PIN services and look for the PIN unlock tool-just enter your PIN and it should do it all automatically. I don't think that is the case though, as you have to mess up entering your PIN so many times for that to happen. There probably just was an error in the merchant's terminal.
uklevi is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.