Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2014, 11:13 pm
  #5086  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,653
Originally Posted by bullfrog
Not too stupid (though while your average American memorizes the PIN for their one (or maybe two, tops?) ATM cards, will they really memorize 4, 5, or 6 PINs for all the cards they may have in their wallet?) The thing that terrifies a bank is that they don't want their card to be any harder to use than a competitor's.

I have 4 credit cards in my wallet. Each one of those banks wants their card to be my #1, go-to card for day-to-day transactions. Now let's say that these banks start issuing EMV (one of them, Wells Fargo, already has.) Now, each bank has to decide, should they prioritize C&P or C&S? If C&S, they know the end user experience is pretty much the same as before and I'll probably keep using my card just as much as before. But let's say I'm a less savvy user. Suppose the bank decides to send me a new card with C&P priority, and like many people in the swipe-card days, I just mindlessly discard the PIN mailer that comes a few days after the card, because I never take cash advances. Next time I go into the store and try to buy something, my card doesn't work. Annoyed, I use a different card. THAT is the scenario that banks want to avoid, because the loss of business costs them a lot more than the additional fraud they absorb due to the less effective customer verification that comes with signatures vs PINs.
Well my Chase Sapphire Preferred is currently my "go to" card. But what happens when I try to buy tickets at a terminal that only takes offline PIN, and there's a line of people 15 minutes long at the window with the agent? What happens if I try to buy gas at a gas station that only takes offline PIN? CSP goes back in the wallet, and out comes the USAA C&P card. Isn't THAT also a scenario that banks (namely Chase) would want to avoid? That's another reason I keep the USAA card. It's not worth waiting 15 minutes over 1 point per dollar and no foreign transaction fee. So if Chase doesn't wise up and put an offline PIN into the CSP, at least as second priority, then they're going to lose business to USAA.

Originally Posted by sdsearch
That indicates that it's an "offline" PIN card, which is the only kind of card that will work in some (unmanned) situations in France.

And it's not completely true that the PIN cannot be changed. What is true is that the PIN cannot be changed online or over the phone. The PIN can be changed only at an EMV-enabled ATM (or other kind of EMV-enabled machine at a bank), and the problem is that there are very few of these still in the US.
Any bank's EMV enabled ATM, or only your own bank's? If it's only your own bank's, then I'd likely have to go to San Antonio, to USAA's only branch.
STS-134 is online now  
Old Jun 23, 2014, 11:41 pm
  #5087  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,505
Originally Posted by STS-134
Well my Chase Sapphire Preferred is currently my "go to" card. But what happens when I try to buy tickets at a terminal that only takes offline PIN, and there's a line of people 15 minutes long at the window with the agent? What happens if I try to buy gas at a gas station that only takes offline PIN? CSP goes back in the wallet, and out comes the USAA C&P card. Isn't THAT also a scenario that banks (namely Chase) would want to avoid? That's another reason I keep the USAA card. It's not worth waiting 15 minutes over 1 point per dollar and no foreign transaction fee. So if Chase doesn't wise up and put an offline PIN into the CSP, at least as second priority, then they're going to lose business to USAA.
I'm totally guessing at Chase's supposed C&P plans, but I'm thinking they'll at least add offline PIN as second priority to their annual fee cards. If nothing else, the CSP will have the same functionality as the Arrival+ in that regard (assuming they're competing with each other).
tmiw is online now  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:01 am
  #5088  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
STS-134...

Enjoy using your USAA mc with its offline pin verification because when you get your renewal card, it won't have that feature any longer. USAA has dropped that innovation in favor of going the same direction as the rest of the American banks. Trust me. I'm in a verbal spat with them about this right now.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:01 am
  #5089  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,505
Some more insight as to why we're going C&S. In short, it boils down to the costs/effort not being worth the benefit, at least right now:

Conroy said that the American card issues have mostly gone for chip and signature which is less expensive and less complicated to issuers than chip and PIN, where the PIN has to be mailed separately and lost PIN card replacement becomes more complicated.
...
Lost/stolen cards, which is where PIN is most valuable, make up only 13 percent of U.S. fraud, she added, while cyber-criminals have shown with incidents like Target, Neiman Marcus and other card data thefts that they can do vast damage without possessing the actual card.
tmiw is online now  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:03 am
  #5090  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by tmiw
I'm totally guessing at Chase's supposed C&P plans, but I'm thinking they'll at least add offline PIN as second priority to their annual fee cards. If nothing else, the CSP will have the same functionality as the Arrival+ in that regard (assuming they're competing with each other).
I'm afraid you're dreaming. Chase will go the same directon as every other USA bank will go. Chip and signature with perhaps, and it's a big perhaps, offline pin back up. Whether the back up in the USA is going to exist or whether it's going to be online or offline seems to be the only question now.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:12 am
  #5091  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,505
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
I'm afraid you're dreaming. Chase will go the same directon as every other USA bank will go. Chip and signature with perhaps, and it's a big perhaps, offline pin back up. Whether the back up in the USA is going to exist or whether it's going to be online or offline seems to be the only question now.
Maybe, but they should keep in mind that the Internet is forever and they could lose customers by not at least making a symbolic gesture towards meeting the promise they made.
tmiw is online now  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:15 am
  #5092  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by tmiw
Some more insight as to why we're going C&S. In short, it boils down to the costs/effort not being worth the benefit, at least right now:
Best line in the article. Visa claiming that chip and signature is good enough for the American market while pushing chip and pin elsewhere.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:27 am
  #5093  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,653
Originally Posted by tmiw
Some more insight as to why we're going C&S. In short, it boils down to the costs/effort not being worth the benefit, at least right now:
Conroy said that the American card issues have mostly gone for chip and signature which is less expensive and less complicated to issuers than chip and PIN, where the PIN has to be mailed separately and lost PIN card replacement becomes more complicated.
...
Lost/stolen cards, which is where PIN is most valuable, make up only 13 percent of U.S. fraud, she added, while cyber-criminals have shown with incidents like Target, Neiman Marcus and other card data thefts that they can do vast damage without possessing the actual card.
I don't know why these stupid banks can't be innovative. Somewhere way back in this thread, I posted a suggestion about how to reduce fraud in both card present AND card not present transactions.

Basically, each user chooses a 4-digit PIN. In addition, each card has a button on it, and a display built into it. Pushing the button displays a 6-digit PIN, similar to the authentication tokens used to login to some websites http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_token

If the card is used in a store, the person must enter the 4-digit PIN (only). This verifies that the person using the card is the owner of the card. If the card is used to purchase something online, the person must enter the 4-digit PIN and the 6-digit PIN, 10 digits total. This verifies that the person using the card (1) is the card's owner and (2) has physical possession of the card at the time of purchase.
STS-134 is online now  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:32 am
  #5094  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,505
Originally Posted by STS-134
I don't know why these stupid banks can't be innovative. Somewhere way back in this thread, I posted a suggestion about how to reduce fraud in both card present AND card not present transactions.

Basically, each user chooses a 4-digit PIN. In addition, each card has a button on it, and a display built into it. Pushing the button displays a 6-digit PIN, similar to the authentication tokens used to login to some websites http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_token

If the card is used in a store, the person must enter the 4-digit PIN (only). This verifies that the person using the card is the owner of the card. If the card is used to purchase something online, the person must enter the 4-digit PIN and the 6-digit PIN, 10 digits total. This verifies that the person using the card (1) is the card's owner and (2) has physical possession of the card at the time of purchase.
A lot of our EMV transition is basically because the issuers, merchants and acquirers had no choice. If they could do it, we'd be using magstripe cards forever. Also, at least a few parties were hoping mobile payments or something else would take off before they had to bite the bullet on EMV.

As a result, we have this situation which may change in a couple of years or may not. My guess is that the "higher status" cards will be more likely to get some sort of PIN functionality in the future than the others.
tmiw is online now  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 12:43 am
  #5095  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
Originally Posted by STS-134
Basically, each user chooses a 4-digit PIN. In addition, each card has a button on it, and a display built into it. Pushing the button displays a 6-digit PIN, similar to the authentication tokens used to login to some websites http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_token
That's a very unnecessary way to complicate things....and even a small increase in the cost of the card will have a major impact with the current volumes.

There really is no need to very that the card is present when used online. That's not a way to get a good user experience. And there are plenty of other options, for instance what MasterCard is doing with a second authorization when used for online transactions.

It's all about reducing fraud for the least amount of effort and still providing a easy to use card. That's where PIN comes in... in a lot of countries something that was already accepted and in place, in the US not so much.
RTW1 is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 4:31 am
  #5096  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LAX/SFO/OAK
Posts: 218
Originally Posted by STS-134
I don't know why these stupid banks can't be innovative. Somewhere way back in this thread, I posted a suggestion about how to reduce fraud in both card present AND card not present transactions.

Basically, each user chooses a 4-digit PIN. In addition, each card has a button on it, and a display built into it. Pushing the button displays a 6-digit PIN, similar to the authentication tokens used to login to some websites http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_token

If the card is used in a store, the person must enter the 4-digit PIN (only). This verifies that the person using the card is the owner of the card. If the card is used to purchase something online, the person must enter the 4-digit PIN and the 6-digit PIN, 10 digits total. This verifies that the person using the card (1) is the card's owner and (2) has physical possession of the card at the time of purchase.
A very similar version of your idea is already being used by banks in other countries. Smart cards do exist with displays and multiple buttons on them. There are smart cards with built in displays for authentication token use. But you can take that idea a step further and build a PIN pad into the card too. You essentially get a self contained card that can fully interact with the user and authenticate the user. Keep in mind that this would be used for card not present transactions and internet shopping.

Here is a company that makes these cards and a small list of some banks that use them. The main problem is that there isn't a standard for these systems. And until the payment networks mandate these technologies, merchants won't adapt them.
WhatWhatTech is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 8:58 am
  #5097  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The UK
Posts: 154
Go figure America has to buck the trend and be different from almost everyone else. I'm not surprised.

I hope that Chase does hold up to their word and switch to C&P, but I'm at the point where I expect the worst and hope for the best.

I honestly don't know why, in the land of credit cards and debit cards, that there is only 1 issuer, UNFCU, that issues a C&P only card.
uklevi is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 9:52 am
  #5098  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: HHonors Gold, Marriott Lifetime Gold, IHG Gold, OZ*G, AA Gold, AS MVP
Posts: 1,874
Originally Posted by WhatWhatTech
A very similar version of your idea is already being used by banks in other countries. Smart cards do exist with displays and multiple buttons on them. There are smart cards with built in displays for authentication token use. But you can take that idea a step further and build a PIN pad into the card too. You essentially get a self contained card that can fully interact with the user and authenticate the user. Keep in mind that this would be used for card not present transactions and internet shopping.
This concept exists in China. I need to use a USB security device issued by my bank whenever I make a large purchase online with my Chinese credit or debit card. Plug it in, it needs an ActiveX control so I need to do everything in IE, merchant passes me to online banking, I log in, type the passcode to unlock my security token, the site passes the info to the security token where I confirm that the info matches what's displayed on the webpage and press OK on the token itself to confirm the purchase.

Also, just as an aside, it's not entirely surprising but BMO-Harris ATMs are EMV-enabled. I tried my Canadian BMO debit card at an ATM in ORD airport and it read the chip (which is starting to either rust or do some other thing that is slowly turning it a rust-like color, so I'll probably have to go get it replaced soon).
jamar is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 9:54 am
  #5099  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by uklevi
Go figure America has to buck the trend and be different from almost everyone else. I'm not surprised.

I hope that Chase does hold up to their word and switch to C&P, but I'm at the point where I expect the worst and hope for the best.

I honestly don't know why, in the land of credit cards and debit cards, that there is only 1 issuer, UNFCU, that issues a C&P only card.
I think several of us have hit on it just recently in the last two or three pages of the thread. Whether logical or not, bank losses due to fraud on card is present transactions is very minimal on a % basis (the last figures I saw was 13˘ on every $100 of profit), consumers have become more aware of it but in reality we still have limited (and in effect no) liability protections. There has also been talk of some sort of federal action. To forestall that, the banks feel they have to do something. They also may (note the word) be right that it is a pain to memorize three or four or more different pins.

Result...Chip and signature meets everybody's needs. It will cut down on fraud somewhat on card is present transactions (the emv chip being harder to counterfeit than a magnetic strip) although granted not as much as pin verification, it will work on other emv pos terminals throughout the world (then at least for now so will magnetic strip cards) and they can set up a pin backup (albeit online) and claim it can function as a chip and pin card. To me, the actions of USAA are the last nail in the coffin and at least to me demonstrate the direction this thing is going, at least for now.

The problems that have to be resolved are what happens at offline pin kiosks? Will these hybrid cards work? Not clear. And will it be made clear to merchants they must accept chip and signature cards or at least give the chip and signature cards the ability to switch to chip and pin even if the pos terminal accepts c&s but the merchant is adamant he or she will not allow the transaction to complete without a pin.

I really don't think anything else is going to happen in the near future.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jun 24, 2014, 10:38 am
  #5100  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by uklevi
I honestly don't know why, in the land of credit cards and debit cards, that there is only 1 issuer, UNFCU, that issues a C&P only card.
Sam's Club/GE Capital yesterday just started accepting applications for their new 5-3-1 Mastercard with EMV chip.

http://www.samsclub.com/sams/pagedet...reditMarketing

It has been reported that it's actually C&P because that's what MC prefers.

I have no way of telling for sure without cardpeek.
kebosabi is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.