Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airline Programs > Continental OnePass

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 6, 09, 2:46 am   #16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GRK
Programs: AAdvantage, OnePass Elite, Hotwire Express, Chairman - P3P Subcommittee
Posts: 11,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeSkywaiter View Post
I'm guessing the XJT "senior mammas" hold those trips
I haven't dared set foot, but some of the young cuties may be on others, and that goes for regionals in general
Steph3n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 2:50 am   #17
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hoboken, NJ; Pembroke Pines, FL
Programs: CO Plat, HH Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by familyflier View Post
Having done this flight a number of times on the ERJ, I personally prefer 12A on an ERJ to any coach seat on the 737.
I agree. As long as you fit in the seat (shoulders and legs), I think it beats coach on mainline with a direct neighbor.
__________________
My FlyerTalk Experience
lensman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 6:05 am   #18
I Voted
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Plat
Posts: 225
During a few months out of the year, Continental was doing all RJs. But for the most part of the year, they had the final flight out of IAH as a 737 and the second flight back to IAH was the 737 returning. I always booked those flights when I was traveling that route.

Hopefully you are just looking during the few months that the 737 does not operate on that route.
Wilco_FT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 11:15 am   #19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Former Houstonian; now in Atlanta, for better or worse
Programs: CO Plat, UA 1P, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, SPG Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite
Posts: 11,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steph3n View Post
and 735/E90 are right about the same in general speak.
Eh, not really. They may hold around the same number of passengers, but the 735 has far more overhead storage space, and a higher ceiling which makes it feel more spacious. Granted I'd take the E90's Y seats over the 735s in almost every situation, but there are some aspects of the small 737 that outweigh the large Embraer.
__________________
FlightMemory || Photos
2009 Upgrades — CO: 45/48 (Y/B-Ups: 10) || Goodbye NW, hello UA
ssullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 11:53 am   #20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GRK
Programs: AAdvantage, OnePass Elite, Hotwire Express, Chairman - P3P Subcommittee
Posts: 11,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssullivan View Post
Eh, not really. They may hold around the same number of passengers, but the 735 has far more overhead storage space, and a higher ceiling which makes it feel more spacious. Granted I'd take the E90's Y seats over the 735s in almost every situation, but there are some aspects of the small 737 that outweigh the large Embraer.
yes I meant in passengers.

The E series and upcoming C series will redefine the regional markets and are easily an improvement over the ERJ and CRJ of old, so I enjoy them in that capacity but I was just speaking from a 'fill the plane' pure numbers game of the 90ish-110ish passenger range.
Steph3n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 12:53 pm   #21
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: Continental Platnium, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 36
I read the title of this thread and just growned.

'nuff said.
Gregor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 12:57 pm   #22
I Voted
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Programs: US SP(GOOD RIDDANCE US), UA 3P, CO GE, MR Plat,
Posts: 1,097
I did 12A on a IAH-PIT ERJ back in september.....supposed to be a 2 1/2-3 hr flight but if the traffic is lite, then pilots can maneuver to cut off some time...We arrived into PIT an hour early because the traffic was not in our way (so the F/A said).
A sandwich with chips/cookie was served and it was a comfortable ride that flew by quickly....The F/A was quite entertaining....
I felt bad for her though--she had to do a PIT-EWR-OKC turn......EWR-OKC on the barbie jet---YUCK
__________________
US SP 6/3076 UA 3P 30/8483 CO GE 51/65086
I proudly support Art234 for Talkboard '09
USFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 2:50 pm   #23
I Voted
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SWO, LAS, SAT, IAH
Programs: CO-Plat, PC - Lifetime, Avis President's Club, Hilton-Gold, and Flying Culinarian
Posts: 2,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by USFreak View Post
I did 12A on a IAH-PIT ERJ back in september.....supposed to be a 2 1/2-3 hr flight but if the traffic is lite, then pilots can maneuver to cut off some time...We arrived into PIT an hour early because the traffic was not in our way (so the F/A said).
A sandwich with chips/cookie was served and it was a comfortable ride that flew by quickly....The F/A was quite entertaining....
I felt bad for her though--she had to do a PIT-EWR-OKC turn......EWR-OKC on the barbie jet---YUCK
I am currently using OKC or TUL as my airports and while I may need to catch a flight outta EWR I will always take the ride south before I go north! At least in the hopes of getting the upgrade on this route.
__________________
http://my.flightmemory.com/scott6067
CO Million Miles: 527,304 as of 11/05/09 and half way there now baby!!!
Scott6067 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 2:51 pm   #24
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central NJ (Usually EWR but sometimes PHL)
Programs: OnePass-Plat (8 years); Marriott-Plat; Hilton-Diamond (but dropping to nothing); National-Exec. Elit
Posts: 1,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by okcitychris View Post
EWR -OKC is "sweet" too. Usually a full plane. 3 1/2+ hours (depending on headwind) plus the inevitable 45 min traffic jam just to get in the air. The flight is so long the line for the restroom backs up to row 6.

If it weren't for 12A, I might prefer to drive.
I do EWR - STL - EWR a fair amount and have lately been booking EWR - DTW - STL for the same price. There may not be food service but I'll take F in a 35 year old DC9 over 3+ hours in an ERJ. Plus, the WorldPerks clubs at DTW are sweet.....good cookies
__________________
My pathetically domestic FlightMemory 2001-now (mostly business travel with personal included after 2007)
Steve GadFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 3:00 pm   #25
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Singapore, travelling all over SE Asia and ANZ
Programs: KrisFlyer Argentum, BA Bohemian Blue, Marriott Gold
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by arisaa View Post
I have a project where I need to fly IAH-YYZ weekly for a few months. The direct flights are 3+ hrs up and almost 4 hrs down. Am I crazy but wasn't COExpress supposed to be regional short-haul and not international main line? 4 hrs in an RJ145 just doesn't appeal to me. Furthermore, some flights are at meal time so what are we going to eat? A bag of pretzels just doesn't cut it.

If it matters that much to you that you fly in comfort, come here.
__________________
Conscience is a mother-in-law whose visit never ends...
NetJets Germany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 4:41 pm   #26
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 278
CO is forgetting what the RJ in ERJ stands for. Its regional jet! Not lets fly across the country in a sardine can jet. I'm one of the first people to defend RJ's on SHORT flights under 1 1/2 hours but RJ's on a four hour international flight, from the airlines hub, to a major destination is getting ridiculous.
M11Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 5:12 pm   #27
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hoboken, NJ; Pembroke Pines, FL
Programs: CO Plat, HH Diamond, SPG Plat
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott6067 View Post
I am currently using OKC or TUL as my airports and while I may need to catch a flight outta EWR I will always take the ride south before I go north! At least in the hopes of getting the upgrade on this route.
I've been flying EWR-OKC-EWR regularly since 2004. At first, I booked EWR-IAH-OKC as much as possible, but the EWR-IAH got progressively harder to come by, even as a plat, and the IAH-OKC route only has one daily 735 - and after a while it went to 8 seats in first. So I was faced with either:
1. 4 hours on an RJ EWR-OKC. Arrive in OKC around 6pm or 7pm
2. 4 hours on mainline EWR-IAH with a very low upgrade percentage even as a plat, a 1-2 hour connection in IAH, then another hour on an RJ or the one 735 with 70% upgrade percentage due to the small front cabin. Arrive in OKC around 9pm or 10pm.

I am happy to have the option of taking the nonstop on the RJ. It also means that delays out of EWR don't result in me getting stuck in IAH overnight.
__________________
My FlyerTalk Experience
lensman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 6, 09, 8:33 pm   #28
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: my front door to IAH gate in 60 mins
Programs: CO Platinum or Gold since the dark days, now MM
Posts: 95
He said it right

Quote:
Originally Posted by M11Stephen View Post
CO is forgetting what the RJ in ERJ stands for. Its regional jet! Not lets fly across the country in a sardine can jet. I'm one of the first people to defend RJ's on SHORT flights under 1 1/2 hours but RJ's on a four hour international flight, from the airlines hub, to a major destination is getting ridiculous.

succinct
arisaa is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:12 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0