TSA Installing Checkpoint CT Scanners
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,320
#47
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
It all depends upon the model number:
Interesting that L-3 and, by association, the TSA, view drugs as a "potential aviation threat[s]."
Interesting that L-3 and, by association, the TSA, view drugs as a "potential aviation threat[s]."
A. Sold their product to John Smith as a hand soap and
B. Sold their product to the Tsarnaev brothers as dish soap
That company holds the same ideology as the Tsarnaev brothers.
There are several types of equipment that use similar technologies for different purposes.
L3 makes a version of the tech that detects explosive compounds (TSA).
L3 makes a version of the tech that detects certain types of drugs (Usually for someone like the DEA or perhaps Customs).
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,099
TSA has only been searching for WEI since I got here. The only time we are associated with things like drugs are when they are discovered while trying to clear a possible threat item. If TSOs are actively searching for something other than WEI, then they are outside of the regulations and are wrong. Drugs are not our job, threats are. Regulations state that we are required to notify LEOs if those types of items are discovered while searching for possible threat items.
This phrase is exactly the same as saying that "because a soap company
A. Sold their product to John Smith as a hand soap and
B. Sold their product to the Tsarnaev brothers as dish soap
That company holds the same ideology as the Tsarnaev brothers.
There are several types of equipment that use similar technologies for different purposes.
L3 makes a version of the tech that detects explosive compounds (TSA).
L3 makes a version of the tech that detects certain types of drugs (Usually for someone like the DEA or perhaps Customs).
This phrase is exactly the same as saying that "because a soap company
A. Sold their product to John Smith as a hand soap and
B. Sold their product to the Tsarnaev brothers as dish soap
That company holds the same ideology as the Tsarnaev brothers.
There are several types of equipment that use similar technologies for different purposes.
L3 makes a version of the tech that detects explosive compounds (TSA).
L3 makes a version of the tech that detects certain types of drugs (Usually for someone like the DEA or perhaps Customs).
Are you suggesting that TSA screeners do not search for harmless items like water, orange juice, baby food, toothpaste, and any number of other harmless items that are not WEI?
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,320
Yes, they do have right to search water, juice, milks, baby food and a few other items, as well.
#51
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
I am suggesting nothing of the sort. TSA searches for WEI. The items you mention may be harmless, or they may not. TSA currently has regulations that prohibit the carrying of LGAs through the checkpoint - with some exceptions. You can argue that the LGA ban is silly or scientifically unsound, or just a general pain in the proverbial rear end - it will change nothing at this moment. TSA has deemed the LGA ban based upon science and a viable possible threat (a point of view I happen to agree with, based upon demonstrations I have seen).
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,099
I am suggesting nothing of the sort. TSA searches for WEI. The items you mention may be harmless, or they may not. TSA currently has regulations that prohibit the carrying of LGAs through the checkpoint - with some exceptions. You can argue that the LGA ban is silly or scientifically unsound, or just a general pain in the proverbial rear end - it will change nothing at this moment. TSA has deemed the LGA ban based upon science and a viable possible threat (a point of view I happen to agree with, based upon demonstrations I have seen).
TSA has only been searching for WEI since I got here.
#53
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
I have spent my entire 41-year professional career in the sciences and engineering. To assert that the LGA ban is based upon "science" is beyond absurd.
#54
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,099
#55
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
TSA has only been searching for WEI since I got here. The only time we are associated with things like drugs are when they are discovered while trying to clear a possible threat item. If TSOs are actively searching for something other than WEI, then they are outside of the regulations and are wrong. Drugs are not our job, threats are. Regulations state that we are required to notify LEOs if those types of items are discovered while searching for possible threat items.
With all due respect. perhaps you and some of your fellow workers have 'only
been searching for things like medical nitro pills when they are discovered while doing a random bag check.
Given that every screener has the final say, I don't think you are in a position to speak for TSA. You are only qualified to speak to your own limited personal experience at GSO and a few other airports, and even then, your experience is limited to what you have actually witnessed and is hardly a reliable guide to what takes place outside your line of sight.
There is no factual basis whatsoever for alleging that TSOs follow a standard policy, even regarding searching (or not) for money or drugs, including medically necessary legally prescribed drugs.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,099
(bolding mine)
With all due respect. perhaps you and some of your fellow workers have 'only
been searching for things like medical nitro pills when they are discovered while doing a random bag check.
Given that every screener has the final say, I don't think you are in a position to speak for TSA. You are only qualified to speak to your own limited personal experience at GSO and a few other airports, and even then, your experience is limited to what you have actually witnessed and is hardly a reliable guide to what takes place outside your line of sight.
There is no factual basis whatsoever for alleging that TSOs follow a standard policy, even regarding searching (or not) for money or drugs, including medically necessary legally prescribed drugs.
With all due respect. perhaps you and some of your fellow workers have 'only
been searching for things like medical nitro pills when they are discovered while doing a random bag check.
Given that every screener has the final say, I don't think you are in a position to speak for TSA. You are only qualified to speak to your own limited personal experience at GSO and a few other airports, and even then, your experience is limited to what you have actually witnessed and is hardly a reliable guide to what takes place outside your line of sight.
There is no factual basis whatsoever for alleging that TSOs follow a standard policy, even regarding searching (or not) for money or drugs, including medically necessary legally prescribed drugs.
#57
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
TSA's record is clear that TSA screeners are searching for far more than WEI. Cash, drugs which use to be listed in the weekly "look what we found" blog post, human trafficking, legal medicinal items, and other pilferable goodies. The only thing different recently is that TSA is keeping such reports out of the news.
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
TSA's record is clear that TSA screeners are searching for far more than WEI. Cash, drugs which use to be listed in the weekly "look what we found" blog post, human trafficking, legal medicinal items, and other pilferable goodies. The only thing different recently is that TSA is keeping such reports out of the news.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,099
TSA has estrablished that each FSD can implement stricter screening requirements - including looking for fake IDs and targeting minorities (EWR). TSA has also established that each screener is free to exercise his/her discretion to search for and confiscate anything s/he does not choose to allow.
#60
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,625
Moderator's Note: Topic Drift
Folks,
The subject of this thread is the introduction of three dimensional baggage scanners at TSA checkpoints.
Please refrain from remarking here about general TSA screening policies and practices which have nothing to do with this new equipment.
Thank you,
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
The subject of this thread is the introduction of three dimensional baggage scanners at TSA checkpoints.
Please refrain from remarking here about general TSA screening policies and practices which have nothing to do with this new equipment.
Thank you,
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator