Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2017, 8:20 pm
  #601  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,038
Originally Posted by GrayAnderson
I suspect you're realistically looking at an all-or-nothing approach on the ban: For example, are you really going to try and set up a re-screening station between Concourses D and E at ATL (and of course, what do you do with any cases where for operational reasons you get stuck with an international flight leaving from D)? Or take IAD...how in the world would you split screening between domestic and international outbound flights? Maybe you could split the checkpoints and route pax through a different screening site based on their flight, but then the "workaround" for a would-be attacker is simply to book a similarly-timed domestic flight on another airline and pass through security on that BP.
My point is that for US-EU flights, the infrastructure for screening for devices is already in place at the existing TSA checkpoints. All they have to do is reprint the posters with the newly banned items. This also has the benefit of implementing a ban for all domestic flights. A person brings a banned device to a checkpoint, they get turned away. Easy.

The only gotcha is for people flying to a non-banned country but hey, that's the price you pay when visiting the USA.
TomMM is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 8:25 pm
  #602  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,662
Originally Posted by MSY-MSP

8) limitation on the number of carry-ons to a single personal item. all electronics must be removed from the bag and individually proven to operate as intended, including functional ports, chargers, etc. Departure airports are permitted to limit the number of devices carried by passengers. However, in no instances shall that number be less than 2 devices, medical devices exempt. Worldwide standard on what is permitted in the hold.

If you ask me, 8 is probably close to where we may end up in the future.
You realize that it will never work, right? How in the world can you expect some TSA agent to determine that the USB-C port on my Nintendo Switch is operating properly?

All of the proposed standards will make air travel so much more unattractive than it is now that I suspect there would be no easier way to kick the world economy into recession. And yet again, the "security experts" do the terrorists jobs for them.

I will object to another bailout of airlines. Strongly.

Originally Posted by MSY-MSP
The US really doesn't want to impose the strong limitation on domestic flights right away as the infrastructure isn't up yet to handle this, but their hand may be forced.
Translation: "We know this is bull *bleep*, and when forced to try and sleep in the bed we're creating we don't want to."

Originally Posted by MSY-MSP
From what I have been told is that the EU will expect reciprocal restrictions on flights to the EU.
The fact that we're not already doing it means that they know it's bull.
JakiChan is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 8:38 pm
  #603  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by petaluma1
TSA creates perfect targets for domestic terrorists with the long lines and hundreds of people crowded into small spaces. No need to blow up a plane to create havoc with air travel.
BRU airport attack -- using bombs in luggage while on landside baggage carts showed that point you made in the second sentence above. Ban luggage carts at foreign airports? With US DHS/TSA, the ridiculous is always possible in their policies and practices.

The way to deal with the risk of contraband explosives on planes causing a security incident is to better detect explosives and thereby interdict them -- even on and for domestic US and US-originating flights. A ban on electronic devices of most sorts in hand luggage does nothing to help better detect bombs and thereby secure flights.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 8:45 pm
  #604  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
Originally Posted by GUWonder
BRU airport attack -- using bombs in luggage while on landside baggage carts showed that point you made in the second sentence above. Ban luggage carts at foreign airports? With US DHS/TSA, the ridiculous is always possible in their policies and practices.

The way to deal with the risk of contraband explosives on planes causing a security incident is to better detect explosives and thereby interdict them -- even on and for domestic US and US-originating flights. A ban on electronic devices of most sorts in hand luggage does nothing to help better detect bombs and thereby secure flights.
Puffers. Of course TSA demonstrated the agency is incapable of maintaining this type of device
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 8:56 pm
  #605  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,725
Originally Posted by wco81
It'll be interesting to see if flights have to divert during a TATL flight because of lithium battery fires in the cargo hold.
The unfortunate likelihood is that the flights won't survive long enough to divert. Or ditch. Uncontrolled fire in the cargo hold is probably the scariest thing possible on an aircraft, including scarier than a bomb which might be survivable depending on location and size. Uncontrolled fire will not be survivable unless it happens just a few minutes before landing.

I can't find the citation, but I believe there were 10-20 lithium battery fires in aircraft cabins in 2016 alone. Extinguished by pax/crew and no fatalities. The risk of explosives in laptops may be real, but the risk of these fires is way more real.

Every paranoid government bureaucrat considering this restriction should be required to read the complete accident reports for Swissair 111 and Valuejet 592. And preferably speak with families of the victims who are still grieving.

The risk of explosives in electronics is not new. We survived the Pan Am 103 era without knee-jerk over-reactive bans. I was a kid then, but I was paying attention and even doing a transatlantic round-trip in the weeks before and after. It's only in the last 16 years or so that the government (and by extension probably the people) have become so cowardly. The generation that won World War II would never have allowed it to come to this.
studentff is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 9:24 pm
  #606  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SoCal to the rest of the world...
Programs: AA EXP with lots of BA. UA 2MM Lifetime Plat - No longer chase hotel loyalty
Posts: 6,698
Originally Posted by JakiChan
You realize that it will never work, right? How in the world can you expect some TSA agent to determine that the USB-C port on my Nintendo Switch is operating properly?
Reality may be that electronics you want to take have to go through a similar check you do on a secondary. Prove they function and explosive trace detection (ETD) as is done to today only for secondary. Rolling that to all electronics would greatly slow down screening but the alternative of "no electronics" is likely a no starter for anything but an immediate ban period to get time to roll in more equipment for ETD testing
NickP 1K is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 9:27 pm
  #607  
KDS
 
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: Delta Diamond Medallion 1MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Car Executive Elite
Posts: 550
I travel with two laptops -- personal and work. Cannot access work network with personal laptop; won't put personal stuff on work laptop. Not going to be a good situation for work travel.
KDS is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 9:28 pm
  #608  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
Originally Posted by GUWonder
BRU airport attack -- using bombs in luggage while on landside baggage carts showed that point you made in the second sentence above. Ban luggage carts at foreign airports? With US DHS/TSA, the ridiculous is always possible in their policies and practices.

The way to deal with the risk of contraband explosives on planes causing a security incident is to better detect explosives and thereby interdict them -- even on and for domestic US and US-originating flights. A ban on electronic devices of most sorts in hand luggage does nothing to help better detect bombs and thereby secure flights.
If there's a case to be made for these draconian measures, they sure aren't making it to the public.

We're suppose to trust that the threat is non-significant, compared to other risks like lithium battery fires.
wco81 is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 9:52 pm
  #609  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...dent_chart.pdf

8 "incidents" in Jan/Feb 2017, 32 in 2016, 17 in 2015, 9 in 2014, 8 in 2013, 9 in 2012, 7 in 2011, 6 in 2010, 6 in 2009, 6 in 2008...but also, a number of these involved the device(s) being plugged in at the time or something being done to them (like the iPhone that broke when it got jammed in a seat) while some others weren't actually on an airplane (I see at least one or two 2016 incidents involving fires at the airport). Still, looking at the spike in the last two years (and considering the risk that there might end up being another "problem phone" or a "problem tablet" in the future) suggests that there's a good chance we'd be looking at somewhere in the range of a half-dozen baggage compartment fires per year.
GrayAnderson is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 9:57 pm
  #610  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by GrayAnderson
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...dent_chart.pdf

8 "incidents" in Jan/Feb 2017, 32 in 2016, 17 in 2015, 9 in 2014, 8 in 2013, 9 in 2012, 7 in 2011, 6 in 2010, 6 in 2009, 6 in 2008...but also, a number of these involved the device(s) being plugged in at the time or something being done to them (like the iPhone that broke when it got jammed in a seat) while some others weren't actually on an airplane (I see at least one or two 2016 incidents involving fires at the airport). Still, looking at the spike in the last two years (and considering the risk that there might end up being another "problem phone" or a "problem tablet" in the future) suggests that there's a good chance we'd be looking at somewhere in the range of a half-dozen baggage compartment fires per year.
The highly profitable US3 airline industry cartel kingpins could invest in fire/bomb-containing containers to reduce the odds of a problem arising from battery fires and explosions in the plane hold, but the US airlines seem to have other things to do with their money than spend it on that.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 10:00 pm
  #611  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NJ, USA
Programs: DL Skymiles
Posts: 50
There's a good chance that someone checks a device that's plugged into a portable charger. Now what? (Are portable chargers even allowed in checked luggage?)
mywanderlust is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 10:01 pm
  #612  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SoCal to the rest of the world...
Programs: AA EXP with lots of BA. UA 2MM Lifetime Plat - No longer chase hotel loyalty
Posts: 6,698
Originally Posted by mywanderlust
There's a good chance that someone checks a device that's plugged into a portable charger. Now what? (Are portable chargers even allowed in checked luggage?)
Not supposed to be but they likely do get check in.
NickP 1K is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 10:10 pm
  #613  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 580
Originally Posted by mywanderlust
There's a good chance that someone checks a device that's plugged into a portable charger. Now what? (Are portable chargers even allowed in checked luggage?)
I know that they are banned in some Asian countries. My colleague was flying from a Thailand airport and learned that three other passengers on the plane were paged and required to take their portable chargers out of their checked bag and to carry them on with them.

I was impressed with how thorough that the screening was, since the chargers were so small and they were able to spot them and ask them to be taken out of bags containing all sorts of other things.
guflyer is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 10:15 pm
  #614  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
I've been putting a rechargeable bluetooth speaker in my checked bags, because I already have a lot of electronics in my carryon bags.

It's about 5 inches by 3 inches by 2.5 inches.
wco81 is offline  
Old May 14, 2017, 10:19 pm
  #615  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,725
Originally Posted by GrayAnderson
Thanks for the link. I hope everyone looking at this ban in an official capacity has that file and reads it. To me this incident on 12/3/2016 is a fantastic representative of the problem:

While en route from Honolulu, HI to Atlanta, GA a fire was discovered in an
overhead bin near seat 3J. The crew extinguished the flames, which were
coming from a laptop. Three halon type fire extinguishers and two water type
fire extinguishers were used. The laptop then was placed in a containment
bag in a cooler with ice and monitored for the remainder of the flight. The flight continued to Atlanta and landed without further incident.
Laptop computer, in overhead bin and not in use, exhausted multiple fire extinguishers applied by crew directly to the fire before going out. IMO if that laptop had been in the hold there likely would have been 100% fatalities on a widebody aircraft (based on the "J" seat).

16 years of TSA/DHS paranoia has been bad enough, but if they go through with this ban they almost certainly will have innocent civilian American blood on their hands.
studentff is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.