Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

All Food and Electronics Larger than Cellphones out for Screening

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

All Food and Electronics Larger than Cellphones out for Screening

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2017, 5:23 am
  #196  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,083
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
I've heard yu can do this with brownies r chocolate cookies. The sort of snacks you might take t the airport with you in a very visible cntainer. And by "airport", I mean the sort f airport where TSA has a reputation fr cnfiscating snacks.

If you get my drift.
A TSA employee would be incredibly stupid to eat confiscated food items. Should be entertaining.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 7:21 am
  #197  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: RDU
Posts: 5,228
Originally Posted by STBCypriot
I'd spit on or stomp on any food before "voluntarily surrendering" it to TSA.
TSA probably has it in their possession by that point. Are you going to spit on them too?
zitsky is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 7:42 am
  #198  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by zitsky
TSA probably has it in their possession by that point. Are you going to spit on them too?
But don't we hear from somebody here that TSA always gives you a choice of what to do with contraband? In theory, you can reclaim the forbidden item, then spit on it and put it back in the bin.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 8:06 am
  #199  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: RDU
Posts: 5,228
Originally Posted by petaluma1
But don't we hear from somebody here that TSA always gives you a choice of what to do with contraband? In theory, you can reclaim the forbidden item, then spit on it and put it back in the bin.
You mean, mail it back to yourself, put in checked luggage etc? Often that's not a real choice, if you are short on time.
zitsky is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 9:16 am
  #200  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by zitsky
You mean, mail it back to yourself, put in checked luggage etc? Often that's not a real choice, if you are short on time.
Even if you have all the time in the world, how often are passengers actually given the choice?
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 6:58 pm
  #201  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,424
Does this continue to be a problem or has the TSA eased off its crackdown on food?

Last edited by richarddd; Sep 17, 2017 at 9:17 am
richarddd is offline  
Old Sep 17, 2017, 6:01 am
  #202  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by richarddd
Does this continue to be a problem or has the TSA eased off it's crackdown on food?
Yes, snacks (and books, etc.) continue to be a problem according to complaints on @TSA.

Here's one from yesterday:



It's at more airports than LEX, however.

Last edited by petaluma1; Sep 17, 2017 at 6:39 am
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2017, 12:41 am
  #203  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8
It seems this food screening is done more and more these last weeks.
http://khon2.com/2017/10/10/food-ins...olulu-airport/

https://www.disboards.com/threads/ne...lando.3641096/

I imagine the lines are growing in the airports!
Meril is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2017, 6:00 am
  #204  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Meril
It seems this food screening is done more and more these last weeks.
http://khon2.com/2017/10/10/food-ins...olulu-airport/

https://www.disboards.com/threads/ne...lando.3641096/

I imagine the lines are growing in the airports!
Line are growing and so, it seems, are the number of people missing flights. Reports are beginning to surface of 2 hour waits in security lines once again.

Screening of electronics is apparently just getting started, foodstuffs are in full gear and many airports still seem to be checking books, magazines, etc.

It is beginning to appear that this nonsense is not a security issue (like so many things TSA) but rather an attempt to force people into applying for PreCheck.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2017, 11:14 am
  #205  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,162
The idiocy reported in the Disney blog linked above is beyond belief. It is congressional budget season -- passing appropriations bills for FY 2018 and preparing the FY 2019 president's budget. It's a great time for the TSA to create chaos: more money for clerks & the spiffy new x-ray machines. Also, I agree with Petaluma's assertion that it's a way to strong-arm more people into paying for ExtortionCheck.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2017, 7:46 am
  #206  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Explosives in peanut butter sandwiches courtesy of TSA

After seeing a soft drink can with a false bottom meant to hide valuables, Aguilera began looking around for other hiding places disguised as food. The fake sandwich opens like a wallet, with zippered compartments in each slice of bread designed to hide cash or credit cards. Aguilera puts a piece of sheet explosives and a detonator in one slice and sends it through security.

“In a sandwich bag, it looks like a sandwich going through,” he said.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/loc...177427581.html

When Aguilera was asked how often these test explosives get through, TSA spokesman Mike England leaned in and said, “We can’t talk about test results. That’s classified.”
You can't talk about the results because TSA failed 95% of the time?
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2017, 8:44 am
  #207  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,083
Originally Posted by petaluma1
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/loc...177427581.html



You can't talk about the results because TSA failed 95% of the time?
I don't see the issue given this statement in the referenced article:

Aguilera said X-ray screeners can pick up hidden explosives in a carry-on bag, but they also look for items that have been altered.
Also, I thought small electronics like E book readers, tablets, and other smaller type devices could remain in carry on. This statement from the article disagrees with my belief and the TSA.Gov website for screening is so thin on substance that it is less than helpful.

▪ Take any electronic items larger than a cellphone out of your bags, including tablets.

Last edited by Boggie Dog; Oct 19, 2017 at 8:55 am Reason: correction
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Oct 19, 2017, 12:10 pm
  #208  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I don't see the issue given this statement in the referenced article:

Aguilera said X-ray screeners can pick up hidden explosives in a carry-on bag, but they also look for items that have been altered.
Also, I thought small electronics like E book readers, tablets, and other smaller type devices could remain in carry on. This statement from the article disagrees with my belief and the TSA.Gov website for screening is so thin on substance that it is less than helpful.
Not sure I understand what you mean in the sentence I bolded.

From what I am reading on @TSA, everything larger than a cell phone comes out, food too and often reading materials.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2017, 12:33 pm
  #209  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,083
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Not sure I understand what you mean in the sentence I bolded.

From what I am reading on @TSA, everything larger than a cell phone comes out, food too and often reading materials.
I was being a bit to brief in my response.

The TSA spokesperson quoted in the article states that explosives are visible in the xray. So hiding sheet explosive in a fake (or real) sandwich should not defeat TSA screeners. Nor should any other device be a concern so why the requirement to remove these things? Is the TSA spokesperson not telling the truth or is the very high target miss rate of TSA screeners caused by something else like inattention to their duties?

Things just don't add up for me.

And how much damage could a pane of sheet explosive the size of a sandwich cause? The power of an explosive is generally related to being contained. Example, gun power just poured on the ground and torched makes a quick flash of fire and smoke but no explosion. Put that same amount of gun powder in a tight container (pipe bomb) with a fuse and now you have a small bomb.

Basically I'm saying that TSA is tilting at windmills.
petaluma1 likes this.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Oct 19, 2017, 5:28 pm
  #210  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SW WA
Posts: 3,884
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog

Also, I thought small electronics like E book readers, tablets, and other smaller type devices could remain in carry on.
Recent data points from BUR, BOS, LAX and PDX - all electronics (including kindles, tablets, etc.) must be out of carry-ons, and in separate bins. The line at BUR was ridiculous because each person had 3-5 bins.
Buster is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.