TSA denies screening for young boy with pacemaker
#46
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 201
Yet the screeners still moved their focus from the person who did alarm to a person who did not alarm. I don't see how that meets the "Risk Based Screening" objective. If the kid was a mule then wouldn't the mother take extra precaution to not contaminate herself?
The final question, what percentage of 9 year old boys, with flights originating in the U.S., are found to be carrying weapons of any sort?
Real "Risk Based Screening" would have an answer for that question
The final question, what percentage of 9 year old boys, with flights originating in the U.S., are found to be carrying weapons of any sort?
Real "Risk Based Screening" would have an answer for that question
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
He's a heart patient. Nitroglycerin medication comes to mind.
You answered your own question. The percentage of terrorist 9 year olds on American soil is pretty slim. I'm pretty sure that the Israelis wouldn't have ignored him if a similar situation occurred at one of their own checkpoints. If there wasn't risk screening, the boy would have been frisked. Is that what you'd rather have?
Pat downs based on the results of ETD should be banned, at least until a reliable device is reprogrammed or built that only alarms on true threats. Medical Nitro, lawn fertilizer residue on shoes, Clear Care contact lens solutions, hand lotions, and such other items are not security threats.
Doing a pat down on some person because another individual alarmed is senseless and the practice should be ended.
TSA is focused on doing the wrong things.
#48
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Bob Burns and the Blog have spoken.
http://blog.tsa.gov/2016/08/tsa-myth...-year-old.html
If screening of these two was unremarkable as the blog seems to indicate, why were they escorted to their flight by AA personnel?
http://blog.tsa.gov/2016/08/tsa-myth...-year-old.html
After screening, the mother and her son were escorted to their gate by American Airlines personnel, where they boarded and completed their scheduled flight.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
TSA's piece says,
"There have been some reports that a nine-year-old child with a pacemaker was prevented from flying home because TSA thought his pacemaker was a bomb."
I don't think being prevented from flying was the complaint. TSA once again just tries to muddy the water instead of having an honest discussion of what actually happened.
"There have been some reports that a nine-year-old child with a pacemaker was prevented from flying home because TSA thought his pacemaker was a bomb."
I don't think being prevented from flying was the complaint. TSA once again just tries to muddy the water instead of having an honest discussion of what actually happened.
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Explosive residue is sticky. If the kid was traveling with or was handling explosives, it would have been everywhere. Testing the bag and traveling companion would have resulted in even more alarms and more scrutiny.
Walking on fertilizer or working in a gunpowder-heavy industry might get you a false alarm for nitrates, and using certain colognes or hand lotions might get you another for nitroglycerin. Should the solution be eliminating all those tests altogether? Just because someone with ashy elbows wants to pre-lube before security instead of after?
Kind of ironic to complain about them "ignoring the threat", (a 9 y/o kid), as that's a direct result of other complaints. Everyone was up in arms about TSA screening grannies and children. Now they have alternatives, and people are still complaining.
It really doesn't matter what TSA does, so long as the rules only apply to everyone else.
Walking on fertilizer or working in a gunpowder-heavy industry might get you a false alarm for nitrates, and using certain colognes or hand lotions might get you another for nitroglycerin. Should the solution be eliminating all those tests altogether? Just because someone with ashy elbows wants to pre-lube before security instead of after?
Kind of ironic to complain about them "ignoring the threat", (a 9 y/o kid), as that's a direct result of other complaints. Everyone was up in arms about TSA screening grannies and children. Now they have alternatives, and people are still complaining.
It really doesn't matter what TSA does, so long as the rules only apply to everyone else.
ETD alarm = grope somebody makes no sense at all, yet that's the way it seems to work.
We have run into this once--ETD (contaminated patch, they couldn't get a reaction from anything in it) on my wife's rollaboard. We had already identified it as hers and it contained some clearly feminine things. Yet we were asked who was to get the grope.
Either check the person whose bag it is or check everyone if the ownership isn't clear. Don't check a volunteer, that makes the whole thing worthless.
#51
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
http://theantimedia.org/agents-terrorize-boy-pacemaker/
Witness Gwenette Bradley:
That's a great way to demean someone and I suspect just like the swarming, it's something taught by TSA as a means of control.
~~
ETA: Perhaps video is needed of this incident, or a copy of TSA's report. The Blog article makes it sound like their transit of the checkpoint took only a brief time whereas mom says it took over an hour.
Witness Gwenette Bradley:
“It was very traumatic for her, and I really felt bad for her,” she said. Bradley observed that Bergstrom had provided paperwork to the TSA agents, but even as she presented the necessary documents, the authorities showed her no sympathy. Rather, she says, they encircled her, refused to speak directly to her, and whispered to each other. “They all just talked among themselves like she wasn’t there. And I thought what in the world would possess them to do that? It just wasn’t necessary at all.”
~~
ETA: Perhaps video is needed of this incident, or a copy of TSA's report. The Blog article makes it sound like their transit of the checkpoint took only a brief time whereas mom says it took over an hour.
Last edited by petaluma1; Aug 25, 2016 at 6:30 am
#52
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
We are complaining because the procedure makes no sense.
ETD alarm = grope somebody makes no sense at all, yet that's the way it seems to work.
We have run into this once--ETD (contaminated patch, they couldn't get a reaction from anything in it) on my wife's rollaboard. We had already identified it as hers and it contained some clearly feminine things. Yet we were asked who was to get the grope.
Either check the person whose bag it is or check everyone if the ownership isn't clear. Don't check a volunteer, that makes the whole thing worthless.
ETD alarm = grope somebody makes no sense at all, yet that's the way it seems to work.
We have run into this once--ETD (contaminated patch, they couldn't get a reaction from anything in it) on my wife's rollaboard. We had already identified it as hers and it contained some clearly feminine things. Yet we were asked who was to get the grope.
Either check the person whose bag it is or check everyone if the ownership isn't clear. Don't check a volunteer, that makes the whole thing worthless.
#53
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Inside scoop from someone that works there:
Son bypasses metal detector because of his condition, and was offered the same specialized screening they're used to. (5-second hand test)
Machine alarms on test, and the mom and all their bags had to get extra screening. (nothing extra is done to the son)
Mom gets pissed off that she has to get pat down, and refuses to cooperate. Yells and screams that this isn't what happens at other airports, etc.
Mom's behavior gets the son upset, and he starts crying. Tells his mom to stop.
TSA calls for backup as tantrum continues, in the form of managers, police, etc.
Mom eventually complies and vows revenge.
Son bypasses metal detector because of his condition, and was offered the same specialized screening they're used to. (5-second hand test)
Machine alarms on test, and the mom and all their bags had to get extra screening. (nothing extra is done to the son)
Mom gets pissed off that she has to get pat down, and refuses to cooperate. Yells and screams that this isn't what happens at other airports, etc.
Mom's behavior gets the son upset, and he starts crying. Tells his mom to stop.
TSA calls for backup as tantrum continues, in the form of managers, police, etc.
Mom eventually complies and vows revenge.
Also plausible is the idea that when the kid's ETD alarmed, the TSOs involved immediately escalated to a full hand search of all bags and a mandatory pat-down of at least one adult in the party (since the party had only one adult, she was elected).
And most plausible was that the TSOs involved have such poor training regarding the care and proper use of the ETD machine and its associated paraphernalia, and so little understanding of the concepts of residue transfer and cross-contaimination, that nobody ever had the thought to re-test the kid with different TSO with fresh gloves on a different machine to see if they could reproduce the alarm, or if it was a one-time glitch caused by dirty gloves, contaminated swabs, or an out-of-calibration machine.
Explosive residue is sticky. If the kid was traveling with or was handling explosives, it would have been everywhere. Testing the bag and traveling companion would have resulted in even more alarms and more scrutiny.
Walking on fertilizer or working in a gunpowder-heavy industry might get you a false alarm for nitrates, and using certain colognes or hand lotions might get you another for nitroglycerin. Should the solution be eliminating all those tests altogether? Just because someone with ashy elbows wants to pre-lube before security instead of after?
Kind of ironic to complain about them "ignoring the threat", (a 9 y/o kid), as that's a direct result of other complaints. Everyone was up in arms about TSA screening grannies and children. Now they have alternatives, and people are still complaining.
It really doesn't matter what TSA does, so long as the rules only apply to everyone else.
Walking on fertilizer or working in a gunpowder-heavy industry might get you a false alarm for nitrates, and using certain colognes or hand lotions might get you another for nitroglycerin. Should the solution be eliminating all those tests altogether? Just because someone with ashy elbows wants to pre-lube before security instead of after?
Kind of ironic to complain about them "ignoring the threat", (a 9 y/o kid), as that's a direct result of other complaints. Everyone was up in arms about TSA screening grannies and children. Now they have alternatives, and people are still complaining.
It really doesn't matter what TSA does, so long as the rules only apply to everyone else.
It proves that those common items are made of things that the machine was programmed to look for. Maybe future technology will allow for better programming.
He's a heart patient. Nitroglycerin medication comes to mind.
You answered your own question. The percentage of terrorist 9 year olds on American soil is pretty slim. I'm pretty sure that the Israelis wouldn't have ignored him if a similar situation occurred at one of their own checkpoints. If there wasn't risk screening, the boy would have been frisked. Is that what you'd rather have?
He's a heart patient. Nitroglycerin medication comes to mind.
You answered your own question. The percentage of terrorist 9 year olds on American soil is pretty slim. I'm pretty sure that the Israelis wouldn't have ignored him if a similar situation occurred at one of their own checkpoints. If there wasn't risk screening, the boy would have been frisked. Is that what you'd rather have?
#54
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 396
And yet, TSA, within it published guidelines, could have easily spoken to the mother and child about using the AIT. It is apparent from the mothers facebook post that they are amenable to using the "other machine" instead of the metal detector.
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
And most plausible was that the TSOs involved have such poor training regarding the care and proper use of the ETD machine and its associated paraphernalia, and so little understanding of the concepts of residue transfer and cross-contaimination, that nobody ever had the thought to re-test the kid with different TSO with fresh gloves on a different machine to see if they could reproduce the alarm, or if it was a one-time glitch caused by dirty gloves, contaminated swabs, or an out-of-calibration machine.
The only 100% way to use a ETD swab would be to remove it from the storage container, test the new swab before use, swab the item, then test for contamination.
Even then the target envelope is too wide to render useful results.
#56
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 948
I have witnessed a screener taking a swab that was lying on the table where the ETD was located then using that swap to test an item. No idea how long it had been laying on top of the table or how many testing cycles it had been through.
The only 100% way to use a ETD swab would be to remove it from the storage container, test the new swab before use, swab the item, then test for contamination.
Even then the target envelope is too wide to render useful results.
The only 100% way to use a ETD swab would be to remove it from the storage container, test the new swab before use, swab the item, then test for contamination.
Even then the target envelope is too wide to render useful results.
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
Don't think this link has been posted here. This article goes into great detail as to what happened at PHX and this family and is a good read.
http://theantimedia.org/agents-terrorize-boy-pacemaker/
Eventually, Bergstrom was told that all of her items had to be screened because her bags had triggered the security alarm during screening, an assertion Bergstrom disputes.
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
http://theantimedia.org/agents-terrorize-boy-pacemaker/
Witness Gwenette Bradley:
That's a great way to demean someone and I suspect just like the swarming, it's something taught by TSA as a means of control.
~~
ETA: Perhaps video is needed of this incident, or a copy of TSA's report. The Blog article makes it sound like their transit of the checkpoint took only a brief time whereas mom says it took over an hour.
Witness Gwenette Bradley:
That's a great way to demean someone and I suspect just like the swarming, it's something taught by TSA as a means of control.
~~
ETA: Perhaps video is needed of this incident, or a copy of TSA's report. The Blog article makes it sound like their transit of the checkpoint took only a brief time whereas mom says it took over an hour.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
If that airports FSD was on scene and allowed these events to happen then the first step should be the immediate dismissal of that FSD.
Then start working down the Chain of Command and start chopping out dead wood as needed.
Then start working down the Chain of Command and start chopping out dead wood as needed.
#60
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 948
If you have opinions on that you should probably contact your senator or congressman. I have a feeling not many would have the position "lets increase the amount of weapons smuggled through the TSA to reduce wait times" wouldn't fare well come election time.
And that's what it boils down to. The TSOs are public employees, if they have more work that means longer wait times for you and doesn't make any difference for them.