Stupid TSA security superstitions at the airport
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,057
Stupid TSA security superstitions at the airport
Going to start a rant on what I perceive to be baseless and useless protocol that TSA and airline employees practice.
Backscatter scanner. The whole reason for its development and deployment was to be faster and better than metal detectors. When it was first launched, you leave your clothing on including the belt. But in recent years I am seeing TSA <redacted by moderator> asking me to remove my belt when it has never been an issue for years. It is not a bloody metal detector <redacted by moderator>!
The other thing that drive me nuts is employees, not security checking my boarding pass before I get in line. It used to be that these people would help with direction and other misc stuff. But now they want to check boarding pass too? I know where I am going, and it is the TSA that will check my boarding pass! So why are these <redacted by moderator> wasting my time? Some <redacted by moderator> will even block my path if I refuse to show boarding pass. Who the fark do they think they are?
The last peeve is YMMV depending on airport. Because of stupid airport designs, sometimes the lounge I want to visit is in another part and I need to clear security at another terminal. Some airport don't allow this because you are in the 'wrong' terminal. If the airport was dumb enough not to connect all gates after security, we should not be penalized for their incompetence.
So what other mindless protocol have you seen at the airport?
Backscatter scanner. The whole reason for its development and deployment was to be faster and better than metal detectors. When it was first launched, you leave your clothing on including the belt. But in recent years I am seeing TSA <redacted by moderator> asking me to remove my belt when it has never been an issue for years. It is not a bloody metal detector <redacted by moderator>!
The other thing that drive me nuts is employees, not security checking my boarding pass before I get in line. It used to be that these people would help with direction and other misc stuff. But now they want to check boarding pass too? I know where I am going, and it is the TSA that will check my boarding pass! So why are these <redacted by moderator> wasting my time? Some <redacted by moderator> will even block my path if I refuse to show boarding pass. Who the fark do they think they are?
The last peeve is YMMV depending on airport. Because of stupid airport designs, sometimes the lounge I want to visit is in another part and I need to clear security at another terminal. Some airport don't allow this because you are in the 'wrong' terminal. If the airport was dumb enough not to connect all gates after security, we should not be penalized for their incompetence.
So what other mindless protocol have you seen at the airport?
Last edited by TWA884; Jul 17, 2016 at 8:27 am Reason: Terms not used in this forum. Please refer to sticky thread.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,263
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,079
OP, you do know that there are no Backscatter scanners in use currently, right?
I don't think there was ever a claim that Whole Body Imagers, Backscatter or MMW, were faster than Walk Thru Metal Detectors. The idea was to find non-metallic threat items. Regardless, WBI's are flawed all the same.
I don't think there was ever a claim that Whole Body Imagers, Backscatter or MMW, were faster than Walk Thru Metal Detectors. The idea was to find non-metallic threat items. Regardless, WBI's are flawed all the same.
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,629
I'll have to disagree on this, although it's not worth trying to dig up cites.
IIRC, in the early days, pax were assured that the NoS would be as fast as the WTMD, and for many pax (those with metal implants that set off the WTMD), the process would be even faster.
There might have been some truth to that. A human operator manning the BSX wasn't likely to flag too many bald heads, faces, weaves/fros or bare arms for resolution gropes.
IIRC, in the early days, pax were assured that the NoS would be as fast as the WTMD, and for many pax (those with metal implants that set off the WTMD), the process would be even faster.
There might have been some truth to that. A human operator manning the BSX wasn't likely to flag too many bald heads, faces, weaves/fros or bare arms for resolution gropes.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,079
I'll have to disagree on this, although it's not worth trying to dig up cites.
IIRC, in the early days, pax were assured that the NoS would be as fast as the WTMD, and for many pax (those with metal implants that set off the WTMD), the process would be even faster.
There might have been some truth to that. A human operator manning the BSX wasn't likely to flag too many bald heads, faces, weaves/fros or bare arms for resolution gropes.
IIRC, in the early days, pax were assured that the NoS would be as fast as the WTMD, and for many pax (those with metal implants that set off the WTMD), the process would be even faster.
There might have been some truth to that. A human operator manning the BSX wasn't likely to flag too many bald heads, faces, weaves/fros or bare arms for resolution gropes.
I don't recall TSA leaning on speed for the devices.
Last edited by Boggie Dog; Jul 14, 2016 at 5:37 pm
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,079
Neffy learned a lesson about focusing on one aspect over all others. It's a balancing act but one that must be done to maintain the public's belief in Security Theater.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Many reports this week about screeners using their fingers, not the palm or back of hand, during genital gropes.
#11
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,331
Going to start a rant on what I perceive to be baseless and useless protocol that TSA and airline employees practice.
Backscatter scanner. The whole reason for its development and deployment was to be faster and better than metal detectors. When it was first launched, you leave your clothing on including the belt. But in recent years I am seeing TSA <redacted by moderator> asking me to remove my belt when it has never been an issue for years. It is not a bloody metal detector <redacted by moderator>!
The other thing that drive me nuts is employees, not security checking my boarding pass before I get in line. It used to be that these people would help with direction and other misc stuff. But now they want to check boarding pass too? I know where I am going, and it is the TSA that will check my boarding pass! So why are these <redacted by moderator> wasting my time? Some <redacted by moderator> will even block my path if I refuse to show boarding pass. Who the fark do they think they are?
The last peeve is YMMV depending on airport. Because of stupid airport designs, sometimes the lounge I want to visit is in another part and I need to clear security at another terminal. Some airport don't allow this because you are in the 'wrong' terminal. If the airport was dumb enough not to connect all gates after security, we should not be penalized for their incompetence.
So what other mindless protocol have you seen at the airport?
Backscatter scanner. The whole reason for its development and deployment was to be faster and better than metal detectors. When it was first launched, you leave your clothing on including the belt. But in recent years I am seeing TSA <redacted by moderator> asking me to remove my belt when it has never been an issue for years. It is not a bloody metal detector <redacted by moderator>!
The other thing that drive me nuts is employees, not security checking my boarding pass before I get in line. It used to be that these people would help with direction and other misc stuff. But now they want to check boarding pass too? I know where I am going, and it is the TSA that will check my boarding pass! So why are these <redacted by moderator> wasting my time? Some <redacted by moderator> will even block my path if I refuse to show boarding pass. Who the fark do they think they are?
The last peeve is YMMV depending on airport. Because of stupid airport designs, sometimes the lounge I want to visit is in another part and I need to clear security at another terminal. Some airport don't allow this because you are in the 'wrong' terminal. If the airport was dumb enough not to connect all gates after security, we should not be penalized for their incompetence.
So what other mindless protocol have you seen at the airport?
WBI no longer uses human operators looking at nude pictures of the suspect, er, body, er, traveler. Today, to address privacy concerns, the WBI uses an Automated Target Recognition software to analyze the scan returns, rather than creating an image. But the ATR is rudimentary, at best. It alarms on thick clothing, folds of cloth, cargo pockets, folds of human flash on obese people, and even sweat. This is why you have to take you belt off - because the ATR would alarm on any and every belt.
WBI isn't really "mindless" per se, and it's far from a "superstition", but like everything else TSA does, they implemented it very poorly based on bad information from the people selling it, they use it totally wrong, and the rank and file barely understand how it works. Hence, it doesn't work at all to do the job it was bought to do.
I'll have to disagree on this, although it's not worth trying to dig up cites.
IIRC, in the early days, pax were assured that the NoS would be as fast as the WTMD, and for many pax (those with metal implants that set off the WTMD), the process would be even faster.
There might have been some truth to that. A human operator manning the BSX wasn't likely to flag too many bald heads, faces, weaves/fros or bare arms for resolution gropes.
IIRC, in the early days, pax were assured that the NoS would be as fast as the WTMD, and for many pax (those with metal implants that set off the WTMD), the process would be even faster.
There might have been some truth to that. A human operator manning the BSX wasn't likely to flag too many bald heads, faces, weaves/fros or bare arms for resolution gropes.
Last edited by TWA884; Jul 17, 2016 at 8:31 am Reason: Conform to moderator's edit of quoted post
#12
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Going to start a rant on what I perceive to be baseless and useless protocol that TSA and airline employees practice.
Backscatter scanner. The whole reason for its development and deployment was to be faster and better than metal detectors. When it was first launched, you leave your clothing on including the belt. But in recent years I am seeing TSA <redacted by moderator> asking me to remove my belt when it has never been an issue for years. It is not a bloody metal detector <redacted by moderator>!
The other thing that drive me nuts is employees, not security checking my boarding pass before I get in line. It used to be that these people would help with direction and other misc stuff. But now they want to check boarding pass too? I know where I am going, and it is the TSA that will check my boarding pass! So why are these <redacted by moderator> wasting my time? Some <redacted by moderator> will even block my path if I refuse to show boarding pass. Who the fark do they think they are?
The last peeve is YMMV depending on airport. Because of stupid airport designs, sometimes the lounge I want to visit is in another part and I need to clear security at another terminal. Some airport don't allow this because you are in the 'wrong' terminal. If the airport was dumb enough not to connect all gates after security, we should not be penalized for their incompetence.
So what other mindless protocol have you seen at the airport?
Backscatter scanner. The whole reason for its development and deployment was to be faster and better than metal detectors. When it was first launched, you leave your clothing on including the belt. But in recent years I am seeing TSA <redacted by moderator> asking me to remove my belt when it has never been an issue for years. It is not a bloody metal detector <redacted by moderator>!
The other thing that drive me nuts is employees, not security checking my boarding pass before I get in line. It used to be that these people would help with direction and other misc stuff. But now they want to check boarding pass too? I know where I am going, and it is the TSA that will check my boarding pass! So why are these <redacted by moderator> wasting my time? Some <redacted by moderator> will even block my path if I refuse to show boarding pass. Who the fark do they think they are?
The last peeve is YMMV depending on airport. Because of stupid airport designs, sometimes the lounge I want to visit is in another part and I need to clear security at another terminal. Some airport don't allow this because you are in the 'wrong' terminal. If the airport was dumb enough not to connect all gates after security, we should not be penalized for their incompetence.
So what other mindless protocol have you seen at the airport?
When TSA rolled out WBI (both backscatter and MMW), the focus was clearing non-metallic threats, not an increase in speed. The difference in speed at GSO is miniscule, maybe an average of 3-5 seconds difference from a WTMD. Other airports may have different experiences in time variations.
Last edited by TWA884; Jul 17, 2016 at 8:32 am Reason: Conform to moderator's edit of quoted post
#13
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,629
How do you calculate the time at GSO?
As a pax, I calculate the time from the moment I'm directed to move towards the NoS, WTMD or grope station until the time I am free to take my belongings and go.
There is no way that I can clear the WTMD (never alarmed yet) and retrieve my belongings within 3-5 seconds of the time it takes me to be 'satisfactorily' positioned (one arm at my side) for the NoS, the scan completed, and the anomaly grope completed. That has only been permitted once. Normally, from the time I explain (and demonstrate, when the TSO demands it) my physical limitations, it takes a few minutes for a trained <redacted by moderator> to arrive, do the grope, and conduct the mandatory bag search/swab. This year the wait for a <redacted by moderator> has been as long as 20 minutes at ORD.
I understand that at some airports, TSA calculates official wait times starting at the TDC. That may help with TSA planning and PR, but I don't think it's how most pax calculate their wait times. Perhaps something similar is going on with the way GSO and some other airports calculate checkpoint transit times. I think when most pax talk about the time it takes to clear a checkpoint via WTMD vs. NoS, they're not limiting the discussion to the time actually spent being scanned, they are incuding the entire process, including anomaly resolutions or mandatory bag inspections for pax physically incapable of using the NoS.
As a pax, I calculate the time from the moment I'm directed to move towards the NoS, WTMD or grope station until the time I am free to take my belongings and go.
There is no way that I can clear the WTMD (never alarmed yet) and retrieve my belongings within 3-5 seconds of the time it takes me to be 'satisfactorily' positioned (one arm at my side) for the NoS, the scan completed, and the anomaly grope completed. That has only been permitted once. Normally, from the time I explain (and demonstrate, when the TSO demands it) my physical limitations, it takes a few minutes for a trained <redacted by moderator> to arrive, do the grope, and conduct the mandatory bag search/swab. This year the wait for a <redacted by moderator> has been as long as 20 minutes at ORD.
I understand that at some airports, TSA calculates official wait times starting at the TDC. That may help with TSA planning and PR, but I don't think it's how most pax calculate their wait times. Perhaps something similar is going on with the way GSO and some other airports calculate checkpoint transit times. I think when most pax talk about the time it takes to clear a checkpoint via WTMD vs. NoS, they're not limiting the discussion to the time actually spent being scanned, they are incuding the entire process, including anomaly resolutions or mandatory bag inspections for pax physically incapable of using the NoS.
Last edited by TWA884; Jul 16, 2016 at 10:45 am Reason: Term not used in this forum; please refer to sticky thread.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,079
Just the time it takes for a traveler to enter and assume the position for WBI far exceeds the time needed to pass through a WTMD. Add in the scan time and required time just increases. I think proof is evident in how fast Pre Check lines move in comparison to regular lines. There is always a backup for the Whole Body Imager.
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,629
Just the time it takes for a traveler to enter and assume the position for WBI far exceeds the time needed to pass through a WTMD. Add in the scan time and required time just increases. I think proof is evident in how fast Pre Check lines move in comparison to regular lines. There is always a backup for the Whole Body Imager.
I thought the figures were optimistic at best then, and deceptive at worst. I never saw what I considered a valid end-to-end comparison of checkpoint transit times, and that was before I saw how many false positives requiring additional hands-on clearance there were going to be. Perhaps some FSDs choose not to include any of that time in their figures.