Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flute Police

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2015, 3:46 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 574
Flute Police

http://www.classicfm.com/music-news/...utist-airport/

But today a power-hungry agent decided to mess with me and said my flute headjoint needed to be removed from its case and run thru the X-ray LOOSE in a bin.”
“I said this was absolutely not an option, despite three supervisors assuring me my flute made of gold ‘would be fine’ rattling around in a bin. And when I insisted that this was not, in fact, 'standard procedure' and closed the case so they wouldn’t damage it, they called the Chicago Police department to have me removed from the airport.”

Schmitz was then fully searched by the police, while the flute itself was wrapped in nothing more than paper towels as it was scanned.
yandosan is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 4:10 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 461
I like this whinny story about the Guarneri. I wonder if that's the same fiddle Maurice Minnifield hired Cal to give the once over.

Put your kazoo in the damn dog bowl and get out of my way. You're blocking the bloody line.
Fleck is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 4:16 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,340
Blimey, musicians, TSA, valuable instruments, well it's just asking for trouble isn't it. Every violin player is like their instrument in my experience, highly strung !
Silver Fox is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 4:43 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
Unless it's a lead-lined case, there's nothing AFAIK in the TSA regs or policies saying it has to be removed for x-ray. And there's stuff to the contrary. She could even insist on manual screening (i.e. ETD swabs etc).
saizai is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 4:49 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,094
TSA was once again totaly out of line or perhaps the science of x-rays are somehow different at TSA checkpoints.

I can't imagine what perceived threat a flute represented to this TSA screener.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 7:51 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
Originally Posted by Fleck
I can certainly understand why someone wouldn't want their instrument to go into checked baggage, but to demand that the flight attendants try to rearrange bags and inconvenience dozens of other passengers is absurd.

If the instrument needs to travel with you in the cabin, then you need to either get it a seat, or, alternatively, at very least pay a little bit extra to get priority boarding, to ensure there's space. Also, I'm almost certain that any violin case is going to be too large for the sizer, so anytime she's carrying it on, she's technically getting an exception.

ETA: As chollie correctly pointed out, the last sentence is simply wrong. Not deleted for purposes of posterity.

Last edited by cestmoi123; Oct 7, 2015 at 7:33 am Reason: chollie pointed out the error in my last sentence
cestmoi123 is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 8:29 am
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
Originally Posted by cestmoi123
I can certainly understand why someone wouldn't want their instrument to go into checked baggage, but to demand that the flight attendants try to rearrange bags and inconvenience dozens of other passengers is absurd.

If the instrument needs to travel with you in the cabin, then you need to either get it a seat, or, alternatively, at very least pay a little bit extra to get priority boarding, to ensure there's space. Also, I'm almost certain that any violin case is going to be too large for the sizer, so anytime she's carrying it on, she's technically getting an exception.
(bolding mine)

Wrong. The rule enacted in 2012 says otherwise. If a musical instrument can fit somewhere in the cabin, the airlines must try to accommodate it - assuming the space is available. In this instance, the only thing the musician did 'wrong' was try to board too late, after all available cabin space was taken.

Priority boarding (or first class) do absolutely nothing for you if you arrive to the airport late or your connection is delayed.
chollie is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 10:21 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
Originally Posted by chollie
(bolding mine)

Wrong. The rule enacted in 2012 says otherwise. If a musical instrument can fit somewhere in the cabin, the airlines must try to accommodate it - assuming the space is available. In this instance, the only thing the musician did 'wrong' was try to board too late, after all available cabin space was taken.

Priority boarding (or first class) do absolutely nothing for you if you arrive to the airport late or your connection is delayed.
I stand corrected regarding the space issue. One tiny caveat - the law passed in 2012, but the rule only went into effect on March 6, 2015.

https://www.transportation.gov/sites...nstruments.pdf
cestmoi123 is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 10:51 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,094
A musicians tools are important to them and in many cases extremely valuable. Without them no performance. No one should ever place valuable things in checked luggage. Here's a case where the performer did and the outcome.


Results from the video on United's stock price?

http://www.fastcompany.com/1320152/b...ne-180-million

According to the Times of London, "...within four days of the song going online, the gathering thunderclouds of bad PR caused United Airlines' stock price to suffer a mid-flight stall, and it plunged by 10%, costing shareholders $180 million. Which, incidentally, would have bought Carroll more than 51,000 replacement guitars."
There are two later videos by Dave Carroll worth watching found at:

http://www.davecarrollmusic.com/music/ubg/

For a TSA screener to require a traveler to place the headjoint of a flute in an unprotected bin is unacceptable. A visual inspection would have satisfied any security concerns.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Oct 6, 2015, 12:16 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXPLT
Posts: 99
She was on her way back home from Band Camp, so that may have been the issue.

Just my $0.02.
thetaxman is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2015, 7:28 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
Originally Posted by thetaxman
She was on her way back home from Band Camp, so that may have been the issue.
In which case, the screener would be entirely justified in wanting to wear gloves.
cestmoi123 is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2015, 8:06 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
Originally Posted by Fleck
I like this whinny story about the Guarneri. I wonder if that's the same fiddle Maurice Minnifield hired Cal to give the once over.

Put your kazoo in the damn dog bowl and get out of my way. You're blocking the bloody line.
Sure, FTers will whine and complain bitterly when they are told to check their Tumi suitcases or "valuable" electronics, but heaven forbid that someone in front of them with a $30k flute or a 6-figure violin should hold up the line.
gobluetwo is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2015, 2:07 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: KSUX
Posts: 906
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
Sure, FTers will whine and complain bitterly when they are told to check their Tumi suitcases or "valuable" electronics, but heaven forbid that someone in front of them with a $30k flute or a 6-figure violin should hold up the line.
Yeah sometimes the hypocrisy here makes me shake my head and laugh. I have sympathy for the musician for the same reasons why I refuse to check my electronics and camera gear.
LtKernelPanic is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.