TSA: you objected instead of answering our questions, so you had no right to speak
#16
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: IAD
Posts: 319
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,753
That struck me, too. Where's the (unedited) video?
#18
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
#19
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: IAD
Posts: 319
TSA: you objected instead of answering our questions, so you had no right to speak
OP, why should any of us care about this? You've filed a lawsuit because you were subjected to secondary and you don't think it was fair? Get out. (1) anyone can be selected for secondary, at any time. Secondary isn't being arrested, or an unreasonable search, you take on the risk of secondary when you decide to fly, so what remedy to you think the courts should award you to make you whole from the experience of going through secondary? (2) You're asking us to support you by donating to your legal fund? For what? You aren't asking us to support you to stay out of prison, or to defend you from a liability you can't afford. If you are awarded damages (or even attorney fees), are you going use that award to pay back those who donate to you?
#20
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
OP, why should any of us care about this? You've filed a lawsuit because you were subjected to secondary and you don't think it was fair? Get out. (1) anyone can be selected for secondary, at any time. Secondary isn't being arrested, or an unreasonable search, you take on the risk of secondary when you decide to fly, so what remedy to you think the courts should award you to make you whole from the experience of going through secondary? (2) You're asking us to support you by donating to your legal fund? For what? You aren't asking us to support you to stay out of prison, or to defend you from a liability you can't afford. If you are awarded damages (or even attorney fees), are you going use that award to pay back those who donate to you?
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,680
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Or, if they gave him 8 hrs of footage, I'd be appreciative if he trimmed out the non-pertinent 7hrs and 55 mins. Otherwise, yes, it should be unedited.
#24
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: IAD
Posts: 319
Sometimes, I wish everyone got subjected to secondary so we could end this pontification. In the words of Gunnery Sergeant Hartman, "You are all equally worthless in my eyes." And yes, I've been on the receiving end of plenty of secondary screenings. I would have preferred not to, but I cooperated and the experience was brief and uneventful.
The OPs disability may be a protected class, but uncooperative and unpleasant isn't a protected class. I'd use stronger terms, but the OP has already demonstrated their litigious nature and I don't want to be named in a libel suit. Being in a protected class doesn't protect you from inconvenience, it just means you have to be treated the same as everyone else, and reasonable accommodation must be made. "I shouldn't have to be subjected to secondary" isn't a reasonable accommodation.
The OP is asking me send money. We should all be skeptical.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,680
They took my nitro pills away and threatened me. Now every time I fly, my stress levels are through the roof because I can't carry my pills. You know, all the signs of stress that make me suspicious in the eyes of the BDOs.
My life is literally on the line every time I fly, thanks to TSA. I fight that battle every time I fly. If there's a casualty, it will be me, not some TSO who is allowed to carry his/her pills on the job with impunity.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
I bend over backwards to avoid confrontation or giving offense.
They took my nitro pills away and threatened me. Now every time I fly, my stress levels are through the roof because I can't carry my pills. You know, all the signs of stress that make me suspicious in the eyes of the BDOs.
My life is literally on the line every time I fly, thanks to TSA. I fight that battle every time I fly. If there's a casualty, it will be me, not some TSO who is allowed to carry his/her pills on the job with impunity.
They took my nitro pills away and threatened me. Now every time I fly, my stress levels are through the roof because I can't carry my pills. You know, all the signs of stress that make me suspicious in the eyes of the BDOs.
My life is literally on the line every time I fly, thanks to TSA. I fight that battle every time I fly. If there's a casualty, it will be me, not some TSO who is allowed to carry his/her pills on the job with impunity.
If I were you I would do exactly that and force the issue. There is absolutely no reason to not travel with Life Saving medicines. You know, I know, and TSA knows that Medical Nitroglycerin medicines are not and cannot be made into an explosive.
This is one of those times when standing up for your rights is worth confrontation even if that means taking TSA to court to enforce your right to travel safely.
#27
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,680
According to TSA's Blogger Bob you can take your Nitro Pills when you fly.
If I were you I would do exactly that and force the issue. There is absolutely no reason to not travel with Life Saving medicines. You know, I know, and TSA knows that Medical Nitroglycerin medicines are not and cannot be made into an explosive.
This is one of those times when standing up for your rights is worth confrontation even if that means taking TSA to court to enforce your right to travel safely.
If I were you I would do exactly that and force the issue. There is absolutely no reason to not travel with Life Saving medicines. You know, I know, and TSA knows that Medical Nitroglycerin medicines are not and cannot be made into an explosive.
This is one of those times when standing up for your rights is worth confrontation even if that means taking TSA to court to enforce your right to travel safely.
That said, the blog is not binding at the checkpoint. Nor is the website, for that matter, but at least it means they can't accuse me of 'artful concealment'. The website is not binding, it is still up to screener discretion. I was threatened and warned when it happened, report submitted, etc.
I'm not a soldier, others will have to fight this battle. I'd probably go into cardiac arrest at the checkpoint and they'd deny me the very pills they were holding in their blue-gloved hands while calling the LEs to report an attempted suicide attack.
No, Boggie, if someone else wants to fight to try to improve the organization, I will cheer them on. I literally put my life on the line, that's as far as I'm going to go.
#28
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
I haven't seen Blogger Bob say that.
That said, the blog is not binding at the checkpoint. Nor is the website, for that matter, but at least it means they can't accuse me of 'artful concealment'. The website is not binding, it is still up to screener discretion. I was threatened and warned when it happened, report submitted, etc.
I'm not a soldier, others will have to fight this battle. I'd probably go into cardiac arrest at the checkpoint and they'd deny me the very pills they were holding in their blue-gloved hands while calling the LEs to report an attempted suicide attack.
No, Boggie, if someone else wants to fight to try to improve the organization, I will cheer them on. I literally put my life on the line, that's as far as I'm going to go.
That said, the blog is not binding at the checkpoint. Nor is the website, for that matter, but at least it means they can't accuse me of 'artful concealment'. The website is not binding, it is still up to screener discretion. I was threatened and warned when it happened, report submitted, etc.
I'm not a soldier, others will have to fight this battle. I'd probably go into cardiac arrest at the checkpoint and they'd deny me the very pills they were holding in their blue-gloved hands while calling the LEs to report an attempted suicide attack.
No, Boggie, if someone else wants to fight to try to improve the organization, I will cheer them on. I literally put my life on the line, that's as far as I'm going to go.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
I haven't seen Blogger Bob say that.
That said, the blog is not binding at the checkpoint. Nor is the website, for that matter, but at least it means they can't accuse me of 'artful concealment'. The website is not binding, it is still up to screener discretion. I was threatened and warned when it happened, report submitted, etc.
I'm not a soldier, others will have to fight this battle. I'd probably go into cardiac arrest at the checkpoint and they'd deny me the very pills they were holding in their blue-gloved hands while calling the LEs to report an attempted suicide attack.
No, Boggie, if someone else wants to fight to try to improve the organization, I will cheer them on. I literally put my life on the line, that's as far as I'm going to go.
That said, the blog is not binding at the checkpoint. Nor is the website, for that matter, but at least it means they can't accuse me of 'artful concealment'. The website is not binding, it is still up to screener discretion. I was threatened and warned when it happened, report submitted, etc.
I'm not a soldier, others will have to fight this battle. I'd probably go into cardiac arrest at the checkpoint and they'd deny me the very pills they were holding in their blue-gloved hands while calling the LEs to report an attempted suicide attack.
No, Boggie, if someone else wants to fight to try to improve the organization, I will cheer them on. I literally put my life on the line, that's as far as I'm going to go.
However, for a screener to deny a medicine that is not excessive, is not a LGA, and is not WEI is something that can be fought against. And so what if the screener from the first incident made a report? That report would be in your favor if this got attention outside of TSA.
I encourage you to stand up for your rights. Start by contacting your elected representatives and asking for assistance.
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Sometimes, I wish everyone got subjected to secondary so we could end this pontification. In the words of Gunnery Sergeant Hartman, "You are all equally worthless in my eyes." And yes, I've been on the receiving end of plenty of secondary screenings. I would have preferred not to, but I cooperated and the experience was brief and uneventful.
You're better off that way. If you didn't, they'd probably bend you over forward.
Mike