Let's say that 'they' want to check content of your USB drive...
#32
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 4,548
Legitimate use?
How about: "If someone steals my stuff it is designed to destroy either my laptop or their laptop."
Cool concept, BTW. Reminds me of a personalGPS jammer I ran across years ago. Back then it was "why would you need that?"...I bet you could sell them like hotcakes now!
How about: "If someone steals my stuff it is designed to destroy either my laptop or their laptop."
Cool concept, BTW. Reminds me of a personalGPS jammer I ran across years ago. Back then it was "why would you need that?"...I bet you could sell them like hotcakes now!
#33
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 817
I'm a computer security researcher. I wouldn't bring that into an airport personally.
If you read the details, it's got a bunch of capacitors soldered onto the board - kind of like a hand made taser. Sounds like a great way to get charged with smuggling a weapon.
If you read the details, it's got a bunch of capacitors soldered onto the board - kind of like a hand made taser. Sounds like a great way to get charged with smuggling a weapon.
#34
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
Reminds me of a personalGPS jammer I ran across years ago.
FWIW I've had (normal) peripherals that happened to degrade in such a way as to short out and power spike the USB port they were plugged in to. Not enough to damage, but enough to make the USB controller freak out and cut itself off.
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 817
The latter's not legal; the former is.
I suspect the FCC may not approve of that.
I probably wouldn't bring it either, but I'd defend someone doing so.
FWIW I've had (normal) peripherals that happened to degrade in such a way as to short out and power spike the USB port they were plugged in to. Not enough to damage, but enough to make the USB controller freak out and cut itself off.
I suspect the FCC may not approve of that.
I probably wouldn't bring it either, but I'd defend someone doing so.
FWIW I've had (normal) peripherals that happened to degrade in such a way as to short out and power spike the USB port they were plugged in to. Not enough to damage, but enough to make the USB controller freak out and cut itself off.
It wouldn't be something that an organization like ACLU or EFF would be likely to take up either, so even if found not guilty you'd probably drop at least $20K in lawyer's fees.
#36
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 4,548
Well, when the police come to arrest ME for damaging a thief's laptop, then *I* will know the name of the thief.
Oh, what law would I be breaking?
Perhaps.
Frankly if I was trying to jam a receiver within 20 ft I couldnt care less about the FCC
Oh, what law would I be breaking?
I suspect the FCC may not approve of that.
Frankly if I was trying to jam a receiver within 20 ft I couldnt care less about the FCC
#37
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
Intentional damage of someone else's property, which falls under various laws. Probably also the CFAA.
Frankly if I was trying to jam a receiver within 20 ft I couldnt care less about the FCC
#38
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
That said, why WOULD you want to jam someone else's GPS receiver?
#39
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
I dont want you to jam someone else's GPS receiver, I want you to want to jam someone else's GPS receiver.
(Movie reference; sorry, couldnt resist - goes with some of the government jobs I sometimes work with).
(Movie reference; sorry, couldnt resist - goes with some of the government jobs I sometimes work with).
#40
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP...couple hotels and cars too
Posts: 4,548
But in the way I was speaking earkier in the thread, if you are doing something serious enough to jam someone's GPS receiver, you are likely going to be breaking laws far more likely to be prosecuted then the crack investigative team at the FCC.