Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Did TSA Pre-check allow an Army officer IMPOSTER through to fly out of BWI?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Did TSA Pre-check allow an Army officer IMPOSTER through to fly out of BWI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2015, 9:14 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 221
Did TSA Pre-check allow an Army officer IMPOSTER through to fly out of BWI?

http://youtu.be/6WHApREqchA
willpolice4food is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2015, 10:17 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Valid boarding pass, valid driver's license, but a fake uniform. That's tough. Should they have caught that? Hard to say. ACUs are so basic that buying a set at a surplus store and with a minimum of knowledge would make a fake hard to spot. Of course this all begs the question about TSA being "fashion police" even if in this case it was a potentially fake uniform.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 8:36 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
Originally Posted by Randyk47
Valid boarding pass, valid driver's license, but a fake uniform. That's tough. Should they have caught that? Hard to say. ACUs are so basic that buying a set at a surplus store and with a minimum of knowledge would make a fake hard to spot. Of course this all begs the question about TSA being "fashion police" even if in this case it was a potentially fake uniform.
(bolding mine)

No, and they should not be worried about it if they did the rest of their job correctly.

How is dressing in costume, however convincing, a threat to aviation safety?
chollie is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 8:49 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by chollie
(bolding mine)

No, and they should not be worried about it if they did the rest of their job correctly.

How is dressing in costume, however convincing, a threat to aviation safety?
That was kind of my point. They hopefully did their basic job, checking for the proper wear or use of uniform is not. Have to add that while not 100% forbidden, and maybe discouraged is a better word, the Army has guidance out that soldiers should not travel in ACUs. Kind of a switch in policy after encouraging the wear of ACUs in public during the height of the Iraq/Afghanistan conflict. Actually sat next to a colonel in ACUs on a flight a couple of weeks ago and mentioned the new policy, in a polite way as part of our conversation. He was a reservist and hadn't heard about the change but thanked me. He actually seemed slightly embarrassed.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 9:02 am
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
Originally Posted by Randyk47
That was kind of my point. They hopefully did their basic job, checking for the proper wear or use of uniform is not. Have to add that while not 100% forbidden, and maybe discouraged is a better word, the Army has guidance out that soldiers should not travel in ACUs. Kind of a switch in policy after encouraging the wear of ACUs in public during the height of the Iraq/Afghanistan conflict. Actually sat next to a colonel in ACUs on a flight a couple of weeks ago and mentioned the new policy, in a polite way as part of our conversation. He was a reservist and hadn't heard about the change but thanked me. He actually seemed slightly embarrassed.
This is a military issue; the military is responsible for doing its own policing.

Imagine if your seatmate had been turned away at the checkpoint because he didn't know the new rules. Would anyone have been any safer if he had been denied access to the sterile area?
chollie is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 10:09 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by chollie
This is a military issue; the military is responsible for doing its own policing.

Imagine if your seatmate had been turned away at the checkpoint because he didn't know the new rules. Would anyone have been any safer if he had been denied access to the sterile area?
Kind of like wearing white before Memorial Day. None of TSA's business.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 1:44 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NY State
Posts: 212
My son is in the Army and has been told not to wear his ACU's while traveling. In fact, unless he is "working", he is not to be wearing them. I am on an Army support group, and some are told not to wear and them others are told they can wear them.

Seems like if they want to police it, they need to start with giving out the same information to all. I am not surprised at all that the reservist had not heard of this policy. I hope he wasn't too embarrassed...............
Jane42 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 6:11 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by willpolice4food
Originally Posted by Randyk47
Valid boarding pass, valid driver's license, but a fake uniform. That's tough. Should they have caught that? Hard to say. ACUs are so basic that buying a set at a surplus store and with a minimum of knowledge would make a fake hard to spot. Of course this all begs the question about TSA being "fashion police" even if in this case it was a potentially fake uniform.
  1. Not our job.
  2. It's not illegal anyways except under UCMJ Article 134, so it doesn't apply, unless he's military.

Hence so the reason impostors get away with acts of "stolen valor."
LoganTSO is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 7:22 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by LoganTSO
  1. Not our job.
  2. It's not illegal anyways except under UCMJ Article 134, so it doesn't apply, unless he's military.

Hence so the reason impostors get away with acts of "stolen valor."
I hope I didn't come off as even slightly amblivalent about the potential of it being a case of "stolen valor", I find the behavior reprehensible.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 7:53 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by LoganTSO
  1. Not our job.
  2. It's not illegal anyways except under UCMJ Article 134, so it doesn't apply, unless he's military.

Hence so the reason impostors get away with acts of "stolen valor."
If he was by chance not in the military, and not eligible for Pre Check, then was Pre Check level screening adequate and if it was then why is it not adequate across the board?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2015, 11:05 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 125
As a retired military member, my question is this: Where is his military ID card or CAC in contemporary terms? All active duty military members are required to have that card on their person at all times, perhaps not in the bathtub. But what I am trying to say is that if one is traveling in a military uniform you have to have the "card". Now, if this guy is not in the military but "enjoys" wearing military attire fine but I would strongly suggest that he wear his uniforms in the bedroom instead of a public venue. Uniform fetish/fantasy? Good for you! But wearing a "fake" military uniform out in public could cause problem. I say keep it in the bedroom/dungeon/fetish/uniform club scene. Furthermore, military members traveling with military ID are typically allowed to pass through Pre Check? That would look pretty bad trying to explain to a TSA agent why the military member lacked that "card". Years ago, I lost my military ID card and can tell you the humiliation I had to endure having that replaced. For those in the USAF even worse, losing a line badge.

Last edited by usafwso; Mar 2, 2015 at 11:35 pm
usafwso is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 4:55 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Surely any BD"O" worth his salt should have caught this imposter. Isn't that what those BD"O" are supposed to do?
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 5:50 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,376
Lightbulb

Did the guy have a weapn? No? Then why are we discussing this in a checkpoints/security frum?!
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 6:01 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
This only serves to highlight the silliness of providing PreCheck automatically to members of the military. The odds of any individual committing a terrorist attack are vanishingly small (hence why PreCheck should be the standard for everybody), but there's ZERO evidence that the military are LESS likely to commit these attacks. In fact, active duty military are statistically more likely to commit a terrorist attack than the population at large. Two of the three largest (in terms of fatalities) terrorist attacks in the US in the last twenty years were committed by active duty or military veterans.

Again, I'm not saying that members of the military are somehow dangerous, but rather that there is zero justification for treating them as somehow LESS dangerous.
cestmoi123 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:33 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by cestmoi123
This only serves to highlight the silliness of providing PreCheck automatically to members of the military.
Well technically, it's not entirely automatic. To get PreCheck they have to enter the DOD ID# on the back on their CAC (military ID) card. Otherwise, no PreCheck.

Last edited by LoganTSO; Mar 4, 2015 at 7:18 am Reason: missing bracket on quote tag
LoganTSO is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.