Explosives Left at Sydney Airport in Police Dog Training Drill
Sep 11, 2014, 11:42 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SAN/LAX
Programs: UA Gold, VX Silver, HH Gold, Hyatt Gold, JPM Palladium
Posts: 627
Explosives Left at Sydney Airport in Police Dog Training Drill
After conducting an on-site sniffer dog training exercise at Sydney Airport, Australian federal police accidentally left behind a suitcase with 230-grams (8-ounces) of plastic explosives.
Three weeks later, a woman whose own suitcase was damaged during her travels was given the suitcase containing the explosives by airport staff. After arriving at home, she discovered the explosives, and took the suitcase to a local police station.
The Australian federal police has apologized for the incident and has stated that the explosives weren't live and didn't pose any danger.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...ing-drill.html
Three weeks later, a woman whose own suitcase was damaged during her travels was given the suitcase containing the explosives by airport staff. After arriving at home, she discovered the explosives, and took the suitcase to a local police station.
The Australian federal police has apologized for the incident and has stated that the explosives weren't live and didn't pose any danger.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...ing-drill.html
Sep 11, 2014, 12:00 pm
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The Australian federal police has apologized for the incident and has stated that the explosives weren't live and didn't pose any danger.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Oskar_Nobel
Last edited by GUWonder; Sep 12, 2014 at 8:41 am
Sep 12, 2014, 9:06 am
#4
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
"The explosives weren't live?" What does that mean? Were they real explosives or just modeling clay? Or perhaps a special mix of modeling clay with just a tiny smidge of real explosives that would attract sniffers but not go boom?
Or do they simply mean that the explosives didn't have a detonator attached and thus was extremely unlikely to go boom, unless intentionally acted upon by someone who knows how to detonate such materials?
Or do they simply mean that the explosives didn't have a detonator attached and thus was extremely unlikely to go boom, unless intentionally acted upon by someone who knows how to detonate such materials?
Sep 12, 2014, 9:11 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
"The explosives weren't live?" What does that mean? Were they real explosives or just modeling clay? Or perhaps a special mix of modeling clay with just a tiny smidge of real explosives that would attract sniffers but not go boom?
Or do they simply mean that the explosives didn't have a detonator attached and thus was extremely unlikely to go boom, unless intentionally acted upon by someone who knows how to detonate such materials?
Or do they simply mean that the explosives didn't have a detonator attached and thus was extremely unlikely to go boom, unless intentionally acted upon by someone who knows how to detonate such materials?
It's not just knowing how to detonate them, it's having the cap to do it with.
Sep 16, 2014, 4:01 pm
#6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
Something like that happened years ago to a NWA flight out of SEA. The Port police borrowed an off-duty DC-10 to train their bomb-sniffing dogs, and neglected to police all the sticks of dynamite they're planted in various places. When the plane took off on a flight to Tokyo and was climbing out, the stick left behind rolled out from under a seat and continued down the aisle before encountering a flight attendant's foot. The flight came back, circled for an hour or two while it dumped fuel (another snafu, as the fuel didn't vaporize as normal and nuked several gardens in West Seattle), then landed. The Port waived the landing fee, at least.
Sep 17, 2014, 8:05 am
#7
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
If it was the TSA/DHS which did this, the dog would have gotten promoted and the dog's handler would be sent for re-training 
Sep 17, 2014, 10:17 am
#8
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Meanwhile, on FT, there would be a huge outcry and demand for the dog to be euthanized and the handler fired and brought up on charges. Followed inevitably by calls for the dog to be retrained as a service dog and gifted to some charitable organization, and for the TSA handler to be euthanized.