Traveling with Nitro Pills

Old Jun 9, 2014, 6:30 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Traveling with Nitro Pills

I have seen tons of discussion on Nitro pills the last couple of months and am starting this thread to give more information to those of you that would like to know the status on this item. Nitroglycerine pills are an allowed substance based on the following page : http://www.tsa.gov/traveler-informat...ohibited-items

The result when "nitro pills is entered into the search box is as follows:

Search Results For:

nitro pills

Check or Carry-on
TSA allows larger amounts of medically necessary liquids, gels, and aerosols in reasonable quantities for your trip, but you must declare them to security officers at the checkpoint for inspection.
We recommend, but do not require, that your medications be labeled to facilitate the security process.

You may carry non-medically necessary liquids, gels and aerosols in your carry-on bags only if they adhere to the 3-1-1 rule: containers must be 3.4 ounces or less; stored in a 1 quart/liter zip-top bag; 1 zip-top bag per person. Larger amounts of non-medicinal liquids, gels, and aerosols must be placed in checked baggage.

Even if an item is generally permitted, it may be subject to additional screening or not allowed through the checkpoint if it triggers an alarm during the screening process, appears to have been tampered with, or poses other security concerns. The final decision rests with TSA on whether to allow any items on the plane.


I hope that this helps in the discussion.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 6:32 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
No, it does not help the discussion, due to this:

The final decision rests with TSA on whether to allow any items on the plane.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 7:00 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Update with more information -

Nitroglycerin patch gives this result -

Search Results For:

nitroglycerin patch

Check or Carry-on
You may transport this item in carry-on baggage or in checked baggage. For items you wish to carry-on, you should check with the airline to ensure that the item will fit in the overhead bin or underneath the seat of the airplane.
To help officers get a clear look at your bag and reduce the need for additional screening, we suggest you pack your bag in neat layers (layer of clothes, layer of electronics, layer of clothes, layer of shoes, etc.) and wrap cords tightly around electronics items.

Even if an item is generally permitted, it may be subject to additional screening or not allowed through the checkpoint if it triggers an alarm during the screening process, appears to have been tampered with, or poses other security concerns. The final decision rests with TSA on whether to allow any items on the plane.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 8:19 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,153
It also depends upon where the particular clerk got his medical degree and in which state he's licensed to practice medicine.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 8:27 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
The TSA needs to come out with a statement that ALL prescribed meds are allowed on a plane, absolutely no exceptions, and no screener is allowed to deny any passenger his/her medication.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 8:28 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
It also depends upon where the particular clerk got his medical degree and in which state he's licensed to practice medicine.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 8:33 am
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Originally Posted by petaluma1
The TSA needs to come out with a statement that ALL prescribed meds are allowed on a plane, absolutely no exceptions, and no screener is allowed to deny any passenger his/her medication.
That would have to come from much higher up the food chain than myself. I am simply relaying information that I have seen questions on for some time, and I (now) have the published information to back up the answer that I am giving.
gsoltso is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 8:45 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,237
I appreciate this, <deleted>, and I know you personally have nothing to do with the decisions HQ makes.

I suspect what is now available to the public on the website is exactly what was in place as SSI SOP when my pills were confiscated. Nothing appears to have changed in that regard.

They were confiscated because the 'final decision' was that the medical rules were overridden by the zero tolerance, NO exceptions rule that applies to certain substances, regardless of purpose or quantity. In principle, I get that, I really do. I have no doubt that TSOs are trained 'when in doubt, don't take chances, take the item'.

I never suggested that my pills were confiscated because of one rogue TSO. Multiple 'layers' of TSOs were summoned, all the way up to suits, and the opinion was unanimous: two rules were in conflict, and the rule about explosive substances was more important. The threats I got that day went way beyond DY...T - more like DY...EverAgain.

Reminder: there was no alarm, swabbing didn't test positive. The pills were found during a bag search when the TSO read the label on the bottle.

Last edited by TWA884; Jun 26, 2017 at 3:04 pm Reason: Privacy / Conform to moderator's edit of quoted post
chollie is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 9:18 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by gsoltso
That would have to come from much higher up the food chain than myself. I am simply relaying information that I have seen questions on for some time, and I (now) have the published information to back up the answer that I am giving.
The published information does not address the issue, however. Until it does, your response is generally useless.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 9:20 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,330
Originally Posted by gsoltso
That would have to come from much higher up the food chain than myself. I am simply relaying information that I have seen questions on for some time, and I (now) have the published information to back up the answer that I am giving.
Originally Posted by chollie
I appreciate this, <deleted>, and I know you personally have nothing to do with the decisions HQ makes.

I suspect what is now available to the public on the website is exactly what was in place as SSI SOP when my pills were confiscated. Nothing appears to have changed in that regard.

They were confiscated because the 'final decision' was that the medical rules were overridden by the zero tolerance, NO exceptions rule that applies to certain substances, regardless of purpose or quantity. In principle, I get that, I really do. I have no doubt that TSOs are trained 'when in doubt, don't take chances, take the item'.

I never suggested that my pills were confiscated because of one rogue TSO. Multiple 'layers' of TSOs were summoned, all the way up to suits, and the opinion was unanimous: two rules were in conflict, and the rule about explosive substances was more important. The threats I got that day went way beyond DY...T - more like DY...EverAgain.

Reminder: there was no alarm, swabbing didn't test positive. The pills were found during a bag search when the TSO read the label on the bottle.
<deleted>, I truly appreciate the effort you've made, but to be perfectly candid, it's useless to simply repeat the information from the TSA web site - which we've all looked at ourselves multiple times, including the very same searches you've done - rather than taking it up the line and getting some definitive policy clarification from your superiors.

If you look at Chollie's experience, what you see is a systemic stupidity. Multiple layers of TSA all said, "No nitro pills", and for only one reason - because explosives are prohibited in any quantities, no matter how small.

Well, that's fine, except medical nitro pills and patches are NOT explosive, in any quantities. I could take 50 pounds of them aboard a plane, pound them to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle, and they WOULD NOT EXPLODE. The other chemicals mixed with with the nitro in pills and patches chemically neutralizes the explosive component, rendering it completely harmless.

However, the ridiculous urban legend that nitro pills can explode continues to be perpetuated by ignorant people. The multiple TSA employees who backed the confiscation of Chollie's pills - thus endangering his life - were all acting under a delusion.

Since you are not only a front-line TSO, but also a member of the TSA blog team, I challenge you to push this as far up the chain as you can, and not only through your direct chain of command at GSO, but through the blog team as well. I don't know whether Bob has any direct line to the upper management of the agency, but seeing as how he officially represents them on a mass media outlet, I would assume that he does, since he has to clear any information releases with someone before he puts them on the web. Talk to him.

Push till it gives, <deleted>. You have an opportunity here to potentially save lives by fighting against incompetence and ignorance in TSA ranks. And the best part of it is that you will not be challenging any established policy in any way - you'll only be asking that upper management send out a memo and a press release verifying that an urban myth is demonstrably false - that nitro pills and patches are permitted items because they ARE NOT EXPLOSIVES and thus are completely harmless to both aircraft and passengers.

Last edited by TWA884; Jun 26, 2017 at 3:05 pm Reason: Privacy / Conform to moderator's edit of quoted post
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 9:38 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by WillCAD
Well, that's fine, except medical nitro pills and patches are NOT explosive, in any quantities. I could take 50 pounds of them aboard a plane, pound them to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle, and they WOULD NOT EXPLODE. The other chemicals mixed with with the nitro in pills and patches chemically neutralizes the explosive component, rendering it completely harmless.
Well, for the sake of exactness, any powder will explode if at the right mix in the air when a spark is applied.

Coal, flour, nitro pills, chalk, sugar, plastic, wood, cardboard, hops, corn stalks, whey, cotton, wool. Anything. You name it, if it has carbon in it and it is powdered enough and floating free in the air at the right density when you apply a spark then you can make it explode.

Making enough of something in powder form and then getting it to explode on a plane such that it could cause any harm to anything or anyone, however, is so ridiculous that it's simply not going to happen.

As everyone except TSA seems to understand, nitro pills are zero risk to aviation.
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 1:34 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,643
Originally Posted by chollie
I appreciate this, <deleted>, and I know you personally have nothing to do with the decisions HQ makes.

I suspect what is now available to the public on the website is exactly what was in place as SSI SOP when my pills were confiscated. Nothing appears to have changed in that regard.

They were confiscated because the 'final decision' was that the medical rules were overridden by the zero tolerance, NO exceptions rule that applies to certain substances, regardless of purpose or quantity. In principle, I get that, I really do. I have no doubt that TSOs are trained 'when in doubt, don't take chances, take the item'.

I never suggested that my pills were confiscated because of one rogue TSO. Multiple 'layers' of TSOs were summoned, all the way up to suits, and the opinion was unanimous: two rules were in conflict, and the rule about explosive substances was more important. The threats I got that day went way beyond DY...T - more like DY...EverAgain.

Reminder: there was no alarm, swabbing didn't test positive. The pills were found during a bag search when the TSO read the label on the bottle.
That story is just about the scariest on here, and that's saying something. The fact that the TSA has the power to take away medication because they feel like it is horrifying.

Mike

Last edited by TWA884; Jun 26, 2017 at 3:05 pm Reason: Privacy / Conform to moderator's edit of quoted post
mikeef is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 2:01 pm
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,237
Nitro pills are not the only medical item not allowed.

There is one contact lens solution that is not permitted.

Like nitro pills, the solution falls in two categories: medical and zero tolerance forbidden substance. As is the case with nitro pills, the stricter rule is applied.
chollie is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 2:28 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 662
Originally Posted by chollie
Nitro pills are not the only medical item not allowed.

There is one contact lens solution that is not permitted.

Like nitro pills, the solution falls in two categories: medical and zero tolerance forbidden substance. As is the case with nitro pills, the stricter rule is applied.
A more accurate statement would be that any TSA screener can, on a whim, make up and impose any rule prohibiting any item. That is the practical reality.
T-the-B is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2014, 2:41 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Originally Posted by T-the-B
A more accurate statement would be that any TSA screener can, on a whim, make up and impose any rule prohibiting any item. That is the practical reality.
No TSA clerk has to make up a rule to prohibit an item. It is already codified:

"The final decision rests with TSA on whether to allow any items on the plane."
tkey75 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.