Traveling with Nitro Pills
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Well, for the sake of exactness, any powder will explode if at the right mix in the air when a spark is applied.
Coal, flour, nitro pills, chalk, sugar, plastic, wood, cardboard, hops, corn stalks, whey, cotton, wool. Anything. You name it, if it has carbon in it and it is powdered enough and floating free in the air at the right density when you apply a spark then you can make it explode.
Making enough of something in powder form and then getting it to explode on a plane such that it could cause any harm to anything or anyone, however, is so ridiculous that it's simply not going to happen.
As everyone except TSA seems to understand, nitro pills are zero risk to aviation.
Coal, flour, nitro pills, chalk, sugar, plastic, wood, cardboard, hops, corn stalks, whey, cotton, wool. Anything. You name it, if it has carbon in it and it is powdered enough and floating free in the air at the right density when you apply a spark then you can make it explode.
Making enough of something in powder form and then getting it to explode on a plane such that it could cause any harm to anything or anyone, however, is so ridiculous that it's simply not going to happen.
As everyone except TSA seems to understand, nitro pills are zero risk to aviation.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Nitro pills are not the only medical item not allowed.
There is one contact lens solution that is not permitted.
Like nitro pills, the solution falls in two categories: medical and zero tolerance forbidden substance. As is the case with nitro pills, the stricter rule is applied.
There is one contact lens solution that is not permitted.
Like nitro pills, the solution falls in two categories: medical and zero tolerance forbidden substance. As is the case with nitro pills, the stricter rule is applied.
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,663
Then I really would be in trouble. I'd be guilty of 'artful concealment' as well as having a prohibited substance.
#19
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
If TSA is serious about reassuring passengers about their ability to carry medications, they need to issue better statements than this one. Saying "it's allowed, except when it isn't" provides no actionable information.
#20
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
They were confiscated because the 'final decision' was that the medical rules were overridden by the zero tolerance, NO exceptions rule that applies to certain substances, regardless of purpose or quantity. In principle, I get that, I really do. I have no doubt that TSOs are trained 'when in doubt, don't take chances, take the item'.
I never suggested that my pills were confiscated because of one rogue TSO. Multiple 'layers' of TSOs were summoned, all the way up to suits, and the opinion was unanimous: two rules were in conflict, and the rule about explosive substances was more important. The threats I got that day went way beyond DY...T - more like DY...EverAgain.
Reminder: there was no alarm, swabbing didn't test positive. The pills were found during a bag search when the TSO read the label on the bottle.
I never suggested that my pills were confiscated because of one rogue TSO. Multiple 'layers' of TSOs were summoned, all the way up to suits, and the opinion was unanimous: two rules were in conflict, and the rule about explosive substances was more important. The threats I got that day went way beyond DY...T - more like DY...EverAgain.
Reminder: there was no alarm, swabbing didn't test positive. The pills were found during a bag search when the TSO read the label on the bottle.
It's possible that the only reason they weren't seized was because he carries them in an unlabled vial.
I think the correct term is combustible powder, not flammable. The powder does not have to be one that is easy to burn or ignite, just one that is burn-able.
Last edited by janetdoe; Jun 10, 2014 at 3:43 pm
#21
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 대한민국 (South Korea) - ex-PVG (上海)
Programs: UA MM / LT Gold (LT UC), DL SM, AA PLT (AC), OZ, KE; GE and Korean SES (like GE); Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,995
My wife's nitro pills are actually very small spherical capsules. What would happen if a passenger, having their nitro pills taken by TSA, suffered a heart attack on a TATL or TPAC flight and died? I guess TSA would say they were sorry, but protecting us from milligrams of nitroglycerin is more important than a single person's life.
#22
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
What would happen if a passenger, having their nitro pills taken by TSA, suffered a heart attack on a TATL or TPAC flight and died? I guess TSA would say they were sorry, but protecting us from milligrams of nitroglycerin is more important than a single person's life.
#23
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,663
My wife's nitro pills are actually very small spherical capsules. What would happen if a passenger, having their nitro pills taken by TSA, suffered a heart attack on a TATL or TPAC flight and died? I guess TSA would say they were sorry, but protecting us from milligrams of nitroglycerin is more important than a single person's life.
If you don't get your bag searched by a label-reading TSO, you're OK. If you're very careful to clean the bottle after taking a pill so that you don't accidentally contaminate yourself and test positive, you're OK.
In the statistically unlikely scenario that you don't have the pills and need them (doesn't have to be on a flight, could be on the way to the airport stuck in traffic, could be on a transcon, could be during a long layover or IRROPS) and you die, no doctor is going to go on record and say that the pills absolutely would have made a difference.
#24
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Unfortunately, the information you've posted really doesn't back up the answer. The statement (a) doesn't make any explicit reference to nitro pills, and (b) includes the usual "the decision of the TSA is final" disclaimer which renders any previous assurances moot.
If TSA is serious about reassuring passengers about their ability to carry medications, they need to issue better statements than this one. Saying "it's allowed, except when it isn't" provides no actionable information.
If TSA is serious about reassuring passengers about their ability to carry medications, they need to issue better statements than this one. Saying "it's allowed, except when it isn't" provides no actionable information.
I have posted the information that I have on a subject I have seen being questioned - which is all I can give you. I just wanted to let some of those asking the questions know that the items in question (nitro pills) are allowed based on the prohibited/allowed items list officially. Anything else will have to come from further up the food chain.
#25
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
I have just now e-mailed all my congresspeople requesting that they demand that the TSA come forth with a statement that nitroglycerin pills are allowed on all flights at all times and are not subject to "discretion" on the part of an individual screener.
Later this morning, I will call each of their offices.
I would also suggest that calls be made to the office of Mike McCaul, Chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, 202-225-2401, expressing the same concern.
Also, hit their Facebook pages, Twitter accounts, any and all social media.
Later this morning, I will call each of their offices.
I would also suggest that calls be made to the office of Mike McCaul, Chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, 202-225-2401, expressing the same concern.
Also, hit their Facebook pages, Twitter accounts, any and all social media.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 16,039
#27
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Oh, don't get me wrong. I know very well that TSA publishes something called an "allowed items list". But the list contains the very prominent disclaimer that anything on the "allowed" list might be disallowed at the discretion of the TSA.
So, according to TSA, there are three types of items that appear on a checkpoint:
- Items on the "prohibited" list, which are always prohibited.
- Items on the "allowed" list, which are allowed, except when they're prohibited --- and there's no way for a passenger to know ahead of time whether their "allowed" item will be allowed or prohibited.
- Items on neither list, which could be either allowed or prohibited, with no way for a passenger to know ahead of time.
Seriously ... TSA creates tons of problems for itself by publishing a list of "allowed" items and then repeatedly prohibiting passengers from carrying those items through a checkpoint. TSA should publish a list of prohibited items, and then simply say "everything else is subject to the
#28
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Nitro pills are not the only medical item not allowed.
There is one contact lens solution that is not permitted.
Like nitro pills, the solution falls in two categories: medical and zero tolerance forbidden substance. As is the case with nitro pills, the stricter rule is applied.
There is one contact lens solution that is not permitted.
Like nitro pills, the solution falls in two categories: medical and zero tolerance forbidden substance. As is the case with nitro pills, the stricter rule is applied.
For what it's worth, here's an interesting note:
In a clinical study versus the leading multi-purpose solutions, lens wearers rated this cleaning and disinfecting solution better for cleaning, initial comfort, end of day comfort, overall comfort and clarity of vision, providing a natural, no lens feel.
Meets TSA requirements *
#1 in cleaning and comfort
Meets TSA requirements *
#1 in cleaning and comfort
http://www.drugstore.com/clear-care-...4?catid=328028
#29
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 33
I just wanted to let some of those asking the questions know that the items in question (nitro pills) are allowed based on the prohibited/allowed items list officially. Anything else will have to come from further up the food chain.
#30
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 662
I understand that you do not make the rules and are only stating them, but if you really want to clarify the rules you would say the following:
"TSA screeners can ban anything they want to and there's not a thing you can do about it."
Last edited by T-the-B; Jun 11, 2014 at 10:59 am Reason: correct typo