'Dear America, I Saw You Naked'
#46
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
And LuAnn Canipe didn't have the courage to reference the article that precipitated the TSA's defensive posture.
~~
Note that no comments have been posted yet. I would imagine the "blog team" is being overwhelmed with negativity and doesn't know where to begin in putting comments up.
~~
Note that no comments have been posted yet. I would imagine the "blog team" is being overwhelmed with negativity and doesn't know where to begin in putting comments up.
Last edited by petaluma1; Feb 1, 2014 at 9:33 am
#47
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SAN
Programs: AS MVPG, UA Silver, Marriott + SPG Gold, Global Entry
Posts: 302
Unfortunately, none of this stuff is really news to those of us who have been on FT for a while.
But I look forward to his book. I'll probably buy it and try to loan it to my friends who are not interested in aviation security because they don't fly.
But I'd really love to see a copy of this book given gratis to every senator and representative in the US Congress.
But I look forward to his book. I'll probably buy it and try to loan it to my friends who are not interested in aviation security because they don't fly.
But I'd really love to see a copy of this book given gratis to every senator and representative in the US Congress.
#50
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
I don't think so. It's quite common for the blog staff to not approve any comments over the weekend --- as has been commented on many times here.
#51
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
And LuAnn Canipe didn't have the courage to reference the article that precipitated the TSA's defensive posture.
~~
Note that no comments have been posted yet. I would imagine the "blog team" is being overwhelmed with negativity and doesn't know where to begin in putting comments up.
~~
Note that no comments have been posted yet. I would imagine the "blog team" is being overwhelmed with negativity and doesn't know where to begin in putting comments up.
#52
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX (elite) and a few others (non-elite)
Posts: 687
im not worried about body scanner as it keeps people not from america to blow them self up.....its ok too see all one body at a time like this...as its needed...feel save when going on plane.....vary happy to be an american that not put up with people that want to do harm.....smile)
I love your country, but I haven't forgotten the huge amount of funding the IRA received from the US to sustain one of the most protracted and bloody terrorist campaigns in the Western world. And the list of American citizens who are terrorists isn't short either.
The reality is that nationality is NOT a determinant of who is, or supports, a terrorist
Just saying...
#53
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
One of the reports covering Mr. Harrington's article includes a video that contains, IMO, an interesting shot. At 1:09 in this video, you can see this:
I think it is interesting because it confirms that TSA employees have to click on a blue or pink button (= male or female NOS victim) to enable the ATR. That is ridiculous! Why the hell should gender matter if TSA is supposed to be screening for WEI? Why the hell is TSA using a technology that needs to be TOLD to ignore* the bulge that is a penis or a breast? How in the world does such a technology account for wide-ranging diversity in human shapes, sizes, and postures? IMO, the blue and pink buttons serve only to demonstrate that TSA's visual approach to screening pax is completely wrong.
*Unless it is an unusually shaped or sized penis or breast, of course
I think it is interesting because it confirms that TSA employees have to click on a blue or pink button (= male or female NOS victim) to enable the ATR. That is ridiculous! Why the hell should gender matter if TSA is supposed to be screening for WEI? Why the hell is TSA using a technology that needs to be TOLD to ignore* the bulge that is a penis or a breast? How in the world does such a technology account for wide-ranging diversity in human shapes, sizes, and postures? IMO, the blue and pink buttons serve only to demonstrate that TSA's visual approach to screening pax is completely wrong.
*Unless it is an unusually shaped or sized penis or breast, of course
#54
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
im not worried about body scanner as it keeps people not from america to blow them self up.....its ok too see all one body at a time like this...as its needed...feel save when going on plane.....vary happy to be an american that not put up with people that want to do harm.....smile)
#55
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
I think it is interesting because it confirms that TSA employees have to click on a blue or pink button (= male or female NOS victim) to enable the ATR. That is ridiculous! Why the hell should gender matter if TSA is supposed to be screening for WEI? Why the hell is TSA using a technology that needs to be TOLD to ignore* the bulge that is a penis or a breast?
#58
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Even with different male/female standards, the AIT false alarms nearly every time it's used. Having a single standard would make this much worse.
1) To build an empire, spend money, enrich cronies, and
2) To add further the depth of script to their Kabuki Theatre.
Notice the absence of "improved security" from the list.
* - for no other reason than the TSA's CHOICE to used flawed technology.
#59
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 390
I like arguments like this.
What everyone seems to ignore is WHY a 'terrorist' wants to attack the USA or the UK or any other empire.
Federal policy of being racist arse0's for decades is the real reason. Your country isn't as great as you may believe. And you certainly are not free. There are many better countries, with healthier, more wealthy and more happy citizens. These countries are often ignored by terrorists, odd? The reality of America or the UK, does not match up to the media controlled image of two insolvent governments with oppressed and controlled people.
But that's not the point is it.
What everyone seems to ignore is WHY a 'terrorist' wants to attack the USA or the UK or any other empire.
Federal policy of being racist arse0's for decades is the real reason. Your country isn't as great as you may believe. And you certainly are not free. There are many better countries, with healthier, more wealthy and more happy citizens. These countries are often ignored by terrorists, odd? The reality of America or the UK, does not match up to the media controlled image of two insolvent governments with oppressed and controlled people.
But that's not the point is it.
#60
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
I'm well aware that the U.S. has serious flaws, one of which is the willingness of so many to tolerate (and even excuse) evaporating freedoms.